• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

功能状态和医疗保险索赔数据是否能提高电子健康记录死亡率指数的预测准确性?来自全国退伍军人事务队列的研究结果。

Do functional status and Medicare claims data improve the predictive accuracy of an electronic health record mortality index? Findings from a national Veterans Affairs cohort.

机构信息

Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco, 490 Illinois Street, Floor 08, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.

Geriatrics, Palliative and Extended Care Service Line, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2022 May 18;22(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03126-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-022-03126-z
PMID:35585537
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9118715/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Electronic health record (EHR) prediction models may be easier to use in busy clinical settings since EHR data can be auto-populated into models. This study assessed whether adding functional status and/or Medicare claims data (which are often not available in EHRs) improves the accuracy of a previously developed Veterans Affairs (VA) EHR-based mortality index.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of veterans aged 75 years and older enrolled in VA primary care clinics followed from January 2014 to April 2020 (n = 62,014). We randomly split participants into development (n = 49,612) and validation (n = 12,402) cohorts. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. We performed logistic regression with backward stepwise selection to develop a 100-predictor base model using 854 EHR candidate variables, including demographics, laboratory values, medications, healthcare utilization, diagnosis codes, and vitals. We incorporated functional measures in a base + function model by adding activities of daily living (range 0-5) and instrumental activities of daily living (range 0-7) scores. Medicare data, including healthcare utilization (e.g., emergency department visits, hospitalizations) and diagnosis codes, were incorporated in a base + Medicare model. A base + function + Medicare model included all data elements. We assessed model performance with the c-statistic, reclassification metrics, fraction of new information provided, and calibration plots.

RESULTS

In the overall cohort, mean age was 82.6 years and 98.6% were male. At the end of follow-up, 30,263 participants (48.8%) had died. The base model c-statistic was 0.809 (95% CI 0.805-0.812) in the development cohort and 0.804 (95% CI 0.796-0.812) in the validation cohort. Validation cohort c-statistics for the base + function, base + Medicare, and base + function + Medicare models were 0.809 (95% CI 0.801-0.816), 0.811 (95% CI 0.803-0.818), and 0.814 (95% CI 0.807-0.822), respectively. Adding functional status and Medicare data resulted in similarly small improvements among other model performance measures. All models showed excellent calibration.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporation of functional status and Medicare data into a VA EHR-based mortality index led to small but likely clinically insignificant improvements in model performance.

摘要

背景

电子健康记录 (EHR) 预测模型在繁忙的临床环境中可能更容易使用,因为 EHR 数据可以自动填充到模型中。本研究评估了在之前开发的基于退伍军人事务部 (VA) 的 EHR 的死亡率指数中添加功能状态和/或医疗保险索赔数据(通常在 EHR 中不可用)是否可以提高准确性。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了年龄在 75 岁及以上、在 VA 初级保健诊所登记并在 2014 年 1 月至 2020 年 4 月期间随访的退伍军人(n=62014)。我们将参与者随机分为开发(n=49612)和验证(n=12402)队列。主要结局是全因死亡率。我们使用逻辑回归进行向后逐步选择,使用 854 个 EHR 候选变量(包括人口统计学、实验室值、药物、医疗保健利用、诊断代码和生命体征)开发了一个包含 100 个预测因素的基础模型。我们通过添加日常生活活动(范围 0-5)和工具性日常生活活动(范围 0-7)评分,在基础+功能模型中纳入了功能测量。在基础+医疗保险模型中纳入了医疗保险数据,包括医疗保健利用(例如急诊就诊、住院)和诊断代码。基础+功能+医疗保险模型包括所有数据元素。我们使用 c 统计量、重新分类指标、提供的新信息分数和校准图来评估模型性能。

结果

在整个队列中,平均年龄为 82.6 岁,98.6%为男性。随访结束时,30263 名参与者(48.8%)死亡。基础模型的 c 统计量在开发队列中为 0.809(95%CI 0.805-0.812),在验证队列中为 0.804(95%CI 0.796-0.812)。验证队列中基础+功能、基础+医疗保险和基础+功能+医疗保险模型的 c 统计量分别为 0.809(95%CI 0.801-0.816)、0.811(95%CI 0.803-0.818)和 0.814(95%CI 0.807-0.822)。纳入功能状态和医疗保险数据对其他模型性能指标的改善作用相似。所有模型均显示出极好的校准度。

