Koval Peter, Kalokerinos Elise K, Greenaway Katharine H, Medland Hayley, Kuppens Peter, Nezlek John B, Hinton Jordan D X, Gross James J
Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences.
Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences.
Emotion. 2023 Mar;23(2):357-374. doi: 10.1037/emo0001097. Epub 2022 May 19.
Recent theory conceptualizes emotion regulation as occurring across three stages: (a) identifying the need to regulate, (b) selecting a strategy, and (c) implementing that strategy to modify emotions. Yet, measurement of emotion regulation has not kept pace with these theoretical advances. In particular, widely used global self-report questionnaires are often assumed to index people's typical strategy selection tendencies. However, it is unclear how well global self-reports capture individual differences in strategy selection and/or whether they may also index other emotion regulation stages. To address this issue, we examined how global self-report measures correspond with the three stages of emotion regulation as modeled using daily life data. We analyzed data from nine daily diary and experience sampling studies (total = 1,097), in which participants provided daily and global self-reports of cognitive reappraisal, expressive suppression, and rumination. We found only weak-to-moderate correlations between global self-reports and average daily self-reports of each regulation strategy (indexing strategy selection). Global self-reports also correlated with individual differences in the degree to which (a) preceding affect experience predicted regulation strategies (representing the identification stage), and (b) regulation strategies predicted subsequent changes in affective experience (representing the implementation stage). Our findings suggest that global self-report measures of reappraisal, suppression, and rumination may not strongly and uniquely correlate with individual differences in daily selection of these strategies. Moreover, global self-report measures may also index individual differences in the perceived need to regulate, and the affective consequences of regulation in daily life. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
(a)识别调节的需求,(b)选择一种策略,以及(c)实施该策略以改变情绪。然而,情绪调节的测量并未跟上这些理论进展。特别是,广泛使用的总体自我报告问卷通常被假定为可索引人们典型的策略选择倾向。然而,尚不清楚总体自我报告在多大程度上能够捕捉策略选择中的个体差异,以及它们是否也可能索引其他情绪调节阶段。为解决这一问题,我们研究了总体自我报告测量与使用日常生活数据建模的情绪调节三个阶段之间的对应关系。我们分析了来自九项日常日记和经验抽样研究的数据(总计 = 1097),其中参与者提供了关于认知重评、表达抑制和反刍的每日及总体自我报告。我们发现总体自我报告与每种调节策略的每日平均自我报告(索引策略选择)之间仅存在弱至中度的相关性。总体自我报告还与以下方面的个体差异相关:(a)先前的情感体验预测调节策略的程度(代表识别阶段),以及(b)调节策略预测随后情感体验变化的程度(代表实施阶段)。我们的研究结果表明,关于重评、抑制和反刍的总体自我报告测量可能与这些策略的日常选择中的个体差异没有强烈且独特的相关性。此外,总体自我报告测量还可能索引在感知到的调节需求以及日常生活中调节的情感后果方面的个体差异。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2023美国心理学会,保留所有权利)