Ernst Sophie-Christin Kornelia, Steinbeck Viktoria, Busse Reinhard, Pross Christoph
Faculty of Economics and Management, Department of Health Care Management, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Faculty of Economics and Management, Department of Health Care Management, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Value Health. 2022 Sep;25(9):1539-1547. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.04.1724. Epub 2022 May 21.
This study aimed to develop a framework facilitating (1) the maturity assessment of healthcare systems regarding patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) implementation and (2) the comparison of different healthcare systems' PROM implementation levels to guide discussions and derive lessons for regional, state-level, and national PROM initiatives.
Guided by the grounded theory methodology, a PROM healthcare system implementation framework was developed following multiple steps. Based on interviews with 28 experts from 12 countries and a literature review, a framework was drafted and refined through 29 additional validation interviews.
The resulting framework comprises 5 implementation stages along 7 dimensions. Implementation stages range from "first experimentation" to "system-wide adoption and a vibrant ecosystem." The dimensions are grouped into patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurement and PRO utilization, the former with the dimensions "scope and condition coverage," "metric and process standardization," and "tools and information technology-based solutions" and the latter with "patient empowerment and clinical decision support," "reporting and quality improvement," and "rewarding and contracting." The "culture and stakeholder involvement" dimension connects both groups. Although a concerted implementation approach across dimensions can be observed in advanced countries, others show a more uneven adoption.
The framework and its preliminary application to different healthcare systems demonstrate (1) the importance of coherent progress across complementing dimensions and (2) the relevance of PROM integration across clinical specialties and care sectors to strengthen patient-centered care. Overall, the framework can facilitate dialogues between stakeholders to analyze the current PROM implementation status and strategies to advance it.
本研究旨在建立一个框架,以促进(1)对医疗保健系统在患者报告结局测量(PROM)实施方面的成熟度评估,以及(2)比较不同医疗保健系统的PROM实施水平,为地区、州级和国家级的PROM计划提供讨论指导并吸取经验教训。
在扎根理论方法的指导下,通过多个步骤建立了一个PROM医疗保健系统实施框架。基于对来自12个国家的28位专家的访谈以及文献综述,起草了一个框架,并通过另外29次验证访谈对其进行了完善。
最终形成的框架包括沿7个维度的5个实施阶段。实施阶段从“首次试验”到“全系统采用和充满活力的生态系统”。这些维度分为患者报告结局(PRO)测量和PRO利用,前者包括“范围和条件覆盖”、“指标和流程标准化”以及“工具和基于信息技术的解决方案”等维度,后者包括“患者赋权和临床决策支持”、“报告和质量改进”以及“奖励和签约”等维度。“文化和利益相关者参与”维度将这两组联系起来。尽管在发达国家可以观察到各维度之间协调一致的实施方法,但其他国家的采用情况则更为不均衡。
该框架及其在不同医疗保健系统中的初步应用表明,(1)在互补维度上协调进展的重要性,以及(2)跨临床专科和护理部门整合PROM以加强以患者为中心的护理的相关性。总体而言,该框架可以促进利益相关者之间的对话,以分析当前PROM的实施状况以及推进其发展的策略。