Perin N, Casara D, Bertoli M, Di Landro D, Naso A, Gasparotto M L, Ruffatti A, Vertolli U, Urso M, Romagnoli G F
Int J Artif Organs. 1986 Dec;9 Suppl 3:143-6.
The present study compares the effects of bicarbonate hemodialysis (Bic. HD) and biofiltration (BF), a new hemodiafiltration technique, on plasma volume (PV) changes and extravascular fluid mobilization (Vfm). Ten uremic patients underwent one experimental session of Bic. HD and, one week later, one of BF, both on the second dialysis of the week. Net ultrafiltration rate was limited to 700 ml/min. At the start of each session, whole blood volume (WBV), PV and red cell volume (RCV) were determined using 5 mu Ci of radioiodinated serum albumin (RISA). PV and Vfm were calculated at hourly intervals using a serial hematocrit method. On Bic. HD, PV increased at 60 min. then decreased at 120 and 180 min., with efficient Vfm only during the first hour. On BF, PV increased throughout treatment, with greater Vfm. It would appear that PV is better preserved in BF, on account of more efficient Vfm.
本研究比较了碳酸氢盐血液透析(Bic.HD)和一种新的血液透析滤过技术——生物滤过(BF)对血浆容量(PV)变化和血管外液体动员(Vfm)的影响。10名尿毒症患者在一周中的第二次透析时接受了一次Bic.HD实验,一周后又接受了一次BF实验。净超滤率限制在700毫升/分钟。在每次实验开始时,使用5微居里放射性碘标记血清白蛋白(RISA)测定全血容量(WBV)、PV和红细胞容量(RCV)。使用连续血细胞比容法每隔一小时计算一次PV和Vfm。在Bic.HD时,PV在60分钟时增加,然后在120分钟和180分钟时下降,仅在第一个小时内有有效的Vfm。在BF时,PV在整个治疗过程中增加,Vfm更大。由于Vfm更有效,似乎BF能更好地保存PV。