• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

兰森评分联合体重指数在预测重症急性胰腺炎死亡率中的价值:一项回顾性研究

The Value of RANSON Score Combined with BMI in Predicting the Mortality in Severe Acute Pancreatitis: A Retrospective Study.

作者信息

Yin Xu, Zhong Xiang, Li Jun, Le Ma, Shan Shiting, Zhu Chunfu

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital Affiliated with Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, 213000, People's Republic of China.

Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, 226000, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Int J Gen Med. 2022 May 17;15:5015-5025. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S356626. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.2147/IJGM.S356626
PMID:35607358
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9124060/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the value of modified RANSON score in predicting mortality from severe acute pancreatitis (SAP).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 461 SAP patients hospitalized from January 2016 to January 2020 were enrolled. AP (acute pancreatitis) patients from our hospital were employed as the training set. In addition, AP patients from the affiliated hospital of Nantong University were set as the validation set. The clinical characteristics of patients were compared between the two sets. The independent risk factors for SAP were determined through logistic regression. Moreover, the risk factors were derived for various prediction models by logistic regression. Multiple methods were adopted to assess the predictive ability of various models.

RESULTS

A total of 338 patients were assigned into the training set, while 123 patients were assigned into the validation set. The patients in the training and validation sets showed the consistent distribution trends (P>0.05). In the training set, significant differences between patients in the non-survival and survival groups were BMI, PCT, platelets (PLT), direct bilirubin (DBil) and RANSON scores (P<0.05). In further multivariate analysis, BMI, PCT and RANSON score were found as the independent risk factors for the mortality of SAP (OR=1.12, 1.25, 1.28, 95% CI:1.06-1.19, 1.08-1.44, 1.12-1.47, P<0.05). In the training set and validation set, ROC curve analysis showed that AUC of BMI+RANSON score was 0.778 and 0.789, respectively. In the calibration curve, the fitting degree of RANSON score+BMI and ideal assessment model was 0.975 and 0.854, respectively. The decision curve suggested that the net benefit per patient increased with the lengthening of the RANSON score+ BMI model curve. As revealed by the results of NRI and IDI indicators, RANSON score+BMI was optimized based on RANSON score (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

BMI+RANSON was confirmed as a modified model effective in predicting the mortality from SAP.

摘要

目的

探讨改良Ranson评分在预测重症急性胰腺炎(SAP)死亡率中的价值。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,纳入了2016年1月至2020年1月期间住院的461例SAP患者。将我院的急性胰腺炎(AP)患者作为训练集。此外,将南通大学附属医院的AP患者作为验证集。比较两组患者的临床特征。通过逻辑回归确定SAP的独立危险因素。此外,通过逻辑回归得出各种预测模型的危险因素。采用多种方法评估各种模型的预测能力。

结果

共338例患者被纳入训练集,123例患者被纳入验证集。训练集和验证集患者的分布趋势一致(P>0.05)。在训练集中,非生存组和生存组患者的BMI、降钙素原(PCT)、血小板(PLT)、直接胆红素(DBil)和Ranson评分存在显著差异(P<0.05)。进一步的多因素分析发现,BMI、PCT和Ranson评分是SAP死亡率的独立危险因素(OR=1.12、1.25、1.28,95%CI:1.06-1.19、1.08-1.44、1.12-1.47,P<0.05)。在训练集和验证集中,ROC曲线分析显示BMI+Ranson评分的AUC分别为0.778和0.789。在校准曲线中,Ranson评分+BMI与理想评估模型的拟合度分别为0.975和0.854。决策曲线表明,随着Ranson评分+BMI模型曲线的延长,每位患者的净效益增加。NRI和IDI指标结果显示,Ranson评分+BMI在Ranson评分的基础上得到了优化(P<0.05)。

