• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别、性别认同和地理归属中的偏见放大。

Bias Amplification in Gender, Gender Identity, and Geographical Affiliation.

机构信息

Department of Chemistry and Hylleraas Centre for Quantum Molecular Sciences, University of Oslo, P. O. Box 1033, Blindern 0315, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Chemistry, University of São Paulo 14040-901 Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Chem Inf Model. 2022 Dec 26;62(24):6297-6301. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00533. Epub 2022 May 19.

DOI:10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00533
PMID:35587272
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9795548/
Abstract

In the quest for greater equity in science, individual attitudes and institutional policies should also embrace greater diversity and inclusion of minority groups. This viewpoint calls for a broader definition of gender bias in STEM to include gender identity and for increased attention to the issue of bias amplification due to geographic affiliation in the field of computational chemistry and chemoinformatics. It briefly discusses some active interventions to tackle bias on gender, gender identity, and geographic affiliation in STEM.

摘要

在追求科学领域更大公平性的过程中,个体态度和机构政策也应更加包容少数群体,体现多样性。这种观点要求对 STEM 中的性别偏见有更广泛的定义,将性别认同包括在内,并更加关注由于在计算化学和化学信息学领域的地理位置联系而导致的偏见放大问题。本文简要讨论了一些积极干预措施,以解决 STEM 领域中性别、性别认同和地理位置联系方面的偏见问题。

相似文献

1
Bias Amplification in Gender, Gender Identity, and Geographical Affiliation.性别、性别认同和地理归属中的偏见放大。
J Chem Inf Model. 2022 Dec 26;62(24):6297-6301. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00533. Epub 2022 May 19.
2
Gender Bias and the Lack of Equity in Pandemic Nursing in China: A Qualitative Study.中国疫情护理中的性别偏见与公平缺失:定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 29;18(19):10273. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910273.
3
Overcoming gender bias in STEM.克服 STEM 领域的性别偏见。
Trends Immunol. 2024 Jul;45(7):483-485. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2024.05.004. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
4
Gender Stereotypes and Discrimination: How Sexism Impacts Development.性别刻板印象与歧视:性别歧视如何影响发展。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2016;50:105-33. doi: 10.1016/bs.acdb.2015.11.001. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
5
Perceptions of Same-Sex Relationships and Marriage as Gender Role Violations: An Examination of Gendered Expectations (Sexism).将同性关系和婚姻视为违反性别角色的观念:对性别化期望(性别歧视)的考察。
J Homosex. 2015;62(11):1576-98. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2015.1073038. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
6
Persistence of gender biases in Europe.欧洲性别偏见的持续存在。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Mar 21;120(12):e2213266120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2213266120. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
7
[Gender bias in medicine].[医学中的性别偏见]
Acta Med Port. 2011 Nov-Dec;24(6):975-86. Epub 2012 Feb 20.
8
An ambivalent alliance. Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality.一种矛盾的联盟。敌意性别歧视和善意性别歧视作为性别不平等的互补性理由。
Am Psychol. 2001 Feb;56(2):109-18.
9
A global call for action to include gender in research impact assessment.一项将性别因素纳入研究影响评估的全球行动呼吁。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Jul 19;14(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0126-z.
10
Has a critical mass of women resulted in gender equity in gynecologic surgery?女性是否已达到临界质量,从而实现妇科手术中的性别平等?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;223(5):665-673. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.038. Epub 2020 Jun 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Out in Inorganic Chemistry: A Celebration of LGBTQIAPN+ Inorganic Chemists.《无机化学界之外:对LGBTQIAPN+无机化学家的颂扬》
Inorg Chem. 2022 Apr 11;61(14):5435-5441. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00729.
2
Gender and geographical disparity in editorial boards of journals in psychology and neuroscience.心理学与神经科学期刊编辑委员会中的性别和地域差异。
Nat Neurosci. 2022 Mar;25(3):272-279. doi: 10.1038/s41593-022-01012-w. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
3
Systemic inequalities for LGBTQ professionals in STEM.STEM领域中LGBTQ专业人士面临的系统性不平等。
Sci Adv. 2021 Jan 15;7(3). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe0933. Print 2021 Jan.
4
How LGBT+ scientists would like to be included and welcomed in STEM workplaces.LGBT+科学家希望如何在STEM工作场所中被接纳和受到欢迎。
Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7831):813-816. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-02949-3.
5
A Healthier Peer Review Process Would Improve Diversity.更健康的同行评审过程将促进多样性。
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020 Sep 16;12(37):40987-40989. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c11528. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
6
Gender and other potential biases in peer review: cross-sectional analysis of 38 250 external peer review reports.同行评审中的性别及其他潜在偏见:对38250份外部同行评审报告的横断面分析
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 20;10(8):e035058. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035058.
7
Female Faculty: Why So Few and Why Care?女性教职员工:为什么这么少,为什么要关心?
Chemistry. 2020 Jul 8;26(38):8319-8323. doi: 10.1002/chem.202002522. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
8
Is there a gender gap in chemical sciences scholarly communication?化学科学学术交流中存在性别差异吗?
Chem Sci. 2020 Jan 28;11(8):2277-2301. doi: 10.1039/c9sc04090k. eCollection 2020 Feb 28.
9
The troubles with peer review for allocating research funding: Funders need to experiment with versions of peer review and decision-making.同行评议在分配研究资金方面存在的问题:资助者需要尝试不同版本的同行评议和决策制定。
EMBO Rep. 2019 Dec 5;20(12):e49472. doi: 10.15252/embr.201949472. Epub 2019 Nov 3.
10
Does Gender Bias Still Affect Women in Science?性别偏见是否仍在影响科学界的女性?
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2019 Jul 17;83(3). doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00018-19. Print 2019 Aug 21.