Suppr超能文献

一种用于牙科扫描系统评估的新型参考模型:五种口腔内扫描仪的分析

A novel reference model for dental scanning system evaluation: analysis of five intraoral scanners.

作者信息

Karakas-Stupar Irina, Zitzmann Nicola Ursula, Joda Tim

机构信息

Department of Reconstructive Dentistry, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland.

Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry, University of Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Adv Prosthodont. 2022 Apr;14(2):63-69. doi: 10.4047/jap.2022.14.2.63. Epub 2022 Apr 27.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy (trueness and precision) of five intraoral scanners (IOS) using a novel reference model for standardized performance evaluation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five IOSs (Medit i500, Omnicam, Primescan, Trios 3, Trios 4) were used to digitize the reference model, which represented a simplified full-arch situation with four abutment teeth. Each IOS was used five times by an experienced operator, resulting in 25 STL (Standard Tessellation Language) files. STL data were imported into 3D software (Final Surface) and examined for inter- and intra-group analyses. Deviations in the parameter matching error were calculated. ANOVA F-test and Kruskal-Wallis test were applied for inter-group comparisons (α = .05); and the coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated for intra-group comparisons (in % ± SD).

RESULTS

Primescan (matching error value: 0.015), Trios 3 (0.016), and Trios 4 (0.018) revealed comparable results with significantly higher accuracy compared to Medit i500 (0.035) and Omnicam (0.028) ( < .001). For intra-group comparison, Trios 4 demonstrated the most homogenous results (CV 15.8%).

CONCLUSION

The novel reference model investigated in this study can be used to assess the performance of dental scanning technologies in the daily routine setting and in research settings.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在使用一种新型参考模型对五款口内扫描仪(IOS)进行标准化性能评估,以调查其准确性(真实性和精密度)。

材料与方法

使用五款IOS(Medit i500、Omnicam、Primescan、Trios 3、Trios 4)对参考模型进行数字化处理,该模型代表了一种带有四颗基牙的简化全牙弓情况。每位经验丰富的操作员对每款IOS使用五次,从而得到25个STL(标准镶嵌语言)文件。将STL数据导入3D软件(Final Surface),并进行组间和组内分析。计算参数匹配误差的偏差。应用方差分析F检验和克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验进行组间比较(α = 0.05);并计算组内比较的变异系数(CV)(以%±标准差表示)。

结果

Primescan(匹配误差值:0.015)、Trios 3(0.016)和Trios 4(0.018)的结果相当,与Medit i500(0.035)和Omnicam(0.028)相比,准确性显著更高(P < 0.001)。对于组内比较,Trios 4表现出最均匀的结果(CV为15.8%)。

结论

本研究中调查的新型参考模型可用于在日常临床环境和研究环境中评估牙科扫描技术的性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7290/9095454/b515e787405d/jap-14-63-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验