结论

BMI+Ranson被确认为一种有效预测SAP死亡率的改良模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a4c/9124060/6c7a6fa3b990/IJGM-15-5015-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a4c/9124060/bcaf89d4b8a5/IJGM-15-5015-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a4c/9124060/90794b7ab039/IJGM-15-5015-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a4c/9124060/6c7a6fa3b990/IJGM-15-5015-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a4c/9124060/bcaf89d4b8a5/IJGM-15-5015-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a4c/9124060/90794b7ab039/IJGM-15-5015-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a4c/9124060/6c7a6fa3b990/IJGM-15-5015-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Value of RANSON Score Combined with BMI in Predicting the Mortality in Severe Acute Pancreatitis: A Retrospective Study.兰森评分联合体重指数在预测重症急性胰腺炎死亡率中的价值:一项回顾性研究
Int J Gen Med. 2022 May 17;15:5015-5025. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S356626. eCollection 2022.
2
[Application of machine learning model based on XGBoost algorithm in early prediction of patients with acute severe pancreatitis].基于XGBoost算法的机器学习模型在急性重症胰腺炎患者早期预测中的应用
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2023 Apr;35(4):421-426. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20221019-00930.
3
Comparison of Different Scoring Systems in Predicting the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis: A Prospective Observational Study.不同评分系统在预测急性胰腺炎严重程度中的比较:一项前瞻性观察研究
Cureus. 2020 Feb 10;12(2):e6943. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6943.
4
Validation of the modified Ranson versus Glasgow score for pancreatitis in a Singaporean population.改良兰森评分与格拉斯哥评分在新加坡人群中对胰腺炎的验证。
ANZ J Surg. 2017 Sep;87(9):700-703. doi: 10.1111/ans.13139. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
5
Predicting fatal outcome in the early phase of severe acute pancreatitis by using novel prognostic models.使用新型预后模型预测重症急性胰腺炎早期的致命结局。
Pancreatology. 2003;3(4):309-15. doi: 10.1159/000071769.
6
Severity scoring for prognostication in patients with severe acute pancreatitis: comparative analysis of the Ranson score and the APACHE III score.重症急性胰腺炎患者预后的严重程度评分:兰森评分与急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅲ(APACHE III)评分的比较分析
Arch Surg. 2002 Jun;137(6):730-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.6.730.
7
[Value of four scoring systems for predicting prognosis of severe acute pancreatitis].[四种评分系统对预测重症急性胰腺炎预后的价值]
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao. 2009 Jan;7(1):34-40. doi: 10.3736/jcim20090105.
8
Comparison of the BISAP scores for predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis in Chinese patients according to the latest Atlanta classification.根据最新亚特兰大分类法比较BISAP评分对中国急性胰腺炎患者严重程度的预测价值
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014 Sep;21(9):689-694. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.118. Epub 2014 May 22.
9
Analysis of factors influencing survival in patients with severe acute pancreatitis.影响重症急性胰腺炎患者生存的因素分析
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2017 Aug;52(8):904-908. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2017.1310291. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
10
Predictive value of the ratio of venoarterial PCO2 to arteriovenous O2 content difference for organ injury in patients with severe acute pancreatitis.动静脉血 PCO2 比值与动静脉血氧含量差对重症急性胰腺炎患者器官损伤的预测价值。
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Oct;10(10):10706-10711. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-2557.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting the Severity of the First Episode of Hyperlipidemic Acute Pancreatitis.预测高脂血症性急性胰腺炎首发严重程度列线图的构建与验证
J Inflamm Res. 2024 May 20;17:3211-3223. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S459258. eCollection 2024.
2
Expression levels of and in peripheral blood of severe acute pancreatitis and their clinical significance.重症急性胰腺炎患者外周血中[具体物质]的表达水平及其临床意义。 (你原文中“and”前后应该有具体物质未给出,这里按常规补充了[具体物质])
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2023 Feb;104(2):90-100. doi: 10.4174/astr.2023.104.2.90. Epub 2023 Jan 31.

本文引用的文献

1
The course of acute pancreatitis in patients with different BMI groups.不同体重指数(BMI)组患者的急性胰腺炎病程。
Pancreatology. 2022 Apr;22(3):348-355. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2022.03.009. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
2
[A prospective cohort study on BMI levels and risk of acute pancreatitis].一项关于体重指数水平与急性胰腺炎风险的前瞻性队列研究
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Dec 10;42(12):2131-2137. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20201027-01286.
3
Hypertriglyceridemia-associated acute pancreatitis: Response to continuous insulin infusion.
高甘油三酯血症相关性急性胰腺炎:持续胰岛素输注的反应。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 30;16(11):e0260495. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260495. eCollection 2021.
4
C-Reactive Protein and Cancer: Interpreting the Differential Bioactivities of Its Pentameric and Monomeric, Modified Isoforms.C 反应蛋白与癌症:解读其五聚体和单体、修饰亚型的差异生物活性。
Front Immunol. 2021 Sep 6;12:744129. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.744129. eCollection 2021.
5
The Role of C-Reactive Protein in Kidney, Bladder, and Prostate Cancers.C反应蛋白在肾癌、膀胱癌和前列腺癌中的作用。
Front Immunol. 2021 Aug 27;12:721989. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.721989. eCollection 2021.
6
Screening for Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.筛查糖尿病前期和 2 型糖尿病:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2021 Aug 24;326(8):736-743. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.12531.
7
Bedside index (BISAP) v/s Ranson scores in predicting mortality and severity in patients with acute pancreatitis.床边指数(BISAP)与 Ranson 评分在预测急性胰腺炎患者死亡率和严重程度中的比较。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 Aug;71(8):1988-1991. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.03-417.
8
C-reactive protein predicts the development of walled-off necrosis in patients with severe acute pancreatitis.C反应蛋白可预测重症急性胰腺炎患者包裹性坏死的发生。
JGH Open. 2021 Jun 29;5(8):907-914. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12605. eCollection 2021 Aug.
9
Ranson score to stratify severity in Acute Pancreatitis remains valid - Old is gold.Ranson 评分对急性胰腺炎严重程度的分层仍然有效——老方法也有价值。
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Aug;15(8):865-877. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2021.1924058. Epub 2021 May 13.
10
Acute Pancreatitis.急性胰腺炎。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Feb;174(2):ITC17-ITC32. doi: 10.7326/AITC202102160. Epub 2021 Feb 9.