• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为老年人进行个体化预防。

Individualizing Prevention for Older Adults.

机构信息

San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco.

Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Feb;66(2):229-234. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15216. Epub 2017 Nov 20.

DOI:10.1111/jgs.15216
PMID:29155445
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5809295/
Abstract

Prevention can help older adults avoid illness by identifying and addressing conditions before they cause symptoms, but prevention can also harm older adults if conditions that are unlikely to cause symptoms in the individual's lifetime are identified and treated. To identify older adults who preventive interventions are most likely to benefit (and most likely to harm), we propose a framework that compares an individual's life expectancy (LE) with the time to benefit (TTB) for an intervention. If LE is less than the TTB, the individual is unlikely to benefit but is exposed to the risks of the intervention, and the intervention should generally NOT be recommended. If LE is longer than the TTB, the individual could benefit, and the intervention should generally be recommended. If LE is similar to the TTB, the individual's values and preferences should be the major determinant of the decision. To facilitate the use of this framework in routine clinical care, we explored ways to estimate LE, identified the TTB for common preventive interventions, and developed strategies for communicating with individuals. We have synthesized these strategies and demonstrate how they can be used to individualize prevention for a hypothetical beneficiary in the setting of a Medicare annual wellness visit. Finally, we place prevention in the context of curative and symptom-oriented care and outline how prevention should be focused on healthier older adults, whereas symptom-oriented care should predominate in sicker older adults.

摘要

预防可以通过在症状出现之前识别和处理疾病来帮助老年人避免疾病,但如果识别和治疗不太可能在个体一生中引起症状的疾病,预防也可能对老年人造成伤害。为了确定预防干预最有可能使(最有可能伤害)的老年人,我们提出了一个框架,该框架将个体的预期寿命(LE)与干预的获益时间(TTB)进行比较。如果 LE 小于 TTB,个体不太可能受益,但会面临干预的风险,一般不建议进行干预。如果 LE 长于 TTB,个体可能受益,一般建议进行干预。如果 LE 与 TTB 相似,个体的价值观和偏好应该是决定的主要因素。为了促进该框架在常规临床护理中的应用,我们探索了估计 LE 的方法,确定了常见预防干预的 TTB,并制定了与个体沟通的策略。我们综合了这些策略,并展示了如何在 Medicare 年度健康访视的背景下将其用于个体化预防。最后,我们将预防置于治疗和以症状为导向的护理背景下,并概述了预防应如何侧重于更健康的老年人,而以症状为导向的护理应在病情更严重的老年人中占主导地位。

相似文献

1
Individualizing Prevention for Older Adults.为老年人进行个体化预防。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Feb;66(2):229-234. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15216. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
2
Older Adults' Views and Communication Preferences About Cancer Screening Cessation.老年人对停止癌症筛查的看法及沟通偏好
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Aug 1;177(8):1121-1128. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1778.
3
Colon cancer screening in U.S. adults aged 65 and older according to life expectancy and age.根据预期寿命和年龄对65岁及以上美国成年人进行结肠癌筛查。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Apr;63(4):750-6. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13335.
4
Primary Care Practitioners' Views on Incorporating Long-term Prognosis in the Care of Older Adults.初级保健从业者对在老年人护理中纳入长期预后的看法。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 May 1;176(5):671-8. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0670.
5
Cancer Screening of Older Adults in Israel According to Life Expectancy: Cross Sectional Study.以色列老年人基于预期寿命的癌症筛查:横断面研究
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Nov;65(11):2539-2544. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15035. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
6
Rationalizing prescribing for older patients with multimorbidity: considering time to benefit.为多病共存的老年患者制定合理的处方:考虑获益时间。
Drugs Aging. 2013 Sep;30(9):655-66. doi: 10.1007/s40266-013-0095-7.
7
Individualizing life expectancy estimates for older adults using the Gompertz Law of Human Mortality.使用人类死亡率的冈珀茨定律对老年人的预期寿命估计进行个体化。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 29;9(9):e108540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108540. eCollection 2014.
8
Assessment of Clinician Decision-making on Cancer Screening Cessation in Older Adults With Limited Life Expectancy.评估临床医生对预期寿命有限的老年癌症筛查终止的决策。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e206772. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.6772.
9
How Do Older Adults Consider Age, Life Expectancy, Quality of Life, and Physician Recommendations When Making Cancer Screening Decisions? Results from a National Survey Using a Discrete Choice Experiment.老年人在做出癌症筛查决策时如何考虑年龄、预期寿命、生活质量和医生建议?基于离散选择实验的全国性调查结果。
Med Decis Making. 2019 Aug;39(6):621-631. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19853516. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
10
[To screen or not to screen after age 75 ?].75岁之后是否进行筛查?
Rev Med Suisse. 2020 Nov 11;16(714):2156-2159.

