Walker Alexis K, Fox Elizabeth L
A Hecht-Levi Postdoctoral Fellow in the Berman Institute of Bioethics at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.
AMA J Ethics. 2018 Oct 1;20(10):E941-947. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2018.941.
In a 2015 paper published in the , bioethicist Henk ten Have identifies vulnerability as a "controversial topic in bioethics" and argues that bioethical attention to vulnerability comes at the expense of sufficient attention to the social structures that shape human life. In this paper, we situate ten Have's argument within the broader bioethical literature, emphasizing how critiques of vulnerability can enrich approaches in clinical settings, including in nutrition, where the concept of vulnerability is not foreign (eg, children are often labeled members of a vulnerable group). We use an example of food (in)security to show how reframing vulnerability to capture "layers of marginalization" can help clinicians and organizations more clearly identify who is most in need, develop solutions for what should be done, and determine how and by whom those solutions should be implemented.
在2015年发表于《》的一篇论文中,生物伦理学家亨克·滕·哈夫将脆弱性认定为“生物伦理学中的一个有争议的话题”,并认为生物伦理学对脆弱性的关注是以牺牲对塑造人类生活的社会结构的充分关注为代价的。在本文中,我们将滕·哈夫的论点置于更广泛的生物伦理文献中,强调对脆弱性的批判如何能够丰富临床环境中的方法,包括在营养领域,在那里脆弱性的概念并不陌生(例如,儿童常常被标记为弱势群体的成员)。我们以粮食(无)安全为例,展示重新构建脆弱性以捕捉“边缘化层次”如何能够帮助临床医生和组织更清楚地确定谁最需要帮助,制定应对措施,以及确定这些措施应如何实施以及由谁来实施。