• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Visual Distraction Disrupts Category-tuned Attentional Filters in Ventral Visual Cortex.视觉分心会扰乱腹侧视觉皮层中调谐注意力过滤器的功能。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2022 Jul 1;34(8):1521-1533. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01870.
2
History Modulates Early Sensory Processing of Salient Distractors.历史调节显著干扰物的早期感觉处理。
J Neurosci. 2021 Sep 22;41(38):8007-8022. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3099-20.2021. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
3
Neural mechanisms of object-based attention.基于客体的注意的神经机制。
Cereb Cortex. 2015 Apr;25(4):1080-92. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht303. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
4
Perceptual distraction causes visual memory encoding intrusions.感知分心导致视觉记忆编码干扰。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Oct;28(5):1592-1600. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01937-6. Epub 2021 May 23.
5
fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection.功能性磁共振成像证据表明物体是注意力选择的单位。
Nature. 1999 Oct 7;401(6753):584-7. doi: 10.1038/44134.
6
Changes in visual cortical processing attenuate singleton distraction during visual search.视觉皮层处理的变化会减弱视觉搜索中单点分心。
Cortex. 2020 Nov;132:309-321. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.08.025. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Top-down biases win against focal attention in the fusiform face area.自上而下的偏差在梭状回面孔区战胜了焦点注意力。
Neuroimage. 2007 Dec;38(4):730-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.006. Epub 2007 Aug 19.
8
The Role of Top-Down Focused Spatial Attention in Preattentive Salience Coding and Salience-based Attentional Capture.自上而下的聚焦空间注意在预注意显著性编码和基于显著性的注意捕获中的作用。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Aug;28(8):1152-65. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00964. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
9
Orchestrating Proactive and Reactive Mechanisms for Filtering Distracting Information: Brain-Behavior Relationships Revealed by a Mixed-Design fMRI Study.协调用于过滤干扰信息的主动和反应机制:一项混合设计功能磁共振成像研究揭示的脑-行为关系
J Neurosci. 2016 Jan 20;36(3):988-1000. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2966-15.2016.
10
Predicting N2pc from anticipatory HbO activity during sustained visuospatial attention: a concurrent fNIRS-ERP study.在持续视觉空间注意期间,根据预期的血红蛋白氧合活性预测N2pc:一项同步功能近红外光谱-事件相关电位研究。
Neuroimage. 2015 Jun;113:225-34. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.044. Epub 2015 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Trichotomy revisited: A monolithic theory of attentional control.重新审视三分法:注意控制的整体理论。
Vision Res. 2024 Apr;217:108366. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2024.108366. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
2
Attention as a multi-level system of weights and balances.注意作为一个多层次的权重和平衡系统。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2023 Jan;14(1):e1633. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1633. Epub 2022 Oct 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Perceptual distraction causes visual memory encoding intrusions.感知分心导致视觉记忆编码干扰。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Oct;28(5):1592-1600. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01937-6. Epub 2021 May 23.
2
Passive exposure attenuates distraction during visual search.被动暴露会削弱视觉搜索过程中的分心。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Oct;149(10):1987-1995. doi: 10.1037/xge0000760. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
3
Attentional capture alters feature perception.注意捕获改变了特征感知。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Nov;45(11):1443-1454. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000681. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
4
Anticipatory Distractor Suppression Elicited by Statistical Regularities in Visual Search.视觉搜索中统计规律诱发的预期分心物抑制。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Oct;31(10):1535-1548. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01433. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
5
Getting rid of visual distractors: the why, when, how, and where.去除视觉干扰物:原因、时机、方法和地点。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Oct;29:135-147. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
6
Habituation of oculomotor capture by sudden onsets: Stimulus specificity, spontaneous recovery and dishabituation.突发刺激引起的动眼捕捉习惯化:刺激特异性、自发恢复和去习惯化。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Feb;45(2):264-284. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000605. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
7
Lateralized Suppression of Alpha-Band EEG Activity As a Mechanism of Target Processing.偏侧化的α 波段脑电活动抑制作为目标处理的机制。
J Neurosci. 2019 Jan 30;39(5):900-917. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0183-18.2018. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
8
Filtering visual onsets via habituation: A context-specific long-term memory of irrelevant stimuli.通过习惯化过滤视觉起始:无关刺激的特定于上下文的长期记忆。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Jun;25(3):1028-1034. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1320-x.
9
Attentional capture in visual search: Capture and post-capture dynamics revealed by EEG.视觉搜索中的注意捕获:EEG 揭示的捕获和捕获后动力学。
Neuroimage. 2017 Aug 1;156:166-173. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.016. Epub 2017 May 11.
10
Object detection in natural scenes: Independent effects of spatial and category-based attention.自然场景中的目标检测:基于空间和类别的注意力的独立作用。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Apr;79(3):738-752. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1279-8.