结论

将功能状态和医疗保险数据纳入 VA 基于 EHR 的死亡率指数,可导致模型性能的微小但可能无临床意义的改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75b6/9118715/c4b8c11cdedf/12877_2022_3126_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75b6/9118715/c4b8c11cdedf/12877_2022_3126_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75b6/9118715/c4b8c11cdedf/12877_2022_3126_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Do functional status and Medicare claims data improve the predictive accuracy of an electronic health record mortality index? Findings from a national Veterans Affairs cohort.功能状态和医疗保险索赔数据是否能提高电子健康记录死亡率指数的预测准确性?来自全国退伍军人事务队列的研究结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 May 18;22(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03126-z.
2
Comparing Machine Learning to Regression Methods for Mortality Prediction Using Veterans Affairs Electronic Health Record Clinical Data.使用退伍军人事务部电子健康记录临床数据比较机器学习与回归方法进行死亡率预测。
Med Care. 2022 Jun 1;60(6):470-479. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001720. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
3
Measuring Exposure to Incarceration Using the Electronic Health Record.使用电子健康记录测量监禁暴露。
Med Care. 2019 Jun;57 Suppl 6 Suppl 2(Suppl 6 2):S157-S163. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001049.
4
Dialysis Initiation and Mortality Among Older Veterans With Kidney Failure Treated in Medicare vs the Department of Veterans Affairs.在 Medicare 和 Veterans Affairs 治疗的老年肾衰竭退伍军人中,透析开始与死亡率的比较。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 May 1;178(5):657-664. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0411.
5
Patient-Reported Social and Behavioral Determinants of Health and Estimated Risk of Hospitalization in High-Risk Veterans Affairs Patients.高危退伍军人事务患者的患者报告社会和行为健康决定因素及住院估计风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2021457. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.21457.
6
Dual use of Department of Veterans Affairs and medicare benefits and use of test strips in veterans with type 2 diabetes mellitus.退伍军人事务部和医疗保险的双重使用以及 2 型糖尿病退伍军人的测试条使用。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jan;175(1):26-34. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5405.
7
Artificial intelligence approaches for phenotyping heart failure in U.S. Veterans Health Administration electronic health record.美国退伍军人事务部电子健康记录中基于人工智能的心力衰竭表型分析方法。
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Oct;11(5):3155-3166. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14787. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
8
Dual Receipt of Prescription Opioids From the Department of Veterans Affairs and Medicare Part D and Prescription Opioid Overdose Death Among Veterans: A Nested Case-Control Study.退伍军人事务部和医疗保险部分 D 双重开具处方阿片类药物和退伍军人处方阿片类药物过量死亡:嵌套病例对照研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Apr 2;170(7):433-442. doi: 10.7326/M18-2574. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
9
Dual Use of Department of Veterans Affairs and Medicare Benefits on High-Risk Opioid Prescriptions in Veterans Aged 65 Years and Older: Insights from the VA Musculoskeletal Disorders Cohort.65 岁及以上老年退伍军人中高风险阿片类药物处方的退伍军人事务部和医疗保险福利的双重利用:来自退伍军人事务部肌肉骨骼疾病队列的见解。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec;53 Suppl 3(Suppl Suppl 3):5402-5418. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13060. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
10
Automated computerized intensive care unit severity of illness measure in the Department of Veterans Affairs: preliminary results. SISVistA Investigators. Scrutiny of ICU Severity Veterans Health Sysyems Technology Architecture.美国退伍军人事务部重症监护病房疾病严重程度的自动化计算机测量:初步结果。SISVistA研究人员。对重症监护病房严重程度的退伍军人健康系统技术架构的审查。
Crit Care Med. 2000 Oct;28(10):3540-6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200010000-00033.

引用本文的文献

1
High dimensional predictions of suicide risk in 4.2 million US Veterans using ensemble transfer learning.利用集成迁移学习对 420 万美国退伍军人的自杀风险进行高维预测。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 20;14(1):1793. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51762-9.
2
Performance of the Physical Functioning Activities of Daily Living Scale in the 2020 Medicare Health Outcomes Survey.日常生活活动身体功能量表在 2020 年医疗保险健康结果调查中的表现。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Apr;105(4):696-703. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.11.005. Epub 2023 Nov 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing Machine Learning to Regression Methods for Mortality Prediction Using Veterans Affairs Electronic Health Record Clinical Data.使用退伍军人事务部电子健康记录临床数据比较机器学习与回归方法进行死亡率预测。
Med Care. 2022 Jun 1;60(6):470-479. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001720. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
2
Predicting Life Expectancy to Target Cancer Screening Using Electronic Health Record Clinical Data.利用电子健康记录临床数据预测预期寿命以确定癌症筛查目标。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Feb;37(3):499-506. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07018-7. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
3
Predictive performance of machine and statistical learning methods: Impact of data-generating processes on external validity in the "large N, small p" setting.
机器学习和统计学习方法的预测性能:在“大数据量、小样本量”设置下,数据生成过程对外部有效性的影响。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Jun;30(6):1465-1483. doi: 10.1177/09622802211002867. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
4
A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models.系统评价显示,机器学习在临床预测模型中并未优于逻辑回归。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jun;110:12-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
5
Trends in Health Insurance and Type Among Military Veterans: United States, 2000-2016.医疗保险类型在退伍军人中的变化趋势:美国,2000-2016 年。
Am J Public Health. 2018 Mar;108(3):361-367. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304212. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
6
Individualizing Prevention for Older Adults.为老年人进行个体化预防。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Feb;66(2):229-234. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15216. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
7
Bringing functional status into a big data world: Validation of national Veterans Affairs functional status data.将功能状态引入大数据领域:美国退伍军人事务部国家功能状态数据的验证
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 1;12(6):e0178726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178726. eCollection 2017.
8
Opportunities and challenges in developing risk prediction models with electronic health records data: a systematic review.利用电子健康记录数据开发风险预测模型的机遇与挑战:一项系统综述
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Jan;24(1):198-208. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw042. Epub 2016 May 17.
9
Net reclassification improvement: computation, interpretation, and controversies: a literature review and clinician's guide.净重新分类改善:计算、解释和争议:文献综述及临床医生指南。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Jan 21;160(2):122-31. doi: 10.7326/M13-1522.
10
Predicting risk of hospitalization or death among patients receiving primary care in the Veterans Health Administration.预测在退伍军人健康管理局接受初级保健的患者住院或死亡的风险。
Med Care. 2013 Apr;51(4):368-73. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31827da95a.