Suppr超能文献

比较两种吮吸奶嘴和母亲手指方法对早产儿口腔喂养行为的影响:一项随机临床试验。

Comparison of the effect of two methods of sucking on pacifier and mother's finger on oral feeding behavior in preterm infants: a randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Student Research Committee, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.

Non-Communicable  Pediatric  Disease  Research  Center,  Health  Research  Institute,  School  of  Nursing  and  Midwifery, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2022 May 18;22(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03352-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Oral feeding problems will cause long-term hospitalization of the infant and increase the cost of hospitalization. This study aimed to compare the effect of two methods of sucking on pacifier and mother's finger on oral feeding behavior in preterm infants.

METHODS

This single-blind randomized controlled clinical trial was performed in the neonatal intensive care unit of Babol Rouhani Hospital, Iran. 150 preterm infants with the gestational age of 31 to 33 weeks were selected and were divided into three groups of 50 samples using randomized block method, including non-nutritive sucking on mother's finger (A), pacifier (B) and control (C). Infants in groups A and B were stimulated with mother's finger or pacifier three times a day for five minutes before gavage, for ten days exactly. For data collection, demographic characteristics questionnaire and preterm infant breastfeeding behavior scale were used.

RESULTS

The mean score of breastfeeding behavior in preterm infants in the three groups of A,B,C was 12.34 ± 3.37, 11.00 ± 3.55, 10.40 ± 4.29 respectively, which had a significant difference between the three groups (p = 0.03). The mean rooting score between three groups of A, B, and C was 1.76 ± 0.47, 1.64 ± 0.48, and 1.40 ± 0.90 (p < 0.001) respectively. Also, the mean sucking score in groups of A, B and C was 2.52 ± 0.76, 2.28 ± 0.64 and 2.02 ± 0.74 respectively, which had a significant difference (p = 0.003), but other scales had no significant difference between the three groups (P > 0.05). The mean time to achieve independent oral feeding between the three groups of A, B, C was 22.12 ± 8.15, 22.54 ± 7.54 and 25.86 ± 7.93 days respectively (p = 0.03), and duration of hospitalization was 25.98 ± 6.78, 27.28 ± 6.20, and 29.36 ± 5.97 days (p = 0.02), which had a significant difference. But there was no significant difference between the two groups of A and B in terms of rooting, sucking, the total score of breastfeeding behavior and time of achieving independent oral feeding (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Considering the positive effect of these two methods, especially non-nutritive sucking on mother's finger, on increasing oral feeding behaviors, it is recommended to implement these low-cost methods for preterm infants admitted to neonatal intensive care unit.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial Registration: IRCT, IRCT20191116045460N1 . Registered 11 January 2020- prospective registered.

摘要

背景

口腔喂养问题会导致婴儿长期住院,并增加住院费用。本研究旨在比较非营养性吸吮奶嘴和母亲手指对早产儿口腔喂养行为的影响。

方法

这是一项在伊朗博鲁哈尼医院新生儿重症监护病房进行的单盲随机对照临床试验。选择了胎龄为 31 至 33 周的 150 名早产儿,采用随机区组法分为 3 组,每组 50 例,包括非营养性吸吮母亲手指(A 组)、奶嘴(B 组)和对照组(C 组)。A 组和 B 组的婴儿在鼻饲前每天用母亲的手指或奶嘴刺激 3 次,每次 5 分钟,共 10 天。为了收集数据,使用了人口统计学特征问卷和早产儿母乳喂养行为量表。

结果

三组 A、B、C 早产儿母乳喂养行为评分分别为 12.34±3.37、11.00±3.55、10.40±4.29,三组间差异有统计学意义(P=0.03)。三组 A、B、C 的寻乳评分分别为 1.76±0.47、1.64±0.48、1.40±0.90(P<0.001)。此外,三组 A、B、C 的吸吮评分分别为 2.52±0.76、2.28±0.64 和 2.02±0.74,差异有统计学意义(P=0.003),但三组间其他评分无统计学差异(P>0.05)。三组 A、B、C 达到独立口服喂养的平均时间分别为 22.12±8.15、22.54±7.54 和 25.86±7.93 天(P=0.03),住院时间分别为 25.98±6.78、27.28±6.20 和 29.36±5.97 天(P=0.02),差异有统计学意义。但 A、B 两组在寻乳、吸吮、母乳喂养行为总评分和达到独立口服喂养时间方面无统计学差异(P>0.05)。

结论

考虑到这两种方法,特别是非营养性吸吮母亲手指,对增加口腔喂养行为的积极作用,建议为入住新生儿重症监护病房的早产儿实施这些低成本方法。

试验注册

IRCT,IRCT20191116045460N1。2020 年 1 月 11 日注册-前瞻性注册。

相似文献

2
3
Nonnutritive Sucking at the Mother's Breast Facilitates Oral Feeding Skills in Premature Infants: A Pilot Study.
Adv Neonatal Care. 2019 Apr;19(2):110-117. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000545.
5
Effects of Pacifier Use on Transition Time from Gavage to Breastfeeding in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Breastfeed Med. 2018 Jul/Aug;13(6):433-437. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2018.0031. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
6
Enhancing breastfeeding establishment in preterm infants: A randomized clinical trial of two non-nutritive sucking approaches.
Early Hum Dev. 2021 May;156:105347. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2021.105347. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
8
A pacifier-activated music player with mother's voice improves oral feeding in preterm infants.
Pediatrics. 2014 Mar;133(3):462-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-2547. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
9
KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE BENEFITS OF BREASTFEEDING AND DISADVANTAGES OF THE PACIFIER RELATED TO THE MOTHER'S PRACTICE WITH PRETERM INFANTS.
Rev Paul Pediatr. 2017 Oct-Dec;35(4):399-406. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/;2017;35;4;00005. Epub 2017 Sep 21.

本文引用的文献

1
The effects of premature infant oral motor intervention (PIOMI) on oral feeding of preterm infants: A randomized clinical trial.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 May;120:202-209. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
2
Nonnutritive Sucking at the Mother's Breast Facilitates Oral Feeding Skills in Premature Infants: A Pilot Study.
Adv Neonatal Care. 2019 Apr;19(2):110-117. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000545.
3
Effects of Pacifier Use on Transition Time from Gavage to Breastfeeding in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Breastfeed Med. 2018 Jul/Aug;13(6):433-437. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2018.0031. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
4
The prevalence of feeding problems in children formerly treated in a neonatal intensive care unit.
J Perinatol. 2017 May;37(5):578-584. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.256. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
5
Non-nutritive sucking for increasing physiologic stability and nutrition in preterm infants.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD001071. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001071.pub3.
6
Interventions to improve the oral feeding performance of preterm infants.
Acta Paediatr. 2012 Jul;101(7):e269-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2012.02662.x. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
8
Oral and non-oral sensorimotor interventions enhance oral feeding performance in preterm infants.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011 Sep;53(9):829-835. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04023.x. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
9
Effects of prefeeding oral stimulation on feeding performance of preterm infants.
Indian J Pediatr. 2010 Aug;77(8):869-73. doi: 10.1007/s12098-010-0001-9. Epub 2010 Sep 3.
10
Effects of oral stimulation and oral support on non-nutritive sucking and feeding performance in preterm infants.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007 Jun;49(6):439-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00439.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验