视觉分心会扰乱腹侧视觉皮层中调谐注意力过滤器的功能。

Visual Distraction Disrupts Category-tuned Attentional Filters in Ventral Visual Cortex.

机构信息

The Ohio State University.

出版信息

J Cogn Neurosci. 2022 Jul 1;34(8):1521-1533. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01870.

DOI:10.1162/jocn_a_01870
PMID:35579979
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9665840/
Abstract

Our behavioral goals shape how we process information via attentional filters that prioritize goal-relevant information, dictating both where we attend and what we attend to. When something unexpected or salient appears in the environment, it captures our spatial attention. Extensive research has focused on the spatiotemporal aspects of attentional capture, but what happens to concurrent nonspatial filters during visual distraction? Here, we demonstrate a novel, broader consequence of distraction: widespread disruption to filters that regulate category-specific object processing. We recorded fMRI while participants viewed arrays of face/house hybrid images. On distractor-absent trials, we found robust evidence for the standard signature of category-tuned attentional filtering: greater BOLD activation in fusiform face area during attend-faces blocks and in parahippocampal place area during attend-houses blocks. However, on trials where a salient distractor (white rectangle) flashed abruptly around a nontarget location, not only was spatial attention captured, but the concurrent category-tuned attentional filter was disrupted, revealing a boost in activation for the to-be-ignored category. This disruption was robust, resulting in errant processing-and early on, prioritization-of goal-inconsistent information. These findings provide a direct test of the filter disruption theory: that in addition to disrupting spatial attention, distraction also disrupts nonspatial attentional filters tuned to goal-relevant information. Moreover, these results reveal that, under certain circumstances, the filter disruption may be so profound as to induce a full reversal of the attentional control settings, which carries novel implications for both theory and real-world perception.

摘要

我们的行为目标通过注意力过滤器来塑造我们处理信息的方式,这些过滤器优先考虑与目标相关的信息,决定了我们关注的位置和关注的内容。当环境中出现意外或突出的事物时,它会吸引我们的空间注意力。大量研究集中在注意力捕获的时空方面,但在视觉干扰期间,同时存在的非空间过滤器会发生什么?在这里,我们展示了分心的一个新的、更广泛的后果:广泛破坏调节特定类别物体处理的过滤器。我们在参与者观看面孔/房屋混合图像的数组时记录了 fMRI。在没有分心物的试验中,我们发现了有力的证据表明,类别调谐注意力过滤的标准特征:在注意面孔的块中,梭状回面孔区的 BOLD 激活更强,而在注意房屋的块中,旁海马区的位置区更强。然而,在一个突出的分心物(白色矩形)突然出现在非目标位置的试验中,不仅空间注意力被捕获,而且同时的类别调谐注意力过滤器被破坏,导致被忽略的类别的激活增加。这种干扰是强大的,导致目标不一致的信息错误处理和优先处理。这些发现直接检验了过滤器干扰理论:除了干扰空间注意力外,分心还会干扰与目标相关信息调谐的非空间注意力过滤器。此外,这些结果表明,在某些情况下,过滤器的干扰可能会如此深刻,以至于完全逆转注意力控制设置,这对理论和现实世界的感知都有新的意义。