Mosannenzadeh Farnaz, Luijten Maartje, MacIejewski Dominique F, Wiewel Grace V, Karremans Johan C
Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, 6525 XZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, 5037 AB Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Aug 27;14(9):758. doi: 10.3390/bs14090758.
Adults with attachment insecurity often struggle in romantic relationships due to difficulties in emotion regulation (ER). One potentially influential yet understudied factor is the inflexible over-reliance on either intrapersonal (self-directed, e.g., suppression) or interpersonal (involving others, e.g., sharing) ER. This study investigates the association between attachment insecurity and flexibility in using interpersonal versus intrapersonal ER in response to daily stressors in romantic relationships. We hypothesized that higher attachment avoidance and anxiety are associated with (H1) higher reliance on either intrapersonal or interpersonal ER over the other, respectively; (H2) less variable use of interpersonal compared to intrapersonal ER over time; and (H3) less flexible use of interpersonal compared to intrapersonal ER depending on the availability of a romantic partner. Study 1 ( = 174; 133 females, = 23.79, = 7.63) used an online cross-sectional survey to measure average inter/intrapersonal ER, addressing H1. Study 2 ( = 124; 104 females, = 22.45, = 6.39), combined a baseline survey with experience sampling (7 days, 8 notifications/day), addressing H1, H2, and H3. Results showed that higher attachment avoidance was associated with lower interpersonal compared to intrapersonal ER. Higher attachment anxiety was associated with less variable use of interpersonal compared to intrapersonal ER and less flexible use of interpersonal ER depending on partner availability. These findings suggest distinct associations between attachment orientations and ER flexibility, explaining ER difficulties in individuals with high attachment insecurity.
由于情绪调节(ER)方面的困难,具有依恋不安全感的成年人在浪漫关系中常常挣扎。一个潜在有影响力但研究不足的因素是对内部(自我导向,例如抑制)或人际(涉及他人,例如分享)情绪调节的僵化过度依赖。本研究调查了依恋不安全感与在浪漫关系中应对日常压力源时使用人际与内部情绪调节的灵活性之间的关联。我们假设较高的依恋回避和焦虑分别与(H1)对内部或人际情绪调节中一方的更高依赖相关;(H2)随着时间推移,与内部情绪调节相比,人际情绪调节的使用变化较少;以及(H3)根据浪漫伴侣的可及性,与内部情绪调节相比,人际情绪调节的使用灵活性较低。研究1(n = 174;133名女性,M = 23.79,SD = 7.63)使用在线横断面调查来测量平均人际/内部情绪调节,以验证H1。研究2(n = 124;104名女性,M = 22.45,SD = 6.39)将基线调查与经验取样(7天,每天8次通知)相结合,以验证H1、H2和H3。结果表明,与内部情绪调节相比,较高的依恋回避与较低的人际情绪调节相关。较高的依恋焦虑与随着时间推移人际情绪调节的使用变化较少以及根据伴侣可及性人际情绪调节的使用灵活性较低相关。这些发现表明依恋取向与情绪调节灵活性之间存在不同的关联,解释了高依恋不安全感个体的情绪调节困难。