Department of Oncology Services, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Medical Physics and Bioengineering, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.
J Med Radiat Sci. 2022 Dec;69(4):502-509. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.597. Epub 2022 May 23.
INTRODUCTION: Deep inspiratory breath-hold (DIBH) has become standard in radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer to reduce the heart dose. This study evaluated breath-hold stability and reproducibility using Elekta's Active Breathing Coordinator™ (ABC) and its effectiveness and feasibility in left-sided breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. METHODS: Eligible patients were planned with free breathing (FB) and DIBH protocols. DIBH treatment was considered if the mean heart dose (MHD) was ≥2 Gy on the FB plan. Those who proceeded with DIBH treatment were enrolled for the pilot study. Electronic portal images of DIBH treatment beams were taken using the movie-exposure mode for breath-hold stability and reproducibility analysis. DIBH effectiveness in heart dose reduction and impact on simulation and treatment durations were compared with FB protocol. RESULTS: Out of 56 eligible patients, 15 proceeded with DIBH treatment. The mean difference of patient setup within a single breath-hold was 0.4 mm; between different breath-holds of the same beam 1.1 mm and between different days 2.6 mm. DIBH reduced the MHD by 47% and the mean left anterior descending artery (LAD) dose by 35%. DIBH took longer time than FB in simulation and treatment. At least 14% of the eligible patients did not tolerate DIBH during simulation. CONCLUSIONS: ABC leads to stable and reproducible breath-holds and results in significant heart dose reductions. It may not be tolerated by all patients and has resource implications.
简介:深吸气屏气(DIBH)已成为左侧乳腺癌放疗的标准方法,以降低心脏剂量。本研究使用 Elekta 的主动呼吸控制器(ABC)评估屏气的稳定性和可重复性,并评估其在接受放疗的左侧乳腺癌患者中的有效性和可行性。
方法:符合条件的患者分别进行自由呼吸(FB)和 DIBH 计划。如果 FB 计划中的平均心脏剂量(MHD)≥2Gy,则考虑进行 DIBH 治疗。如果选择 DIBH 治疗,则纳入该研究的试点阶段。使用电影曝光模式拍摄 DIBH 治疗射束的电子端口图像,用于分析屏气的稳定性和可重复性。比较 DIBH 在降低心脏剂量方面的有效性以及对模拟和治疗时间的影响与 FB 方案。
结果:在 56 名符合条件的患者中,有 15 名患者接受了 DIBH 治疗。单次屏气期间患者摆位的平均差异为 0.4mm;同一射束的不同屏气之间为 1.1mm,不同天之间为 2.6mm。DIBH 使 MHD 降低了 47%,使左前降支(LAD)的平均剂量降低了 35%。DIBH 比 FB 在模拟和治疗过程中花费的时间更长。在模拟过程中,至少有 14%的符合条件的患者不能耐受 DIBH。
结论:ABC 可实现稳定且可重复的屏气,并显著降低心脏剂量。但并非所有患者都能耐受 DIBH,且可能需要更多资源。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2022-9
Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2025-5-24
Strahlenther Onkol. 2018-10-11
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017-5-21
Radiother Oncol. 2017-3
Radiother Oncol. 2017-1
J Med Radiat Sci. 2015-3