Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, and Institute for Immunology and Immunological Diseases, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2023 Apr;41(4):792-799. doi: 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/vmrk76. Epub 2022 May 19.
This study applied the 2022 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (the 2022 ACR/EULAR) criteria for microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) to patients with previously diagnosed MPA as per the 2007 European Medicines Agency algorithm (the 2007 EMA algorithm) and the 2012 revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference nomenclature of vasculitides (the 2012 CHCC definitions) The concordance rate between the new and old criteria was investigated.
This study included 117 patients with MPA, and the new criteria were applied to these patients. MPA could be classified when the total score is ≥5.
The median age was 64.0 years. The concordance rate between the new and old criteria reached 96.6%. Four patients with previously diagnosed MPA were unclassified. Of these, three patients without myeloperoxidase (MPO)-antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) (or perinuclear [P]-ANCA) were not reclassified as having MPA according to the new criteria, despite histopathological findings that were suggestive of MPA based on both the 2007 EMA algorithm and the 2012 CHCC definitions. Conversely, three of four patients with both MPO-ANCA (or P-ANCA) and proteinase 3 (PR3)- ANCA (or cytoplasmic [C]-ANCA) were reclassified as having both MPA and granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) simultaneously according to the 2022 ACR/EULAR criteria for MPA and GPA.
In the new criteria, excessively high score was assigned to MPO-ANCA (or P-ANCA) and MPA-specific histopathological findings were not considered. Hence, the 2007 EMA algorithm and the 2012 CHCC definitions can be applied as additional criteria to complex cases.
本研究应用 2022 年美国风湿病学会/欧洲抗风湿病联盟(2022 年 ACR/EULAR)显微镜下多血管炎(MPA)标准,对根据 2007 年欧洲药品管理局算法(2007 年 EMA 算法)和 2012 年修订的国际丘奇山血管炎命名共识会议分类(2012 年 CHCC 定义)诊断为 MPA 的患者进行诊断。本研究旨在探讨新旧标准之间的一致性。
本研究纳入 117 例 MPA 患者,应用新标准对这些患者进行分类。当总分为≥5 分时,即可对 MPA 进行分类。
中位年龄为 64.0 岁。新旧标准之间的一致性率达到 96.6%。4 例先前诊断为 MPA 的患者无法分类。其中,3 例无髓过氧化物酶(MPO)-抗中性粒细胞胞质抗体(ANCA)(或核周[P]-ANCA)的患者,尽管根据 2007 年 EMA 算法和 2012 年 CHCC 定义,组织病理学检查结果提示 MPA,但未根据新标准重新分类为 MPA。相反,4 例 MPO-ANCA(或 P-ANCA)和蛋白酶 3(PR3)-ANCA(或细胞质[C]-ANCA)均阳性的患者,根据 2022 年 ACR/EULAR 关于 MPA 和肉芽肿性多血管炎(GPA)的标准,同时重新分类为 MPA 和 GPA。
在新标准中,MPO-ANCA(或 P-ANCA)的评分过高,且未考虑 MPA 特异性的组织病理学表现。因此,2007 年 EMA 算法和 2012 年 CHCC 定义可作为复杂病例的补充标准。