• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情期间意大利在线心理健康社区中的错误信息:一项内容分析研究方案

Misinformation in Italian Online Mental Health Communities During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Protocol for a Content Analysis Study.

作者信息

Bizzotto Nicole, Morlino Susanna, Schulz Peter Johannes

机构信息

Faculty of Communication, Culture and Society, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.

Department of Communication and Media, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 May 20;11(5):e35347. doi: 10.2196/35347.

DOI:10.2196/35347
PMID:35594142
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9166639/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Social media platforms are widely used by people suffering from mental illnesses to cope with their conditions. One modality of coping with these conditions is navigating online communities where people can receive emotional support and informational advice. Benefits have been documented in terms of impact on health outcomes. However, the pitfalls are still unknown, as not all content is necessarily helpful or correct. Furthermore, the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic and related problems, such as worsening mental health symptoms, the dissemination of conspiracy narratives, and medical distrust, may have impacted these online communities. The situation in Italy is of particular interest, being the first Western country to experience a nationwide lockdown. Particularly during this challenging time, the beneficial role of community moderators with professional mental health expertise needs to be investigated in terms of uncovering misleading information and regulating communities.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the proposed study is to investigate the potentially harmful content found in online communities for mental health symptoms in the Italian language. Besides descriptive information about the content that posts and comments address, this study aims to analyze the content from two viewpoints. The first one compares expert-led and peer-led communities, focusing on differences in misinformation. The second one unravels the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, not by merely investigating differences in topics but also by investigating the needs expressed by community members.

METHODS

A codebook for the content analysis of Facebook communities has been developed, and a content analysis will be conducted on bundles of posts. Among 14 Facebook groups that were interested in participating in this study, two groups were selected for analysis: one was being moderated by a health professional (n=12,058 members) and one was led by peers (n=5598 members). Utterances from 3 consecutive calendar years will be studied by comparing the months from before the pandemic, the months during the height of the pandemic, and the months during the postpandemic phase (2019-2021). This method permits the identification of different types of misinformation and the context in which they emerge. Ethical approval was obtained by the Università della Svizzera italiana ethics committee.

RESULTS

The usability of the codebook was demonstrated with a pretest. Subsequently, 144 threads (1534 utterances) were coded by the two coders. Intercoder reliability was calculated on 293 units (19.10% of the total sample; Krippendorff α=.94, range .72-1). Aside from a few analyses comparing bundles, individual utterances will constitute the unit of analysis in most cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This content analysis will identify deleterious content found in online mental health support groups, the potential role of moderators in uncovering misleading information, and the impact of COVID-19 on the content.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/35347.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fea/9166639/ad303f52f32a/resprot_v11i5e35347_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fea/9166639/ad303f52f32a/resprot_v11i5e35347_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fea/9166639/ad303f52f32a/resprot_v11i5e35347_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

患有精神疾病的人广泛使用社交媒体平台来应对自身状况。应对这些状况的一种方式是在在线社区中交流,人们可以在那里获得情感支持和信息建议。已有文献记载了其对健康结果的益处。然而,其中的陷阱仍然未知,因为并非所有内容都一定有用或正确。此外,新冠疫情的出现以及相关问题,如心理健康症状恶化、阴谋论的传播和对医学的不信任,可能对这些在线社区产生了影响。意大利的情况尤其值得关注,因为它是第一个经历全国范围封锁的西方国家。特别是在这个充满挑战的时期,需要研究具有专业心理健康专业知识的社区管理员在揭露误导性信息和管理社区方面的有益作用。

目的

本拟议研究的目的是调查意大利语在线社区中发现的与心理健康症状相关的潜在有害内容。除了关于帖子和评论所涉及内容的描述性信息外,本研究旨在从两个角度分析内容。第一个角度比较由专家主导和由同伴主导的社区,重点关注错误信息的差异。第二个角度揭示新冠疫情的影响,不仅通过调查主题差异,还通过调查社区成员表达的需求。

