• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Toward More Inclusive Networks and Initiatives in Innovation Ecosystems: Protocol for a Systematic Review.迈向创新生态系统中更具包容性的网络与举措:一项系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 May 25;11(5):e34071. doi: 10.2196/34071.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Strategies for involving patients and the public in scaling-up initiatives in health and social services: protocol for a scoping review and Delphi survey.参与健康和社会服务扩大计划的患者和公众的策略:范围综述和德尔菲调查的方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 11;10(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01597-6.
5
Initiatives, Concepts, and Implementation Practices of FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) Data Principles in Health Data Stewardship Practice: Protocol for a Scoping Review.健康数据管理实践中FAIR(可查找、可访问、可互操作和可重用)数据原则的倡议、概念及实施实践:一项范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Feb 2;10(2):e22505. doi: 10.2196/22505.
6
Adoption of a novel surgical innovation into clinical practice: protocol for a qualitative systematic review examining surgeon views.将一项新型外科创新应用于临床实践:一项定性系统评价的方案,该评价旨在考察外科医生的观点。
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 17;8(4):e020486. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020486.
7
Examining Challenges to the Incorporation of End Users in the Design of Digital Health Interventions: Protocol for a Systematic Review.审视数字健康干预设计中纳入终端用户所面临的挑战:一项系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jul 26;10(7):e28083. doi: 10.2196/28083.
8
Healthcare stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis.医疗保健利益相关者对影响重症监护远程医疗(CCT)实施因素的看法和经验:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 18;2(2):CD012876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012876.pub2.
9
The Provision of Texture-Modified Foods in Long-term Care Facilities by Health Professionals: Protocol for a Scoping Review.健康专业人员在长期护理机构中提供质地改良食品:一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Mar 17;12:e44201. doi: 10.2196/44201.
10
Digital Education for the Management of Chronic Wounds in Health Care Professionals: Protocol for a Systematic Review by the Digital Health Education Collaboration.医疗保健专业人员慢性伤口管理的数字教育:数字健康教育合作组织的系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Mar 25;8(3):e12488. doi: 10.2196/12488.

本文引用的文献

1
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
2
Recommendations for the conduct of systematic reviews in toxicology and environmental health research (COSTER).毒理学和环境卫生研究系统评价实施指南(COSTER)。
Environ Int. 2020 Oct;143:105926. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105926. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
3
A systematic review of distal revascularization and interval ligation for the treatment of vascular access-induced ischemia.远端血运重建和间隔结扎治疗血管通路相关性缺血的系统评价。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Oct;70(4):1364-1373. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.02.060. Epub 2019 May 29.
4
Exposure to neuroactive non-organochlorine insecticides, and diabetes mellitus and related metabolic disturbances: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.暴露于神经活性非有机氯杀虫剂与糖尿病及其相关代谢紊乱:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
Environ Int. 2019 Jun;127:664-670. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.02.074. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
5
Formulating questions to explore complex interventions within qualitative evidence synthesis.在定性证据综合中提出问题以探索复杂干预措施。
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jan 25;4(Suppl 1):e001107. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001107. eCollection 2019.
6
Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.Rayyan——一款用于系统评价的网络和移动应用程序。
Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.
7
Practical tips for surgical research: Research questions, hypotheses and objectives.外科研究实用技巧:研究问题、假设与目标。
Can J Surg. 2010 Aug;53(4):278-81.
8
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.用于报告评估卫生保健干预措施的研究的系统评价和荟萃分析的PRISMA声明:解释与详述
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):e1-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
9
Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem.使你的创新战略与创新生态系统相匹配。
Harv Bus Rev. 2006 Apr;84(4):98-107; 148.

迈向创新生态系统中更具包容性的网络与举措:一项系统评价方案

Toward More Inclusive Networks and Initiatives in Innovation Ecosystems: Protocol for a Systematic Review.

作者信息

Ntina Georgia, Mavromanolaki Eirini, Flouris Andreas D

机构信息

Discovery Foundation, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.

FAME Laboratory, Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, University of Thessaly, Trikala, Greece.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 May 25;11(5):e34071. doi: 10.2196/34071.

DOI:10.2196/34071
PMID:35612890
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9178449/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Expanding the cooperation and enlarging the participation of more diverse stakeholders within innovation ecosystems will increase their efficiency and capacity to contribute at local, regional, and national levels.

OBJECTIVE

This paper presents the protocol for a systematic review that will identify "opening-up" strategies of innovation ecosystems for increasing the participation of more diverse innovation stakeholders, particularly from low-innovation countries, during the ecosystem formation period.

METHODS

An algorithmic search in 4 databases (Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Social Science Research Network) will be applied based on the PerSPecTIF (perspective, setting, phenomenon of interest/problem, environment, optional comparison, time/timing, and findings) methodology, the Cochrane guidelines for qualitative evidence synthesis, and the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Selection criteria for eligibility include peer-reviewed articles published after December 31, 1999, and containing original data. No restrictions will be placed on the article language and study region, design, or methodology. Methodological strengths and limitations will be assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. The thematic synthesis method will be adopted, and the GRADE-CERQual tool will be used to assess confidence.

RESULTS

A preliminary search in Web of Science revealed 2758 records. This work is part of the ANGIE project, which was funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant 952152) in January 2021. We anticipate that the results of this systematic review will be published in spring 2022.

CONCLUSIONS

We anticipate that the outcomes of this systematic review will outline the best practices used by initiatives and networks, as well as their impacts on creating larger and more inclusive ecosystems.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

OSF Registries osf.io/hc62k 10.17605/OSF.IO/HC62K.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/34071.

摘要

背景

在创新生态系统中扩大合作并让更多样化的利益相关者参与进来,将提高其在地方、区域和国家层面的贡献效率和能力。

目的

本文介绍了一项系统评价的方案,该评价将确定创新生态系统的“开放”策略,以增加更多样化的创新利益相关者的参与度,特别是在生态系统形成阶段来自低创新国家的利益相关者。

方法

将基于PerSPecTIF(视角、背景、感兴趣的现象/问题、环境、可选比较、时间/时机和结果)方法、Cochrane定性证据综合指南以及PRISMA(系统评价和元分析的首选报告项目)指南,在4个数据库(科学引文索引、Cochrane图书馆、Scopus和社会科学研究网络)中进行算法检索。纳入标准包括1999年12月31日之后发表的、包含原始数据的同行评审文章。对文章语言、研究地区、设计或方法不设限制。将使用批判性评价技能计划工具评估方法的优势和局限性。将采用主题综合方法,并使用GRADE-CERQual工具评估可信度。

结果

在科学引文索引中进行的初步检索显示有2758条记录。这项工作是ANGIE项目的一部分,该项目于2021年1月由欧盟的“地平线2020”研究与创新计划(资助编号952152)资助。我们预计该系统评价的结果将于2022年春季发表。

结论

我们预计该系统评价的结果将概述各项举措和网络所采用的最佳实践及其对创建更大、更具包容性的生态系统的影响。

试验注册

OSF注册库osf.io/hc62k 10.17605/OSF.IO/HC62K。

国际注册报告识别号(IRRID):PRR1-10.2196/34071。