Suppr超能文献

在屏气腹部立体定向放射治疗期间,将表面引导与基于超声的监测以及锥束计算机断层扫描中的膈肌位置进行比较。

Surface guidance compared with ultrasound-based monitoring and diaphragm position in cone-beam computed tomography during abdominal stereotactic radiotherapy in breath-hold.

作者信息

Kaestner Lena, Streb Lara, Hetjens Svetlana, Buergy Daniel, Sihono Dwi S K, Fleckenstein Jens, Kalisch Iris, Eckl Miriam, Giordano Frank A, Lohr Frank, Stieler Florian, Boda-Heggemann Judit

机构信息

University Medical Center Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.

University Medical Center Mannheim, Department of Medical Statistics and Biomathematics, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2023 Jun 5;27:100455. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100455. eCollection 2023 Jul.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Spirometry induced deep-inspiration-breath-hold (DIBH) reduces intrafractional motion during upper abdominal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate whether surface scanning (SGRT) is an adequate surrogate for monitoring residual internal motion during DIBH. Residual motion detected by SGRT was compared with experimental 4D-ultrasound (US) and an internal motion detection benchmark (diaphragm-dome-position in kV cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) projections).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Intrafractional monitoring was performed with SGRT and US in 460 DIBHs of 12 patients. Residual motion detected by all modalities (SGRT (anterior-posterior (AP)), US (AP, craniocaudal (CC)) and CBCT (CC)) was analyzed. Agreement analysis included Wilcoxon signed rank test, Maloney and Rastogi's test, Pearson's correlation coefficient (PCC) and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

Interquartile range was 0.7 mm (US(AP)), 0.8 mm (US(CC)), 0.9 mm (SGRT) and 0.8 mm (CBCT). SGRT(AP) vs. CBCT(CC) and US(CC) vs. CBCT(CC) showed comparable agreement (PCCs 0.53 and 0.52, ICCs 0.51 and 0.49) with slightly higher precision of CBCT(CC). Most agreement was observed for SGRT(AP) vs. US(AP) with largest PCC (0.61) and ICC (0.60), least agreement for SGRT(AP) vs. US(CC) with smallest PCC (0.44) and ICC (0.42).

CONCLUSIONS

Residual motion detected during spirometry induced DIBH is small. SGRT alone is no sufficient surrogate for residual internal motion in all patients as some high velocity motion could not be detected. Observed patient-specific residual errors may require individualized PTV-margins.

摘要

背景与目的

肺活量测定诱导的深吸气屏气(DIBH)可减少上腹部立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)期间的分次内运动。本前瞻性研究的目的是评估表面扫描(SGRT)是否是监测DIBH期间残余内部运动的合适替代方法。将SGRT检测到的残余运动与实验性4D超声(US)和内部运动检测基准(千伏锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)投影中的膈肌穹窿位置)进行比较。

材料与方法

对12例患者的460次DIBH进行了SGRT和US的分次内监测。分析了所有模态(SGRT(前后(AP))、US(AP、头脚(CC))和CBCT(CC))检测到的残余运动。一致性分析包括Wilcoxon符号秩检验、Maloney和Rastogi检验、Pearson相关系数(PCC)和组内相关系数(ICC)。

结果

四分位间距分别为0.7毫米(US(AP))、0.8毫米(US(CC))、0.9毫米(SGRT)和0.8毫米(CBCT)。SGRT(AP)与CBCT(CC)以及US(CC)与CBCT(CC)显示出相当的一致性(PCC分别为0.53和0.52,ICC分别为0.51和0.49),CBCT(CC)的精度略高。SGRT(AP)与US(AP)的一致性最高,PCC最大(0.61),ICC最大(0.60);SGRT(AP)与US(CC)的一致性最低,PCC最小(0.44),ICC最小(0.42)。

结论

肺活量测定诱导的DIBH期间检测到的残余运动较小。仅SGRT不足以作为所有患者残余内部运动的替代方法,因为一些高速运动无法检测到。观察到的患者特异性残余误差可能需要个体化的计划靶体积(PTV)边界。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dade/10500027/22f2919a9d97/ga1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验