Barer Yael, Gurevich Tanya, Chodick Gabriel, Giladi Nir, Gross Ruth, Cohen Raanan, Bergmann Lars, Jalundhwala Yash J, Shalev Varda, Grabarnik-John Meital, Thaler Avner
Maccabitech, Maccabi Institute for Research and Innovation Tel Aviv Israel.
Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Neurology Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center Tel Aviv Israel.
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2022 Apr 29;9(4):458-467. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.13458. eCollection 2022 May.
As Parkinson's disease (PD) progresses, response to oral medications decreases and motor complications appear. Timely intervention has been demonstrated as effective in reducing symptoms. However, current instruments for the identification of these patients are often complicated and inadequate. It has been suggested that anti-PD intensified therapy (IT) can serve as a proxy for increased burden of disease.
To explore whether IT aligns with events reflecting advanced PD (APD) burden.
This was a retrospective analysis of PD beneficiaries in the second-largest healthcare provider in Israel. Patients with PD diagnosed between January 2000 and June 2018 and treated with levodopa (l-dopa) ≥5 times/day and/or ≥1000 mg l-dopa equivalent daily dose were defined as the IT cohort (n = 2037). Treated patients with PD not fulfilling this criterion were defined as the nonintensified therapy (NIT) cohort (n = 3402). Point prevalence and 5- and 10-year cumulative incidence of IT were assessed. Baseline demographic and comorbidities, 1-year healthcare resource use, health costs, and time to clinical events were assessed and compared between cohorts.
IT was associated with significantly ( < 0.05) higher healthcare resource use compared with NIT. In turn, IT patients incurred higher healthcare costs ( < 0.001) and were at greater risk for mortality, hospitalization, disability, and device-aided therapy use ( < 0.001, for all comparisons).
Treatment intensity can serve as an objective and robust indicator of more APD. This readily extractable marker can be easily integrated into electronic medical record alerts to actively target more advanced patients and to guide risk-appropriate care.
随着帕金森病(PD)的进展,口服药物的疗效会降低,运动并发症会出现。及时干预已被证明对减轻症状有效。然而,目前用于识别这些患者的工具往往复杂且不完善。有人提出,抗帕金森病强化治疗(IT)可作为疾病负担加重的一个替代指标。
探讨IT是否与反映晚期帕金森病(APD)负担的事件相符。
这是一项对以色列第二大医疗服务提供商中帕金森病受益患者的回顾性分析。2000年1月至2018年6月期间被诊断为帕金森病且左旋多巴(l-多巴)治疗次数≥5次/天和/或左旋多巴等效日剂量≥1000mg的患者被定义为IT队列(n = 2037)。未达到该标准的接受治疗的帕金森病患者被定义为非强化治疗(NIT)队列(n = 3402)。评估IT的点患病率以及5年和10年累积发病率。评估并比较队列之间的基线人口统计学和合并症、1年医疗资源使用情况、医疗费用以及临床事件发生时间。
与NIT相比,IT与显著更高的医疗资源使用相关(P < 0.05)。相应地,IT患者产生更高的医疗费用(P < 0.001),并且在死亡、住院、残疾和使用器械辅助治疗方面的风险更高(所有比较的P < 0.001)。
治疗强度可作为更严重APD的一个客观且可靠的指标。这个易于提取的标志物可以很容易地整合到电子病历警报中,以积极针对病情更严重的患者并指导适当的风险护理。