Department of Psychology.
Department of Educational and Counseling Psychology.
J Couns Psychol. 2022 Oct;69(5):656-666. doi: 10.1037/cou0000621. Epub 2022 May 19.
We used a longitudinal actor-partner interdependence model to examine the codeveloping alliance in alliance empowerment therapy (AET; Escudero, 2013), a manualized team-based approach developed in Spain specifically for child welfare-involved youth. In this first evaluation of AET, we sampled 102 adolescents, 83% of whom had been removed from their homes due to abuse or neglect, and 40% of whom were in crisis at the time of referral. Before each session, clients rated their improvement-so-far; after each session, both clients and therapists completed a brief alliance measure, an adaptation of the System for Observing Family Therapy Alliances (SOFTA-s; Friedlander et al., 2006) for individual therapy. In terms of outcome, clients' improvement ratings were significantly associated with posttreatment changes in overall functioning and personal goal attainment. With respect to the change process, growth was observed in both clients' and therapists' ratings of the alliance over 12 sessions, and an increased similarity in alliance ratings was due to more rapid growth in the therapists' ratings than the clients' ratings. Dynamic structural equation modeling indicated that at higher levels of adolescent goal attainment, a stronger association was observed between increased therapist-rated alliance and goal attainment. In other words, in the most effective cases, therapists were more responsive to how the adolescents seemed to have experienced the alliance in the previous session. The cocreated alliance perceptions were due to therapist (rather than client) responsiveness, as well as to unspecified aspects of sharing a therapy environment over time, such as familiarity with the process, regular meetings, and so on. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
我们采用纵向演员-伙伴相互依存模型来检验联盟赋能疗法(AET;Escudero,2013)中的联盟发展情况,AET 是一种在西班牙开发的基于团队的手册化方法,专门针对涉及儿童福利的青年。在对 AET 的首次评估中,我们抽取了 102 名青少年作为样本,其中 83%的人因虐待或忽视而被带离家庭,40%的人在转介时处于危机之中。在每次治疗前,客户都会评估他们的进展;在每次治疗后,客户和治疗师都会完成一份简短的联盟评估,这是对家庭治疗联盟观察系统(SOFTA-s;Friedlander 等人,2006)的改编,适用于个体治疗。在结果方面,客户的改善评分与治疗后整体功能和个人目标达成的变化显著相关。就变化过程而言,在 12 次治疗中,客户和治疗师对联盟的评分都有所增长,而且治疗师评分的增长速度快于客户评分,这导致了联盟评分的相似性增加。动态结构方程模型表明,在青少年目标达成水平较高的情况下,治疗师评分较高的联盟与目标达成之间的关联更为显著。换句话说,在最有效的情况下,治疗师更能响应青少年在前一次治疗中对联盟的体验。共同创造的联盟认知是由治疗师(而不是客户)的响应性以及随着时间的推移共同分享治疗环境的未指定方面(例如对过程的熟悉程度、定期会议等)所导致的。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。