Center for Animal Resources and Education, Cornell University, USA.
Lab Anim. 2022 Oct;56(5):482-489. doi: 10.1177/00236772221090801. Epub 2022 May 22.
Consideration of The Three R's (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement) is essential when setting Humane Endpoints; however, a common interpretation assumes that Humane Endpoints are timepoints to perform euthanasia. This interpretation is not always consistent with the three Rs. There are many available intervention options that - when used to respond to pain, discomfort, or distress - facilitate application of the three Rs while achieving experimental goals. At our institution, the term 'Humane Endpoints' was replaced with 'Humane Intervention Points', to ensure responses beyond euthanasia are given priority by laboratory animal professionals and researchers. Identification of Humane Intervention Points in the research protocol provides us with a more accurate reflection of the measures used to alleviate pain and distress in animals used for research, testing, and teaching - an outcome easily envisioned elsewhere.Points d'intervention humains (PIH): Affinage de la terminologie d'évaluation finale pour intégrer des options d'intervention sans recours à l'euthanasie afin d'améliorer le bien-être des animaux et de préserver les résultats expérimentaux Résumé.
在确定人道终点时,必须考虑到“三 R”原则(替代、减少和优化);然而,一种常见的解释认为人道终点是实施安乐死的时间点。这种解释并不总是符合三 R 原则。有许多可用的干预选项——当用于应对疼痛、不适或痛苦时——有助于在实现实验目标的同时应用三 R 原则。在我们的机构中,“人道终点”一词被替换为“人道干预点”,以确保实验室动物专业人员和研究人员优先考虑除安乐死以外的反应。在研究方案中确定人道干预点,使我们更准确地反映用于减轻用于研究、测试和教学的动物的疼痛和痛苦的措施,这一结果在其他地方也很容易想象。
干预点(PIH):调整最终评估术语,以纳入无需实施安乐死的干预选项,从而改善动物的福利并保留实验结果。
摘要。