引用本文的文献

1
Frailty and its association with long-term mortality among community-dwelling older adults aged 75 years and over.75 岁及以上的社区居住老年人的虚弱及其与长期死亡率的关系。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2024 Jul 16;13(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13584-024-00614-y.
2
The role of statin therapy in older adults: best practices and unmet challenges.他汀类药物治疗在老年人中的作用:最佳实践和未满足的挑战。
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2024 Jul;22(7):301-311. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2024.2371968. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
3
Statins, Mortality, and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Among US Veterans With Chronic Kidney Disease.他汀类药物、死亡率与伴有慢性肾脏病的美国退伍军人的主要不良心血管事件。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2346373. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.46373.
4
Deprescribing research in nursing home residents using routinely collected healthcare data: a conceptual framework.使用常规收集的医疗保健数据对养老院居民进行药物减量研究:概念框架。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Aug 4;23(1):469. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04194-5.
5
Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator for Primary Prevention in Asia.亚洲用于一级预防的植入式心脏复律除颤器
JACC Asia. 2023 Mar 7;3(3):321-334. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2022.11.014. eCollection 2023 Jun.
6
Predictors of Adverse Outcomes in Healthy Aging Adults: Coronary Artery Disease, Lower Educational Status and Higher P-Selectin Levels.健康老年人不良结局的预测因素:冠状动脉疾病、较低教育程度和较高 P-选择素水平。
Clin Interv Aging. 2022 Aug 5;17:1173-1185. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S363881. eCollection 2022.
7
Exploration of Symptom Scale as an Outcome for Deprescribing: A Medication Review Study in Nursing Homes.探索症状量表作为减药结果指标:一项养老院药物审查研究
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022 Apr 21;15(5):505. doi: 10.3390/ph15050505.
8
Do functional status and Medicare claims data improve the predictive accuracy of an electronic health record mortality index? Findings from a national Veterans Affairs cohort.功能状态和医疗保险索赔数据是否能提高电子健康记录死亡率指数的预测准确性?来自全国退伍军人事务队列的研究结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 May 18;22(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03126-z.
9
Improving individualized prescription in patients with multimorbidity through medication review.通过药物审查改善多病共存患者的个体化处方。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 May 12;22(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03107-2.
10
Individualized Medication Review in Older People with Multimorbidity: A Comparative Analysis between Patients Living at Home and in a Nursing Home.个体化药物评估在多病共存老年人中的应用:居家和养老院患者的对比分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 14;19(6):3423. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063423.

本文引用的文献

1
Older Adults' Views and Communication Preferences About Cancer Screening Cessation.老年人对停止癌症筛查的看法及沟通偏好
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Aug 1;177(8):1121-1128. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1778.
2
Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 15-years' follow-up of the UK endovascular aneurysm repair trial 1 (EVAR trial 1): a randomised controlled trial.英国血管内动脉瘤修复试验 1(EVAR 试验 1)15 年随访的血管内与开放修复腹主动脉瘤的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2016 Nov 12;388(10058):2366-2374. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31135-7. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
3
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2564-2575. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5989.
4
Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes in Adults Aged ≥75 Years: A Randomized Clinical Trial.强化与标准血压控制对≥75岁成年人心血管疾病结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 28;315(24):2673-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.7050.
5
Aspirin Use for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Colorectal Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.阿司匹林用于心血管疾病和结直肠癌的一级预防:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Jun 21;164(12):836-45. doi: 10.7326/M16-0577. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
6
Estimating the Time to Benefit for Preventive Drugs with the Statistical Process Control Method: An Example with Alendronate.用统计过程控制方法估算预防性药物的获益时间:以阿仑膦酸盐为例
Drugs Aging. 2016 May;33(5):347-53. doi: 10.1007/s40266-016-0344-7.
7
Screening for cancer: advice for high-value care from the American College of Physicians.癌症筛查:美国医师学院提供的高价值医疗保健建议。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 May 19;162(10):718-25. doi: 10.7326/M14-2326.
8
Time to benefit for colorectal cancer screening: survival meta-analysis of flexible sigmoidoscopy trials.结直肠癌筛查的获益时间:乙状结肠镜检查试验的生存荟萃分析
BMJ. 2015 Apr 16;350:h1662. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1662.
9
Safety and benefit of discontinuing statin therapy in the setting of advanced, life-limiting illness: a randomized clinical trial.在晚期、危及生命的疾病背景下停用他汀类药物治疗的安全性和益处:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 May;175(5):691-700. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0289.
10
5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial.经导管主动脉瓣置换术或主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄高危患者的 5 年结果(PARTNER 1):一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2015 Jun 20;385(9986):2477-84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60308-7. Epub 2015 Mar 15.