Laboratory for Clinical and Experimental Research on Vascular Biology, Rio de Janeiro State University, RJ, Brazil.
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2022;82(1):13-26. doi: 10.3233/CH-221395.
Changes in muscle mass, strength, vascular function, oxidative stress, and inflammatory biomarkers were compared in older adults after resistance training (RT) performed with low-intensity without blood flow restriction (RT-CON); low-intensity with BFR (RT-BFR); and high-intensity without BFR (RT-HI).
Thirty-two untrained individuals (72±7 y) performed a 12-week RT after being randomized into three groups: RT-CON -30% of 1 repetition maximum (RM); RT-BFR -30% of 1RM and mild BFR (50% of arterial occlusion pressure); RT-HI -70% of 1 RM.
Improvements in handgrip strength were similar in RT-BFR (17%) and RT-HI (16%) vs. RT-CON (-0.1%), but increases in muscle mass (6% vs. 2% and -1%) and IGF-1 (2% vs. -0.1% and -1.5%) were greater (p < 0.05) in RT-BFR vs. RT-HI and RT-CON. Changes in vascular function, morphology, inflammation, and oxidative stress were similar between groups, except for time to reach maximum red blood cell velocity which showed a greater reduction (p < 0.05) in RT-BFR (-55%) vs. RT-HI (-11%) and RT-CON (-4%).
RT with low intensity and mild BFR improved muscle strength and mass in older individuals while preserving vascular function. This modality should be considered an adjuvant strategy to improve muscle function in older individuals with poor tolerance to high loads.
在老年人中,比较了低强度无血流限制(RT-CON)、低强度血流限制(RT-BFR)和高强度无血流限制(RT-HI)阻力训练后肌肉质量、力量、血管功能、氧化应激和炎症生物标志物的变化。
32 名未经训练的个体(72±7 岁)随机分为三组,进行 12 周的 RT:RT-CON - 1 重复最大强度(RM)的 30%;RT-BFR - 1RM 和轻度 BFR(动脉闭塞压的 50%)的 30%;RT-HI - 1 RM 的 70%。
与 RT-CON(0.1%)相比,RT-BFR(17%)和 RT-HI(16%)的握力增强相似,但肌肉质量(6%对 2%和-1%)和 IGF-1(2%对-0.1%和-1.5%)的增加在 RT-BFR 中更为明显(p<0.05) RT-HI 和 RT-CON。各组之间血管功能、形态、炎症和氧化应激的变化相似,但达到最大红细胞速度的时间除外,RT-BFR (-55%)与 RT-HI(-11%)和 RT-CON(-4%)相比,下降幅度更大(p<0.05)。
低强度和轻度 BFR 的 RT 可改善老年人的肌肉力量和质量,同时保持血管功能。对于对高负荷耐受差的老年人来说,这种方法应该被认为是改善肌肉功能的辅助策略。