Sadeghian Marzieh, Mohammadi Zahra, Mousavi Seyed Mahdi
Assistant Professor, Department of Occupational Health, Faculty of Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Science, Ahvaz, Iran.
PhD student, Department of Occupational Health and Safety, Student Research Committee, School of Public Health and safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
Cogn Neurodyn. 2022 Jun;16(3):561-574. doi: 10.1007/s11571-021-09737-3. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
Most studies have examined the effect of the physical aspects of noise while the effect of exposure to psychoacoustic parameters at different task difficulty levels has been less evaluated. Therefore, this study was performed with the aim of investigating the brainwave in the face of psychoacoustic and the change of difficulty level of task. 120 persons were exposed to 16 psychoacoustic parameters (loudness, sharpness, roughness and fluctuation strength). Each person was asked to complete the three N-Back task difficulty levels. At the same time, brain waves were recorded and the subject completed the NASA-TLX questionnaire. Finally, brain indices including alpha1, alpha2, PTeta, PAlpha and EI were examined. With increasing loudness, sharpness and fluctuation, the alpha-1 and alpha-2 index (mental fatigue (increased. Loudness and roughness also increased the PTeta and PAlpha (annoyance). For the EI (Engagement Index), increasing fluctuation caused a decrease in the level of consciousness and engagement. In addition, exposure to psychoacoustic parameters at high and medium difficulty levels caused a greater effect on alpha, alpha2, PrTeta and PrAlpha indices. High level of difficulty task reduce the accuracy rate and increase the reaction time to stimuli in the N-Back task, and increase the mean of dimensions of the NASA-TLX questionnaire in the exposure of all psychoacoustic aspect.With increasing loudness, sharpness and fluctuation, the alpha-1 and alpha-2 index (mental fatigue (increased. Loudness and roughness also increased the PTeta and PAlpha (annoyance). For the EI (Engagement Index), increasing fluctuation caused a decrease in the level of consciousness and engagement. In addition, exposure to psychoacoustic parameters at high and medium difficulty levels caused a greater effect on alpha, alpha2, PrTeta and PrAlpha indices. High level of difficulty task reduce the accuracy rate and increase the reaction time to stimuli in the N-Back task, and increase the mean of dimensions of the NASA-TLX questionnaire in the exposure of all psychoacoustic aspect. Considering the effect of psychoacoustic at different levels of task difficulty on the mental load and cognitive function is essential to prevent damage to the person and his performance.
大多数研究考察了噪声物理方面的影响,而在不同任务难度水平下暴露于心理声学参数的影响则较少得到评估。因此,本研究旨在调查面对心理声学因素时的脑电波以及任务难度水平的变化。120人暴露于16种心理声学参数(响度、尖锐度、粗糙度和波动强度)。要求每个人完成三个N-回溯任务难度水平。同时,记录脑电波,受试者完成NASA-TLX问卷。最后,检查包括α1、α2、PTeta、PAlpha和EI在内的脑指标。随着响度、尖锐度和波动的增加,α-1和α-2指标(精神疲劳)增加。响度和粗糙度也增加了PTeta和PAlpha(烦恼)。对于EI(参与指数),波动增加导致意识和参与水平下降。此外,在高难度和中等难度水平下暴露于心理声学参数对α、α2、PrTeta和PrAlpha指标有更大影响。高难度任务会降低N-回溯任务中对刺激的准确率并增加反应时间,并且在所有心理声学方面的暴露中会增加NASA-TLX问卷各维度的平均值。考虑心理声学在不同任务难度水平对心理负荷和认知功能的影响对于防止对人及其表现造成损害至关重要。随着响度、尖锐度和波动的增加,α-1和α-2指标(精神疲劳)增加。响度和粗糙度也增加了PTeta和PAlpha(烦恼)。对于EI(参与指数),波动增加导致意识和参与水平下降。此外,在高难度和中等难度水平下暴露于心理声学参数对α、α2、PrTeta和PrAlpha指标有更大影响。高难度任务会降低N-回溯任务中对刺激的准确率并增加反应时间,并且在所有心理声学方面的暴露中会增加NASA-TLX问卷各维度的平均值。