Suppr超能文献

电子血糖监测对医护人员和患者行为的影响。

Electronic blood glucose monitoring impacts on provider and patient behavior.

机构信息

Amazon, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Inova Health System, Falls Church, Virginia, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Jul 12;29(8):1381-1390. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac069.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Recent technological development along with the constraints imposed by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have led to increased availability of patient-generated health data. However, it is not well understood how to effectively integrate this new technology into large health systems. This article seeks to identify interventions to increase utilization of electronic blood glucose monitoring for patients with diabetes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A large randomized controlled trial tested the impact of multiple interventions to promote use of electronic blood glucose tracking. The total study sample consisted of 7052 patients with diabetes across 68 providers at 20 selected primary care offices. The design included 2 stages: First, primary care practices were randomly assigned to have their providers receive education regarding blood glucose flowsheet orders. Then, patients in the treated practices were assigned to 1 of 4 reminder interventions.

RESULTS

Provider education successfully increased provider take-up of an online blood glucose monitoring tool by 64 percentage points, while a comparison of reminder interventions revealed that emphasizing accountability to the provider encouraged patients to track their blood glucose online. An assessment of downstream outcomes revealed impacts of the interventions on prescribing behavior and A1c testing frequency.

DISCUSSION

It is important to understand how health systems can practically promote take-up and awareness of emerging digital health alternatives or those with persistently low utilization in clinical settings.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that provider training and support are critical first steps to promote utilization of patient-generated health data, and that patient communications can provide further motivation.

摘要

目的

最近的技术发展以及 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行带来的限制,使得患者生成的健康数据越来越容易获得。然而,如何有效地将这项新技术融入大型卫生系统,人们对此还不甚了解。本文旨在确定可提高糖尿病患者电子血糖监测利用率的干预措施。

材料与方法

一项大型随机对照试验测试了多种干预措施对促进电子血糖跟踪使用的影响。总研究样本包括 68 家参与机构的 7052 名糖尿病患者。设计包括 2 个阶段:首先,将初级保健机构随机分配,让其提供者接受有关血糖记录单医嘱的教育。然后,将接受治疗的实践中的患者分配到 4 种提醒干预措施中的 1 种。

结果

提供者教育成功地将提供者对在线血糖监测工具的采用率提高了 64 个百分点,而对提醒干预措施的比较表明,强调对提供者的责任可以鼓励患者在线跟踪他们的血糖。对下游结果的评估显示,干预措施对处方行为和 A1c 检测频率产生了影响。

讨论

了解卫生系统如何在实践中促进新兴数字健康替代方案或在临床环境中利用率持续较低的方案的采用和意识非常重要。

结论

这些结果表明,提供者培训和支持是促进患者生成的健康数据利用的关键第一步,而患者沟通可以提供进一步的动力。

相似文献

3
4
Adult patient access to electronic health records.成年患者获取电子健康记录。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 26;2(2):CD012707. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012707.pub2.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Internet and information technology use in treatment of diabetes.互联网和信息技术在糖尿病治疗中的应用。
Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2010 Feb(166):41-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02277.x.

本文引用的文献

5
Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U.S. in 2017.2017 年美国糖尿病的经济成本。
Diabetes Care. 2018 May;41(5):917-928. doi: 10.2337/dci18-0007. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
6
6. Glycemic Targets: .6. 血糖目标: 。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S55-S64. doi: 10.2337/dc18-S006.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验