根管封闭剂对……的抗菌效果
Antimicrobial effectiveness of root canal sealers against .
作者信息
Castillo-Villagomez Paola, Madla-Cruz Elizabeth, Lopez-Martinez Fanny, Rodriguez-Delgado Idalia, Flores-Treviño Jorge Jaime, Malagon-Santiago Guadalupe Ismael, de La Garza-Ramos Myriam Angelica
机构信息
Facultad de Odontología, Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Ciencias de la Salud (CIDICS), Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Colonia Mitras Centro, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico, CP, USA.
出版信息
Biomater Investig Dent. 2022 May 10;9(1):47-51. doi: 10.1080/26415275.2022.2071719. eCollection 2022.
We evaluated four root canal sealers to determine their antimicrobial effectiveness against . The direct contact test was used to measure the effectiveness of the study materials and close contact between bacteria on the kinetics of bacterial growth. The agar diffusion test (ADT) was also performed for comparison. Using one-way ANOVA and the F-test, significant differences between the sealers were confirmed. Whereas BioRoot endodontic sealer had an antimicrobial effect statistically similar to the zinc oxide-eugenol control (=.99), EndoSequence sealer and AH Plus sealer both had a significantly lower antimicrobial effect than the control (=.0000266 and =.0000068, respectively).
我们评估了四种根管封闭剂，以确定它们对……的抗菌效果。采用直接接触试验来测量研究材料的有效性以及细菌之间的紧密接触对细菌生长动力学的影响。还进行了琼脂扩散试验（ADT）以作比较。使用单因素方差分析和F检验，证实了封闭剂之间存在显著差异。BioRoot牙髓封闭剂的抗菌效果在统计学上与氧化锌丁香酚对照剂相似（=0.99），而EndoSequence封闭剂和AH Plus封闭剂的抗菌效果均显著低于对照剂（分别为=0.0000266和=0.0000068）。
Zotero 插件