Institute for Health and Wellbeing, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
Institute for Health and Wellbeing, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
BMJ Open. 2022 May 24;12(5):e057449. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057449.
Sexual violence is commonplace and has serious adverse consequences for physical and mental health. Sexual Assault Referral Centres (SARCs) are viewed as a best practice response. Little is known about their effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. Long-term data on the health and well-being of those who have experienced rape and sexual assault are also lacking.
This is a mixed-methods protocol for a 1-year cohort study aiming to examine the health and well-being in survivors of sexual violence after attending a SARC in England. Quantitative measures are being taken at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Post-traumatic stress (PTS) is the primary outcome (target N=270 at 12-month follow-up). Secondary measures include anxiety, depression, substance use and sexual health and well-being. Using mixed-effects regression, our main analysis will examine whether variation in SARC service delivery and subsequent mental healthcare is associated with improvement in trauma symptoms after 12 months. An economic analysis will compare costs and outcomes associated with different organisational aspects of SARC service delivery and levels of satisfaction with care. A nested qualitative study will employ narrative analysis of transcribed interviews with 30 cohort participants and 20 survivors who have not experienced SARC services.
The research is supported by an independent study steering committee, data monitoring and ethics committee and patient and public involvement (PPI) group. A central guiding principle of the research is that being involved should feel diametrically opposed to being a victim of sexual violence, and be experienced as empowering and supportive. Our PPI representatives are instrumental in this, and our wider stakeholders encourage us to consider the health and well-being of all involved. We will disseminate widely through peer-reviewed articles and non-academic channels to maximise the impact of findings on commissioning of services and support for survivors.
ISRCTN30846825.
性暴力很常见,会对身心健康造成严重的不良后果。性侵犯转介中心(SARC)被视为一种最佳实践应对方式。然而,人们对其有效性和成本效益知之甚少。此外,也缺乏对经历过强奸和性侵犯的人的长期健康和幸福感的数据。
这是一项为期 1 年的队列研究的混合方法方案,旨在研究英格兰性侵犯转介中心(SARC)就诊后的性暴力幸存者的健康和幸福感。在基线、6 个月和 12 个月时进行定量测量。创伤后应激障碍(PTS)是主要结局(12 个月随访时目标 N=270)。次要测量包括焦虑、抑郁、物质使用和性健康与幸福感。使用混合效应回归,我们的主要分析将检验 SARC 服务提供和随后的心理健康保健的变化是否与 12 个月后创伤症状的改善相关。经济分析将比较 SARC 服务提供的不同组织方面以及对护理的满意度与成本和结果之间的关系。一项嵌套的定性研究将采用对 30 名队列参与者和 20 名未接受 SARC 服务的幸存者的转录访谈的叙述性分析。
该研究得到了独立研究指导委员会、数据监测和伦理委员会以及患者和公众参与(PPI)小组的支持。研究的一个核心指导原则是,参与应该与性暴力受害者的感觉截然相反,并且应该被体验为赋权和支持。我们的 PPI 代表在这方面发挥了重要作用,我们的更广泛的利益相关者鼓励我们考虑所有相关人员的健康和幸福感。我们将通过同行评议的文章和非学术渠道广泛传播,以最大限度地提高研究结果对服务委托和对幸存者的支持的影响。
ISRCTN30846825。