Arora Suraj, Mir Shugufta, Gautam Ashesh, Batra Renu, Soni Sarmeshta, Lata Kamini
Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry King Khalid University, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, e-mail:
Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry King Khalid University, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Jun 1;19(6):680-683.
The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of root canal sealer's antimicrobial activity against Enterococcus faecalis.
Root canal sealers with the brands Endoflas FS, AH Plus, and Tubli-Seal EWT were selected. Enterococcus faecalis organisms' zone of inhibition was measured. Tukey post hoc tests and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to compare the data among study groups and within its group. The data were said to be statistically significant with an established p-value less than 0.05.
The maximum zone of inhibition (23.20 ± 1.202 mm) was shown by Endoflas FS sealer; AH Plus and Tubli-Seal showed the inhibition zone of (18.42 ± 1.023) and (16.88 ± 0.962) respectively, following Endoflas FS. The ANOVA test showed p < 0.0001, which is highly statistically significant. AH Plus and Endoflas FS showed a statistically significant difference of 0.04 and 0.001 in between groups, and there was no statistically significant difference in the Tubli-Seal group from Tukey post hoc test.
The study showed that Endoflas FS sealer has a significant antimicrobial effect against E. faecalis.
In clinical situation, despite perfect che-momechanical root canal preparation, persistence of microorganisms may reinfect the root canal. Therefore, endodontic root canal sealers play a major role in the eradication of bacteria. The polymicrobial nature of endodontic infection plays a main role during the usage of endodontic sealer with antimicrobial agents, which in turn reduces the failure of endodontic treatment.
本研究旨在评估根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌的抗菌活性。
选用Endoflas FS、AH Plus和Tubli - Seal EWT品牌的根管封闭剂。测量粪肠球菌的抑菌圈。采用Tukey事后检验和单因素方差分析(ANOVA)对研究组间及组内数据进行比较。当既定的p值小于0.05时,数据被认为具有统计学意义。
Endoflas FS封闭剂显示出最大抑菌圈(23.20±1.202毫米);AH Plus和Tubli - Seal的抑菌圈分别为(18.42±1.023)和(16.88±0.962),仅次于Endoflas FS。方差分析显示p < 0.0001,具有高度统计学意义。AH Plus和Endoflas FS组间差异在统计学上分别为0.04和0.001,Tukey事后检验显示Tubli - Seal组无统计学差异。
本研究表明Endoflas FS封闭剂对粪肠球菌具有显著的抗菌作用。
在临床情况下,尽管进行了完美的化学机械根管预备,但微生物的持续存在可能会使根管再次感染。因此,牙髓根管封闭剂在根除细菌方面起着主要作用。牙髓感染的多微生物性质在使用含抗菌剂的牙髓封闭剂过程中起主要作用,这反过来又降低了牙髓治疗的失败率。