Suppr超能文献

大流行应对能力:COVID-19 期间社交距离和封锁政策的证据。

Pandemic responsiveness: Evidence from social distancing and lockdown policy during COVID-19.

机构信息

Department of Economics, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, England, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 May 19;17(5):e0267611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267611. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

We study changes in social distancing and government policy in response to local outbreaks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using aggregated county-level data from approximately 20 million smartphones in the United States, we show that social distancing behaviors have responded to local outbreaks: a 1% increase in new cases (deaths) is associated with a 3% (11%) increase in social distancing intensity. Responsiveness is reinforced by the presence of public measures restricting movements, but remains significant in their absence. Responsiveness is higher in high-income, more educated, or Democrat-leaning counties, and in counties with low health insurance coverage. By contrast, social capital and vulnerability to infection are strongly associated with more social distancing but not with more responsiveness. Our results point to the importance of politics, trust and reciprocity for compliance with social distancing, while material constraints are more critical for being responsive to new risks such as the emergence of variants.

摘要

我们研究了 COVID-19 大流行期间,针对局部疫情,社会疏离和政府政策的变化。我们使用来自美国大约 2000 万部智能手机的聚合县级数据,表明社会隔离行为对局部疫情做出了响应:新病例(死亡)增加 1%,与社会隔离强度增加 3%(11%)相关。公共措施限制流动的存在加强了响应,但在没有这些措施的情况下,响应仍然显著。在高收入、受教育程度更高或倾向民主党的县,以及医疗保险覆盖率较低的县,响应性更高。相比之下,社会资本和感染的脆弱性与更多的社会隔离有关,但与更高的响应性无关。我们的研究结果表明,政治、信任和互惠对于遵守社会隔离措施非常重要,而物质约束对于应对新的风险(如变异的出现)更为关键。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57d2/9119550/d2b8ca865857/pone.0267611.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验