Dalmia Swati, Gaikwad Abhidnya, Samuel Roshan, Aher Gayatri, Gulve Meenal, Kolhe Swapnil
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, MGV's K.B.H. Dental College and Hospital, Nashik, Maharashtra, India.
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2018 Mar-Apr;8(2):104-109. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_29_18. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
The aim of this study is to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of four different endodontic sealers against .
Four different endodontic sealers, namely, resin based (AH Plus), zinc oxide-eugenol based (Tubliseal), calcium hydroxide based (Sealapex), and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA Fillapex) based were tested for their antimicrobial efficacy against using agar diffusion method. Four wells were made by the removal of agar at equidistant points and filled with freshly mixed respective root canal sealers and were inoculated with . All the three plates were incubated for a period of 72 h at 37°C under aerobic conditions. The diameter of inhibition zones was measured at 24, 48, and 72 h time intervals. Data obtained were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and unpaired -test.
All the tested sealers showed some bacterial growth inhibition of . Their efficacy in descending order of antibacterial activity was as follows: Sealapex > AH Plus > Tubliseal > MTA Fillapex. The efficacy of the root canal sealers decreased marginally with increase in their duration of action.
Antimicrobial efficacy of calcium hydroxide-based sealer was highest followed by resin-based sealer and was the least with MTA based sealer.
本研究旨在比较四种不同根管封闭剂的抗菌效果。
采用琼脂扩散法测试四种不同的根管封闭剂,即树脂基(AH Plus)、氧化锌丁香酚基(Tubliseal)、氢氧化钙基(Sealapex)和矿物三氧化物凝聚体(MTA Fillapex)对[具体细菌名称未给出]的抗菌效果。通过在等距点去除琼脂制作四个孔,填充新鲜混合的相应根管封闭剂,并接种[具体细菌名称未给出]。所有三个平板在37°C有氧条件下孵育72小时。在24、48和72小时间隔测量抑菌圈直径。使用单因素方差分析和非配对t检验对获得的数据进行统计分析。
所有测试的封闭剂均显示出对[具体细菌名称未给出]的一定细菌生长抑制作用。它们的抗菌活性从高到低的顺序如下:Sealapex > AH Plus > Tubliseal > MTA Fillapex。根管封闭剂的效果随着作用时间的增加略有下降。
氢氧化钙基封闭剂的抗菌效果最高,其次是树脂基封闭剂,而MTA基封闭剂的抗菌效果最低。