School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1400 Main St. W. Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, L8S 1C7, Canada.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 May 23;23(1):488. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05391-w.
Low back pain has been associated with obesity or with being overweight. However, there are no high-quality systematic reviews that have been conducted on the effect of all types of weight loss programs focused on individuals with low back pain. Therefore, the present systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of weight loss programs in reducing back pain and disability or increasing quality of life for individuals experiencing low back pain.
Searches for relevant studies were conducted on CINAHL, Web of Science, Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase and AMED. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials, non-randomized studies of intervention or quasi-experimental designs evaluating a weight loss program for persons with low back pain aimed at decreasing back pain and disability. The Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) Quality Assessment Tool was used to evaluate individual studies and GRADE was used to summarize the quality of the evidence. The review was prospectively registered; PROSPERO#: CRD42020196099.
Eleven studies (n = 689 participants) including one randomized controlled trial, two non-randomized studies of intervention and eight single-arm studies were included (seven of which evaluated bariatric surgery). There was low-quality evidence that a lifestyle intervention was no better than waitlist for improving back pain and very low-quality evidence from single-arm studies that back pain improved from baseline after bariatric surgery. Most studies included were of poor quality, primarily due to selection bias, uncontrolled confounders, and lack of blinding, limiting the quality of evidence.
There is very low-quality evidence that weight loss programs may improve back pain, disability, and quality of life in patients with LBP, although adherence and maintenance are potential barriers to implementation.
腰痛与肥胖或超重有关。然而,目前尚无针对针对腰痛患者的各种减肥计划效果的高质量系统评价。因此,本系统评价旨在评估减肥计划在减轻腰痛和残疾或提高腰痛患者生活质量方面的有效性。
在 CINAHL、Web of Science、Ovid Medline、Ovid Embase 和 AMED 上进行了相关研究的检索。如果是针对腰痛患者的减肥计划的随机对照试验、干预性非随机研究或准实验设计的研究,旨在减轻腰痛和残疾,则纳入研究。使用有效公共卫生实践项目(EPHPP)质量评估工具来评估个体研究,使用 GRADE 来总结证据质量。该综述是前瞻性注册的;PROSPERO#: CRD42020196099。
共纳入 11 项研究(n=689 名参与者),包括 1 项随机对照试验、2 项干预性非随机研究和 8 项单臂研究(其中 7 项评估了减重手术)。生活方式干预与等待相比,改善腰痛的证据质量为低,而来自单臂研究的证据质量非常低,表明减重手术后腰痛从基线改善。大多数纳入的研究质量较差,主要是由于选择偏倚、未控制的混杂因素和缺乏盲法,限制了证据质量。
减肥计划可能会改善腰痛、残疾和生活质量,但患者的依从性和维持是实施的潜在障碍。