Suppr超能文献

肺癌特异性死亡率与公共健康保险:中国西南重庆的一项前瞻性队列研究。

Lung Cancer-Specific Mortality Risk and Public Health Insurance: A Prospective Cohort Study in Chongqing, Southwest China.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Chongqing Key Laboratory of Translational Research for Cancer Metastasis and Individualized Treatment, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 29;10:842844. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.842844. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The incidence and mortality of lung cancer rank first among malignant tumors, and its long treatment cycle will bring serious economic burdens to lung cancer patients and their families. There are few studies on the prognosis of lung cancer and insurance policies. This article explores the relationship between the lung cancer-specific death and public health insurance, self-paying rate, and the joint effect of public health insurance and self-paying rate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective longitudinal cohort study was conducted in Chongqing, China from 2013 to 2019. The selected subjects were patients with C33-C34 coded according to the tenth edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10), aged 20 years or older. We conduct a subgroup analysis based on public health insurance types and self-paying rates. After following the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the test was used to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with different insurance types and different self-paying rates. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between patients with different insurance types, self-paying rates, and lung cancer treatment methods. Finally, the Cox proportional hazard model and the competitive risk model are used to calculate the cumulative hazard ratio of all-cause death and lung cancer-specific death for different insurance types and different self-paying rate groups.

RESULTS

A total of 12,464 patients with lung cancer were included in this study. During the follow-up period (median 13 months, interquartile range 5.6-25.2 months), 5,803 deaths were observed, of which 3,781 died of lung cancer. Compared with patients who received urban resident-based basic medical insurance (URBMI), patients who received urban employee-based basic medical insurance (UEBMI) had a 38.1% higher risk of lung cancer-specific death (Hazard Ratios (HRs) = 1.381, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.293-1.476, < 0.005), Compared with patients with insufficient self-paying rate, patients with a higher self-paying rate had a 40.2% lower risk of lung cancer-specific death (HRs = 0.598, 95% CI: 0.557-0.643, < 0.005). Every 10% increase in self-paying rate of URBMI reduces the risk of lung cancer-specific death by 17.6%, while every 10% increase in self-paying rate of UEBMI reduces the risk of lung cancer-specific death by 18.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

The National Medical Security Administration should, under the condition of limited medical insurance funds, try to include the original self-paid anti-tumor drugs into the national medical insurance coverage. This can not only reduce the mortality rate of lung cancer patients, but also reduce the family burden of lung cancer patients. On the other hand, high-risk groups should increase their awareness of lung cancer screening and actively participate in the national cancer screening project led by the state.

摘要

目的

肺癌的发病率和死亡率在恶性肿瘤中排名第一,其漫长的治疗周期将给肺癌患者及其家庭带来严重的经济负担。关于肺癌的预后和保险政策的研究较少。本文探讨了肺癌特异性死亡与公共健康保险、自付费率以及公共健康保险和自付费率联合作用之间的关系。

材料和方法

本研究是一项在中国重庆进行的前瞻性纵向队列研究,纳入了 2013 年至 2019 年间年龄在 20 岁及以上、按照第十版国际疾病分类(ICD-10)编码为 C33-C34 的患者。我们根据公共健康保险类型和自付费率进行了亚组分析。在进行纳入和排除标准后,采用检验描述不同保险类型和自付费率患者的人口统计学和临床特征。采用多变量逻辑回归分析不同保险类型、自付费率与肺癌治疗方式的关系。最后,采用 Cox 比例风险模型和竞争风险模型计算不同保险类型和不同自付费率组别的全因死亡和肺癌特异性死亡的累积风险比。

结果

本研究共纳入了 12464 例肺癌患者。在随访期间(中位随访时间为 13 个月,四分位间距为 5.6-25.2 个月),共观察到 5803 例死亡,其中 3781 例死于肺癌。与接受城镇居民基本医疗保险(URBMI)的患者相比,接受城镇职工基本医疗保险(UEBMI)的患者肺癌特异性死亡风险增加 38.1%(风险比[HRs] = 1.381,95%置信区间[CI]:1.293-1.476,<0.005)。与自付费率不足的患者相比,自付费率较高的患者肺癌特异性死亡风险降低 40.2%(HRs = 0.598,95%CI:0.557-0.643,<0.005)。URBMI 自付费率每增加 10%,肺癌特异性死亡风险降低 17.6%,而 UEBMI 自付费率每增加 10%,肺癌特异性死亡风险降低 18.0%。

结论

国家医疗保障局应在医疗保险资金有限的情况下,尝试将原有的自费抗肿瘤药物纳入国家医疗保险覆盖范围。这不仅可以降低肺癌患者的死亡率,还可以减轻肺癌患者的家庭负担。另一方面,高危人群应提高对肺癌筛查的认识,积极参与国家主导的国家癌症筛查项目。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c93/9099244/208525487363/fpubh-10-842844-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验