Suppr超能文献

应用含氟封闭剂和氟漆治疗恒牙近中釉质龋对龋病进展的疗效:一项为期12个月的半口随机临床试验。

Effectiveness of applying proximal enamel caries with fluoride-releasing sealant and fluoride varnish on caries progression in permanent teeth: A 12-month split-mouth randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Treeratweerapong Yodkwan, Nakornchai Siriruk, Jirarattanasopha Varangkanar

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Int J Paediatr Dent. 2023 Jan;33(1):30-39. doi: 10.1111/ipd.13011. Epub 2022 Jun 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few studies report on managing initial proximal caries with sealants, and no reports focus on fluoride-releasing sealants.

AIM

To compare the effectiveness between applications of a fluoride-releasing sealant and fluoride varnish on proximal enamel caries to control caries progression in permanent teeth.

DESIGN

This was a split-mouth randomized controlled trial in forty-four 11- to 16-year-old children with radiographic caries in at least one contralateral pair of teeth with proximal enamel caries. The lesions were evaluated using DIAGNOdent and were also assessed visually after tooth separation. The lesions in each subject were randomly sealed with a fluoride-releasing sealant (Helioseal® F) or applied with fluoride varnish (Duraphat®). The fluoride varnish-treated lesion was reapplied at 3 and 6 months. Clinical examination, bitewing radiograph evaluation, and DIAGNOdent assessment were performed at 6 and 12 months. The caries progression outcome variables were regression, no change, and progression. The data were analyzed with the McNemar-Bowker test.

RESULTS

Radiographic examination and DIAGNOdent assessment demonstrated no significant differences in the percentages of regression, no change, or progression at the 12-month follow-up (p > .05).

CONCLUSION

Applications of a fluoride-releasing sealant and of fluoride varnish three times resulted in a nonsignificant difference in caries progression of initial proximal caries at the 12-month follow-up.

摘要

背景

很少有研究报告用窝沟封闭剂处理早期邻面龋,且没有报告聚焦于含氟窝沟封闭剂。

目的

比较含氟窝沟封闭剂与氟漆应用于恒牙邻面釉质龋以控制龋病进展的效果。

设计

这是一项针对44名11至16岁儿童的半口随机对照试验,这些儿童至少有一对对侧牙存在邻面釉质龋的影像学龋损。使用DIAGNOdent评估龋损,并在牙齿分离后进行视觉评估。每个受试者的龋损随机用含氟窝沟封闭剂(Helioseal® F)封闭或涂抹氟漆(Duraphat®)。氟漆处理的龋损在3个月和6个月时再次涂抹。在6个月和12个月时进行临床检查、咬合翼片X线片评估和DIAGNOdent评估。龋病进展的结果变量为退缩、无变化和进展。数据采用McNemar-Bowker检验进行分析。

结果

影像学检查和DIAGNOdent评估显示,在12个月随访时,退缩、无变化或进展的百分比无显著差异(p>0.05)。

结论

在12个月随访时,应用含氟窝沟封闭剂和三次氟漆在早期邻面龋的龋病进展方面无显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验