Taylor Jamie, Collins Dave, Ashford Michael
Grey Matters Performance Limited, Stratford upon Avon, United Kingdom.
School of Health and Human Performance, Faculty of Science and Health, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 May 9;4:823488. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.823488. eCollection 2022.
In recent years, high-performance sport has seen a rising interest in Psychological Safety, a construct with a strong empirical basis in certain business contexts. As research and practice interest grows in PS, there are early indications of practitioners and, to a lesser extent research, treating the construct as being universally transferable. We offer three central concerns with this situation. Firstly, it seems that a variety of different interpretations in use may limit the practical application of the construct. Secondly, a concern that not all dimensions of PS are transferable or applicable in the HPSs context, especially for athletes. Finally, emerging evidence from outside of sport suggests potential downsides to the perceptions of PS in a performance/selection sets. We suggest that, as with all theories and constructs, there is a pressing need for nuance and context-specific evidence in how researchers and practitioners approach transferability plus, perhaps, a little more understanding of the real-world high-performance context.
近年来,高性能运动领域对心理安全的兴趣日益浓厚,心理安全这一概念在某些商业背景下有着坚实的实证基础。随着对心理安全的研究和实践兴趣不断增长,有早期迹象表明,从业者以及在较小程度上的研究,将这一概念视为普遍可转移的。我们对这种情况提出三个主要担忧。首先,似乎使用中的各种不同解释可能会限制该概念的实际应用。其次,有人担心并非心理安全的所有维度都可转移或适用于高性能运动情境,尤其是对运动员而言。最后,来自体育领域之外的新证据表明,在绩效/选拔环境中对心理安全的认知可能存在潜在弊端。我们建议,与所有理论和概念一样,研究人员和从业者在处理可转移性时迫切需要注重细微差别和特定情境的证据,此外,或许还需要对现实世界中的高性能情境有更多了解。