Cheng Bang, Gu Jiajun
School of Economics and Management, Zhejiang Post and Telecommunication College, Shaoxing, China.
School of Management, Zhejiang Gongshang University Hangzhou College of Commerce, Hangzhou, China.
Front Psychol. 2022 May 2;13:860687. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.860687. eCollection 2022.
The relationship between workaholism and work performance is explored by meta-analysis in this article. After searching relevant references, we had gained 94 individual effect sizes ( = 57,352), 45 individual samples, and 37 references. Through the heterogeneity test, it was shown that the random effect model is more suitable. The main effect analysis showed that there is a significant positive correlation between workaholism, working excessively, working compulsively, and work performance, and further analysis showed that workaholism emphasizes the improvement of contextual performance. The subgroup test showed that the relationship between workaholism, working excessively, working compulsively, and work performance is influenced by the measurement tools of workaholism, but not influenced by the cultural background differences and time-lag research. The above results show that workaholism and its dimensions have different influences on different aspects of work performance. Besides, it is worthy to consider the moderating function of the measurement tools of workaholism in the relationship between workaholism and work performance.
本文通过元分析探讨了工作狂与工作绩效之间的关系。在检索相关参考文献后，我们获得了94个个体效应量（n = 57,352）、45个个体样本和37篇参考文献。通过异质性检验表明，随机效应模型更为合适。主效应分析表明，工作狂、过度工作、强迫性工作与工作绩效之间存在显著正相关，进一步分析表明工作狂强调情境绩效的提升。亚组检验表明，工作狂、过度工作、强迫性工作与工作绩效之间的关系受工作狂测量工具的影响，但不受文化背景差异和时间滞后研究的影响。上述结果表明，工作狂及其维度对工作绩效的不同方面有不同影响。此外，值得考虑工作狂测量工具在工作狂与工作绩效关系中的调节作用。
