Suppr超能文献

人类种系基因组编辑的脆弱性与伦理问题。

Vulnerability and the Ethics of Human Germline Genome Editing.

机构信息

SHAPES Initiative, Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Department of Paediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

CRISPR J. 2022 Jun;5(3):358-363. doi: 10.1089/crispr.2021.0053. Epub 2022 May 17.

Abstract

The concept of vulnerability has played an important role in theoretical bioethics as well as in numerous authoritative guidelines on research ethics. The concept helps to identify situations in which research participants and other individuals may be at a heightened risk of experiencing harm. However, existing guidance documents on the ethics of human germline gene editing largely fail to make any reference to considerations of vulnerability. In this article, we discuss this oversight and we highlight the role that vulnerability can play in ethical debates about human heritable genome editing. Future guidance documents on germline gene editing should pay attention to considerations of vulnerability and reference these appropriately.

摘要

脆弱性概念在理论生命伦理学以及众多权威的研究伦理准则中都发挥了重要作用。该概念有助于识别研究参与者和其他个人可能面临更高风险的情况,从而受到伤害。然而,现有的人类种系基因编辑伦理准则文件在很大程度上没有提到对脆弱性的考虑。在本文中,我们讨论了这一疏忽,并强调了脆弱性在人类可遗传基因组编辑的伦理辩论中可以发挥的作用。未来关于种系基因编辑的指导文件应注意脆弱性的考虑,并适当地提及这些考虑。

相似文献

1
Vulnerability and the Ethics of Human Germline Genome Editing.人类种系基因组编辑的脆弱性与伦理问题。
CRISPR J. 2022 Jun;5(3):358-363. doi: 10.1089/crispr.2021.0053. Epub 2022 May 17.
3
Ethics of Human Genome Editing.人类基因组编辑的伦理问题。
Annu Rev Med. 2019 Jan 27;70:289-305. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-112717-094629.
5
Therapeutic Germline Editing: Sense and Sensibility.治疗性种系编辑:有识之士的观点。
Trends Genet. 2020 May;36(5):315-317. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2019.12.011. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
6
CRISPR Ethics: Moral Considerations for Applications of a Powerful Tool.CRISPR 伦理:对强大工具应用的道德考量。
J Mol Biol. 2019 Jan 4;431(1):88-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.05.044. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
8
The New RNA-Editing Era - Ethical Considerations.新 RNA 编辑时代——伦理考量。
Trends Genet. 2021 Aug;37(8):685-687. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2021.04.013. Epub 2021 May 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimation of the number of people with Down syndrome in Europe.估算欧洲唐氏综合征患者人数。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2021 Mar;29(3):402-410. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-00748-y. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
4
Do CRISPR Germline Ethics Statements Cut It?CRISPR生殖系伦理声明可行吗?
CRISPR J. 2018 Apr;1(2):115-125. doi: 10.1089/crispr.2017.0024.
8
Identifying and evaluating layers of vulnerability - a way forward.识别和评估脆弱性层次——前进的道路。
Dev World Bioeth. 2019 Jun;19(2):86-95. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12206. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
9
The Ethics of Germline Gene Editing.生殖系基因编辑的伦理问题。
J Appl Philos. 2017 Aug;34(4):498-513. doi: 10.1111/japp.12249. Epub 2016 Nov 9.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验