MacAulay Margaret, Ybarra Michele, Saewyc Elizabeth, Sullivan Richard, Jackson Lauren, Millar Shannon
Stigma and Resilience Among Vulnerable Youth Centre (SARAVYC), School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Canada.
Center for Innovative Public Health Research, San Clemente, CA, USA.
Sex Educ. 2022;22(3):275-288. doi: 10.1080/14681811.2021.1924142. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
Scholarly conversations regarding sexual violence and sexuality education typically emphasise cisgender and heterosexual experiences, leaving sexual and gender minority young people's voices unheard. This happens despite adolescence being a crucial period for the onset of sexual violence, with sexual and gender minority youth reporting elevated levels of victimisation. Moreover, the preponderance of research focusing on victimisation suggests notable gaps in our understanding of sexual violence perpetration. This study examined contextual factors shaping sexual violence victimisation and perpetration among sexual and gender minority youth, with school playing a key role. Based on qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with 50 young people aged 14-26 years who self-reported sexual violence perpetration in the Growing Up with Media survey, the analysis demonstrates how schooling's 'hidden curriculum' leaves sexual and gender minority youth ill-equipped to navigate the world of sexuality. Formal sexuality education remains heteronormative and gender-segregated, resulting in incomplete understandings of sexual violence. At the informal level, gendered double standards and peer norms reinforce the second-class sexual citizenship of sexual and gender minority youth. Our findings suggest that schools may be complicit in sexual violence victimisation and perpetration by sending limited and mixed messages regarding gender and sexuality. Research and policy implications are discussed.
关于性暴力和性教育的学术讨论通常强调顺性别者和异性恋者的经历,使得性少数和性别少数青年的声音未被倾听。尽管青春期是性暴力开始的关键时期,性少数和性别少数青年报告的受害率较高,但这种情况仍在发生。此外,大量关注受害情况的研究表明,我们对性暴力实施情况的理解存在显著差距。本研究调查了影响性少数和性别少数青年性暴力受害和实施情况的背景因素,其中学校起着关键作用。基于对《与媒体一起成长》调查中50名14至26岁自我报告有性暴力行为的年轻人进行半结构化访谈的定性数据,分析表明学校教育的“隐性课程”如何使性少数和性别少数青年缺乏应对性世界的能力。正规的性教育仍然是异性恋规范且按性别隔离的,导致对性暴力的理解不完整。在非正规层面,性别双重标准和同伴规范强化了性少数和性别少数青年的二等性公民身份。我们的研究结果表明,学校可能通过传递关于性别和性取向的有限且相互矛盾的信息,在性暴力受害和实施中扮演了同谋角色。文中还讨论了研究和政策方面的影响。