Karakas-Stupar Irina, Zitzmann Nicola Ursula, Joda Tim
Department of Reconstructive Dentistry, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland.
Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
J Adv Prosthodont. 2022 Apr;14(2):63-69. doi: 10.4047/jap.2022.14.2.63. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy (trueness and precision) of five intraoral scanners (IOS) using a novel reference model for standardized performance evaluation.
Five IOSs (Medit i500, Omnicam, Primescan, Trios 3, Trios 4) were used to digitize the reference model, which represented a simplified full-arch situation with four abutment teeth. Each IOS was used five times by an experienced operator, resulting in 25 STL (Standard Tessellation Language) files. STL data were imported into 3D software (Final Surface) and examined for inter- and intra-group analyses. Deviations in the parameter matching error were calculated. ANOVA F-test and Kruskal-Wallis test were applied for inter-group comparisons (α = .05); and the coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated for intra-group comparisons (in % ± SD).
Primescan (matching error value: 0.015), Trios 3 (0.016), and Trios 4 (0.018) revealed comparable results with significantly higher accuracy compared to Medit i500 (0.035) and Omnicam (0.028) ( < .001). For intra-group comparison, Trios 4 demonstrated the most homogenous results (CV 15.8%).
The novel reference model investigated in this study can be used to assess the performance of dental scanning technologies in the daily routine setting and in research settings.
本研究旨在使用一种新型参考模型对五款口内扫描仪(IOS)进行标准化性能评估,以调查其准确性(真实性和精密度)。
使用五款IOS(Medit i500、Omnicam、Primescan、Trios 3、Trios 4)对参考模型进行数字化处理,该模型代表了一种带有四颗基牙的简化全牙弓情况。每位经验丰富的操作员对每款IOS使用五次,从而得到25个STL(标准镶嵌语言)文件。将STL数据导入3D软件(Final Surface),并进行组间和组内分析。计算参数匹配误差的偏差。应用方差分析F检验和克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验进行组间比较(α = 0.05);并计算组内比较的变异系数(CV)(以%±标准差表示)。
Primescan(匹配误差值:0.015)、Trios 3(0.016)和Trios 4(0.018)的结果相当,与Medit i500(0.035)和Omnicam(0.028)相比,准确性显著更高(P < 0.001)。对于组内比较,Trios 4表现出最均匀的结果(CV为15.8%)。
本研究中调查的新型参考模型可用于在日常临床环境和研究环境中评估牙科扫描技术的性能。