• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中学生计算思维倾向测量中的性别差异项目功能分析

Gender differential item functioning analysis in measuring computational thinking disposition among secondary school students.

作者信息

Sovey Saralah, Osman Kamisah, Matore Mohd Effendi Ewan Mohd

机构信息

Sungai Ramal Secondary School, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.

Faculty of Education, Centre of STEM Enculturation, National University of Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 24;13:1022304. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1022304. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1022304
PMID:36506434
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9729778/
Abstract

Computational thinking refers to the cognitive processes underpinning the application of computer science concepts and methodologies to the methodical approach and creation of a solution to a problem. The study aims to determine how students' cognitive, affective, and conative dispositions in using computational thinking are influenced by a gender. This study used a survey research design with quantitative approach. Five hundred thirty-five secondary school students were sampled using probability sampling with the Computational Thinking Disposition Instrument (CTDI). WINSTEPS version 3.71.0 software was subsequently employed to assess the Gender Differential item functioning (GDIF) including reliability and validity with descriptive statistics were employed to assess students' disposition toward practicing computational thinking. In addition to providing implications for the theory, the data give verifiable research that the CT disposition profile consists of three constructs. In addition, the demonstrated CTDI has good GDIF features, which may be employed to evaluate the efficacy of the application of CT in the Malaysian curriculum by measuring the level of CT in terms of the disposition profile of students.

摘要

计算思维是指支撑将计算机科学概念和方法应用于有条理地解决问题的方法和创造解决方案的认知过程。该研究旨在确定学生在运用计算思维时的认知、情感和意动倾向如何受到性别的影响。本研究采用定量方法的调查研究设计。使用计算思维倾向量表(CTDI),通过概率抽样对535名中学生进行了抽样。随后使用WINSTEPS 3.71.0版软件评估性别差异项目功能(GDIF),包括信度和效度,并使用描述性统计来评估学生对实践计算思维的倾向。除了为理论提供启示外,数据还提供了可验证的研究,即计算思维倾向概况由三个结构组成。此外,所展示的CTDI具有良好的GDIF特征,可通过根据学生的倾向概况测量计算思维水平,用于评估计算思维在马来西亚课程中的应用效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5f1/9729778/8a5343e1c169/fpsyt-13-1022304-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5f1/9729778/c365da96eda2/fpsyt-13-1022304-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5f1/9729778/0465d842e48e/fpsyt-13-1022304-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5f1/9729778/8a5343e1c169/fpsyt-13-1022304-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5f1/9729778/c365da96eda2/fpsyt-13-1022304-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5f1/9729778/0465d842e48e/fpsyt-13-1022304-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5f1/9729778/8a5343e1c169/fpsyt-13-1022304-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Gender differential item functioning analysis in measuring computational thinking disposition among secondary school students.中学生计算思维倾向测量中的性别差异项目功能分析
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 24;13:1022304. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1022304. eCollection 2022.
2
Development and validation of the critical thinking disposition inventory for Chinese medical college students (CTDI-M).发展和验证中国医学生批判性思维倾向量表(CTDI-M)。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jun 13;19(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1593-z.
3
Chinese medical students' disposition for critical thinking: a mixed methods exploration.中国医学生的批判性思维倾向:混合方法探索。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jul 16;21(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02801-w.
4
Influence of critical thinking disposition on the learning efficiency of problem-based learning in undergraduate medical students.批判性思维倾向对本科医学生基于问题学习的学习效率的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jan 3;19(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1418-5.
5
Critical thinking disposition of nursing students: A quantitative investigation.护理专业学生的批判性思维倾向:一项定量研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2021 Aug;55:103167. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103167. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
6
Insight from the association between critical thinking and English argumentative writing: catering to English learners' writing ability.从批判性思维与英语议论文写作的关系中得到的启示:满足英语学习者的写作能力。
PeerJ. 2023 Nov 20;11:e16435. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16435. eCollection 2023.
7
University students' cognitive flexibility and critical thinking dispositions.大学生的认知灵活性与批判性思维倾向。
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 9;15:1420272. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1420272. eCollection 2024.
8
A multigroup structural equation modeling analysis of students' perception, motivation, and performance in computational thinking.关于学生在计算思维方面的认知、动机和表现的多组结构方程模型分析。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 7;13:989066. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.989066. eCollection 2022.
9
Experimental study of teaching critical thinking in civic education in Taiwanese junior high school.台湾初中公民教育中批判性思维教学的实验研究
Br J Educ Psychol. 2009 Mar;79(Pt 1):29-55. doi: 10.1348/000709907X238771. Epub 2007 Sep 5.
10
The effect of gender role orientation on student nurses' caring behaviour and critical thinking.性别角色取向对护生关爱行为和批判性思维的影响。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Jan;89:18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Sep 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigation of electroencephalography variations of mental workload in the exposure of the psychoacoustic in both male and female groups.男性和女性群体在心理声学暴露中精神负荷的脑电图变化研究。
Cogn Neurodyn. 2022 Jun;16(3):561-574. doi: 10.1007/s11571-021-09737-3. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
2
Setting the space for deliberation in decision-making.在决策过程中为审议留出空间。
Cogn Neurodyn. 2021 Oct;15(5):743-755. doi: 10.1007/s11571-021-09681-2. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
3
Investigating the effect of age and gender of users on improving spirituality by using EEG.
通过脑电图研究用户的年龄和性别对提升精神性的影响。
Cogn Neurodyn. 2021 Aug;15(4):637-647. doi: 10.1007/s11571-020-09654-x. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
4
Switch or stay? Automatic classification of internal mental states in bistable perception.切换还是保持?双稳态感知中内部心理状态的自动分类。
Cogn Neurodyn. 2020 Feb;14(1):95-113. doi: 10.1007/s11571-019-09548-7. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
5
Rasch Analysis for Instrument Development: Why, When, and How?用于工具开发的拉施分析:为何、何时以及如何进行?
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Winter;15(4). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-04-0148.
6
Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?为什么有些 STEM 领域比其他领域的性别更均衡?
Psychol Bull. 2017 Jan;143(1):1-35. doi: 10.1037/bul0000052. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
7
Sampling in epidemiological research: issues, hazards and pitfalls.流行病学研究中的抽样:问题、风险与陷阱。
BJPsych Bull. 2016 Apr;40(2):57-60. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.114.050203.
8
Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments: language, setting, time and statistical considerations.研究工具的跨文化调适:语言、情境、时间和统计考量。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Feb 10;10:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-13.
9
Computational thinking and thinking about computing.计算思维与对计算的思考。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2008 Oct 28;366(1881):3717-25. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0118.
10
[Operationalizing the cross-cultural adaptation of epidemiological measurement instruments].[实现流行病学测量工具的跨文化适应]
Rev Saude Publica. 2007 Aug;41(4):665-73. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102006005000035.