Medical Management Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics (LIME), 27106Karolinska Institute, Sweden.
Health Serv Manage Res. 2023 May;36(2):109-118. doi: 10.1177/09514848221100751. Epub 2022 May 16.
A European initiative to design a "medical information framework" conceptualised how multiple stakeholders join in collaborative networks to create innovations. It conveyed the ways in which value is created and captured by stakeholders. We applied those insights to analyse a multi-stakeholder initiative to promote improvement of Swedish healthcare. Our longitudinal case study covered totally fifty stakeholders involved in a national project, aiming at designing a system to support value-based evaluation and reimbursement. During the project the focus changed from reimbursement to benchmarking. Sophisticated case-mix adjusting algorithms were designed to make outcome comparisons valid and incorporated in a software platform enabling detailed analysis of eight patient groups across seven regional health authorities. Those were deliverables demonstrating value created. However, the project was unable to transfer the system into routine use in the regions, a failed value-capture. The initial success was promoted by collaborative processes in diagnosis-specific working groups of well-informed and engaged professionals. The change of focus away from reimbursement decreased the involvement among health authorities, leaving no centrally placed persons to push for implementation. It highlights the importance of health professionals as the key stakeholder, who has both the know-how instrumental to creating an innovation, and the local involvement guaranteeing its implementation.
一个欧洲倡议旨在设计一个“医疗信息框架”,构想了多个利益相关者如何加入合作网络以创造创新。它传达了利益相关者创造和获取价值的方式。我们应用这些见解来分析一项促进瑞典医疗保健改善的多利益相关者倡议。我们的纵向案例研究涵盖了总共五十个参与国家项目的利益相关者,该项目旨在设计一个支持基于价值的评估和报销的系统。在项目过程中,重点从报销转向基准测试。设计了复杂的病例组合调整算法,以使结果比较有效,并纳入一个软件平台,使七个地区卫生当局的八个患者群体能够进行详细分析。这些是展示创造价值的可交付成果。然而,该项目未能将该系统转移到地区的常规使用中,这是一次失败的价值捕获。最初的成功是由具有丰富知识和参与意识的专业人员的特定诊断工作组的协作过程推动的。关注重点从报销转向基准测试,减少了卫生当局的参与度,导致没有居中的人员来推动实施。这凸显了卫生专业人员作为关键利益相关者的重要性,他们既拥有创造创新所需的专业知识,又能确保在当地的参与度以保证其实施。