方法

已开发出用于对脸书社区进行内容分析的编码手册,并将对帖子集进行内容分析。在14个有兴趣参与本研究的脸书群组中,选择了两个群组进行分析:一个由健康专业人员管理(n = 12,058名成员),一个由同伴主导(n = 5598名成员)。将通过比较疫情前、疫情高峰期和疫情后阶段(2019 - 2021年)的月份,研究连续3个日历年的言论。这种方法有助于识别不同类型的错误信息及其出现的背景。获得了意大利瑞士大学伦理委员会的伦理批准。

结果

通过预测试证明了编码手册的可用性。随后,两名编码员对144个主题帖(1534条言论)进行了编码。对293个单元计算了编码员间信度(占总样本的19.10%;克里彭多夫α系数 = 0.94,范围为0.72 - 1)。除了一些比较帖子集的分析外,在大多数情况下,单个言论将构成分析单元。

结论

本内容分析将识别在线心理健康支持群组中发现的有害内容、管理员在揭露误导性信息方面的潜在作用以及新冠疫情对内容的影响。

国际注册报告识别码(IRRID):PRR1 - 10.2196/35347。

相似文献

1
Misinformation in Italian Online Mental Health Communities During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Protocol for a Content Analysis Study.新冠疫情期间意大利在线心理健康社区中的错误信息:一项内容分析研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 May 20;11(5):e35347. doi: 10.2196/35347.
2
The "Loci" of Misinformation and Its Correction in Peer- and Expert-Led Online Communities for Mental Health: Content Analysis.错误信息的“病灶”及其在心理健康同行和专家主导的在线社区中的纠正:内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 18;25:e44656. doi: 10.2196/44656.
3
Help-Seeking, Support, and Engagement in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Online Communities on Facebook: Content Analysis.在脸书上的妊娠期糖尿病在线社区中寻求帮助、获得支持与参与情况:内容分析
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Feb 26;8:e49494. doi: 10.2196/49494.
4
Changes in Language Style and Topics in an Online Eating Disorder Community at the Beginning of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Observational Study.新冠疫情大流行初期在线饮食失调症社区中语言风格和主题的变化:观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 8;23(7):e28346. doi: 10.2196/28346.
5
Analyses of posts written in online eating disorder and depression/anxiety moderated communities: Emotional and informational communication before and during the COVID-19 outbreak.对在线饮食失调以及抑郁症/焦虑症互助社区中所发布内容的分析:新冠疫情爆发前及期间的情感与信息交流
Internet Interv. 2021 Jul 27;26:100438. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100438. eCollection 2021 Dec.
6
Peer-to-Peer Health Communication in Older Adults' Online Communities: Protocol for a Qualitative Netnographic Study and Co-Design Approach.老年人在线社区中的对等健康交流:定性网络民族志研究与协同设计方法方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Sep 14;9(9):e19834. doi: 10.2196/19834.
7
Buffering against exposure to mental health misinformation in online communities on Facebook: the interplay of depression literacy and expert moderation.在 Facebook 在线社区中缓冲心理健康错误信息的暴露:抑郁素养和专家调解的相互作用。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 18;23(1):1577. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16404-1.
8
Effects of an Online Community Peer-support Intervention on COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation Among Essential Workers: Mixed-methods Analysis.在线社区同伴支持干预对一线工作者中 COVID-19 疫苗错误信息的影响:混合方法分析。
West J Emerg Med. 2023 Feb 27;24(2):264-268. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2023.1.57253.
9
The Role of Moderators in Facilitating and Encouraging Peer-to-Peer Support in an Online Mental Health Community: A Qualitative Exploratory Study.主持人在促进和鼓励在线心理健康社区中同伴支持方面的作用:一项定性探索性研究。
J Technol Behav Sci. 2023;8(2):128-139. doi: 10.1007/s41347-023-00302-9. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
10
Emotions of COVID-19: Content Analysis of Self-Reported Information Using Artificial Intelligence.COVID-19 情绪:使用人工智能进行自我报告信息的内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 30;23(4):e27341. doi: 10.2196/27341.

