Faculdade de Ciências, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia do Desenvolvimento e Aprendizagem, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP), Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Instituto para a Valorização da Educação e da Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2022 Nov-Dec;98(6):641-647. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2022.01.007. Epub 2022 May 20.
The present study aims to analyze the validity of evidence and internal consistency of an inventory for assessing parenting practices during early childhood.
Participants were 857 mothers of one-to-42-months children recruited in three cities in the Southeast region and one city in the Midwest region of Brazil. The participants answered a sociodemographic questionnaire with maternal and child data, and the Parenting Styles Inventory for Mothers of Babies (IEPMB). The IEPMB includes 25 questions about positive and negative parenting practices that mothers use to raise their children. An exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was conducted using the following criteria to indicate adequate model fit: root-mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA) < .08; standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) < .09; comparative fit index (CFI) > 0.90. For the hypothesis-testing method, a comparison between groups using a student's t-test based on the child's age (infants vs. toddlers) and mother's age (adolescents vs. adults) was carried out.
The final 11 items model of the measure revealed an adequate overall model fit (RMSEA = 0.04; SRMR = 0.04; CFI = 0.94). The items were grouped into three constructs: Aggressiveness and Emotional Dysregulation, Relaxed Discipline, and Positive Monitoring. Adolescent mothers reported less positive monitoring than adult mothers (p < 0.001). Mothers of toddlers reported more aggressiveness/emotional dysregulation (p < 0.001) and relaxed discipline (p = 0.05) than mothers of infants.
The instrument named from this study as the Parenting Practices Inventory for Mothers of Babies showed evidence for measuring mothers' parenting practices in early childhood and allows the identification of parents who need support.
本研究旨在分析评估婴幼儿期父母养育实践的量表的证据效度和内部一致性。
参与者为来自巴西东南部三个城市和中西部一个城市的 857 名 1 至 42 月龄儿童的母亲。参与者回答了一份社会人口学问卷,其中包括母亲和儿童的数据,以及婴儿期母亲养育方式量表(IEPMB)。IEPMB 包括 25 个关于母亲用来养育孩子的积极和消极养育实践的问题。使用以下标准进行探索性和验证性因素分析,以表明适当的模型拟合:近似均方根误差(RMSEA)<0.08;标准化根均方残差(SRMR)<0.09;比较拟合指数(CFI)>0.90。对于假设检验方法,根据儿童年龄(婴儿与幼儿)和母亲年龄(青少年与成人),使用基于学生 t 检验的组间比较进行。
该测量的最终 11 项模型显示出适当的总体模型拟合(RMSEA=0.04;SRMR=0.04;CFI=0.94)。这些项目被分为三个构念:攻击性和情绪失调、宽松纪律和积极监控。青少年母亲的积极监控报告少于成年母亲(p<0.001)。幼儿母亲的攻击性/情绪失调(p<0.001)和宽松纪律(p=0.05)报告多于婴儿母亲。
从这项研究中命名的婴儿期母亲养育实践量表显示了衡量母亲在婴幼儿期养育实践的证据,并允许识别需要支持的父母。