Bingley William J, Tran Anh, Boyd Candice P, Gibson Kari, Kalokerinos Elise K, Koval Peter, Kashima Yoshihisa, McDonald Dianna, Greenaway Katharine H
Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne.
School of Geography, University of Melbourne.
Am Psychol. 2022 Oct;77(7):812-821. doi: 10.1037/amp0001012. Epub 2022 May 19.
Climate change anxiety is a growing problem for individual well-being the world over. However, psychological interventions to address climate change anxiety may have unintended effects on outcomes other than individual well-being, such as group cohesion and pro-environmental behavior. In order to address these complexities, we outline a multiple needs framework of climate change anxiety interventions, which can be used to analyze interventions in terms of their effects on individual, social, and environmental outcomes. We use this framework to contextualize a systematic review of the literature detailing the effects of climate change anxiety interventions. This analysis identifies interventions centered around problem-focused action, emotion management, and enhancing social connections as those which have beneficial effects on the widest range of outcomes. It also identifies interventions that may have detrimental effects on one or more outcomes. We identify gaps where more research is required, including research that assesses the effects of climate change anxiety interventions on individual, social, and environmental outcomes in concert. An interactive website summarizes these insights and presents the results of the systematic review in a way that is, accessible to a range of stakeholders. The multiple needs framework provides a way to conceptualize the effectiveness of climate change anxiety interventions beyond their impact on individual well-being, contributing to a more holistic understanding of the effects of this global phenomenon. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
气候变化焦虑对全球个人福祉而言是一个日益严重的问题。然而，应对气候变化焦虑的心理干预措施可能会对个人福祉之外的其他结果产生意想不到的影响，比如群体凝聚力和亲环境行为。为了解决这些复杂问题，我们概述了一个气候变化焦虑干预的多重需求框架，该框架可用于根据干预措施对个人、社会和环境结果的影响来分析这些干预措施。我们使用这个框架来将对详细阐述气候变化焦虑干预效果的文献的系统综述置于具体情境中。该分析确定了围绕以问题为中心的行动、情绪管理和加强社会联系的干预措施，这些措施对最广泛的结果具有有益影响。它还确定了可能对一个或多个结果产生不利影响的干预措施。我们确定了需要更多研究的空白领域，包括评估气候变化焦虑干预措施对个人、社会和环境结果综合影响的研究。一个交互式网站总结了这些见解，并以一系列利益相关者都能理解的方式展示了系统综述的结果。这个多重需求框架提供了一种方法，能够在气候变化焦虑干预措施对个人福祉的影响之外，对其有效性进行概念化，有助于更全面地理解这一全球现象的影响。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2022美国心理学会，保留所有权利）