引用本文的文献

1
Clusters of Patient Empowerment and Mental Health Literacy Differentiate Professional Help-Seeking Attitudes in Online Mental Health Communities Users.患者赋权与心理健康素养集群区分在线心理健康社区用户的专业求助态度。
Health Expect. 2025 Feb;28(1):e70153. doi: 10.1111/hex.70153.
2
Assessment of users' behavior in Lithuanian online communities.立陶宛在线社区中用户行为的评估。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 3;14:1265341. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1265341. eCollection 2023.
3
The "Loci" of Misinformation and Its Correction in Peer- and Expert-Led Online Communities for Mental Health: Content Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
The Exchange of Informational Support in Online Health Communities at the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Content Analysis.新冠疫情初期在线健康社区中的信息支持交流:内容分析
JMIRx Med. 2021 Jul 22;2(3):e27485. doi: 10.2196/27485. eCollection 2021 Jul-Sep.
2
Perception of peer advice in online health communities: Access to lay expertise.在线健康社区中对同行建议的感知:获取非专业知识。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 May;277:113117. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113117. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
3
Effects of lockdown on emergency room admissions for psychiatric evaluation: an observational study from the AUSL Romagna, Italy.
错误信息的“病灶”及其在心理健康同行和专家主导的在线社区中的纠正:内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 18;25:e44656. doi: 10.2196/44656.
4
Buffering against exposure to mental health misinformation in online communities on Facebook: the interplay of depression literacy and expert moderation.在 Facebook 在线社区中缓冲心理健康错误信息的暴露:抑郁素养和专家调解的相互作用。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 18;23(1):1577. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16404-1.
5
Mining and analysing online social networks: Studying the dynamics of digital peer support.挖掘与分析在线社交网络:研究数字同伴支持的动态变化
MethodsX. 2023 Jan 7;10:102005. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102005. eCollection 2023.
封锁对精神科评估急诊入院的影响:来自意大利 AUSL 罗曼尼亚的观察性研究。
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2021 Jun;25(2):135-139. doi: 10.1080/13651501.2020.1859120. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
4
Social Media Insights Into US Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Analysis of Twitter Data.社交媒体洞察美国在 COVID-19 大流行期间的心理健康状况:对 Twitter 数据的纵向分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 14;22(12):e21418. doi: 10.2196/21418.
5
The COVID-19 Outbreak and Subjects With Mental Disorders Who Presented to an Italian Psychiatric Emergency Department.《COVID-19 疫情期间意大利精神科急诊就诊的精神障碍患者》
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2021 Apr 1;209(4):246-250. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001289.
6
Using Online Support Communities for Tourette Syndrome and Tic Disorders: Online Survey of Users' Experiences.使用在线支持社区治疗妥瑞氏症和抽动障碍:用户体验的在线调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 3;22(11):e18099. doi: 10.2196/18099.
7
Public Perception of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Twitter: Sentiment Analysis and Topic Modeling Study.公众对 Twitter 上 COVID-19 大流行的看法:情感分析和主题建模研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Nov 11;6(4):e21978. doi: 10.2196/21978.
8
Correction as a Solution for Health Misinformation on Social Media.纠正作为解决社交媒体上健康错误信息的一种方法。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Oct;110(S3):S278-S280. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305916.
9
Pre/post comparison study of emergency mental health visits during the COVID-19 lockdown in Lombardy, Italy.意大利伦巴第地区新冠疫情封锁期间紧急心理健康就诊情况的前后对比研究。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2020 Nov;74(11):605-607. doi: 10.1111/pcn.13126. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
10
Examining Social Capital, Social Support, and Language Use in an Online Depression Forum: Social Network and Content Analysis.在线抑郁症论坛中的社会资本、社会支持与语言使用研究:社会网络与内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 24;22(6):e17365. doi: 10.2196/17365.