Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242, United States.
Computational Physics Laboratory, Department of Physics, Pamukkale University, 20010 Denizli, Turkey.
J Phys Chem Lett. 2022 Jun 9;13(22):4849-4855. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c00982. Epub 2022 May 26.
The low energy excited states of the conformational isomers of solvated azobenzene are calculated with several DFT methods accounting for the solute-solvent interaction implicitly with the polarizable continuum model or explicitly with subsystem DFT. For the latter, embedding potentials are calculated for 21 sampled snapshots of the solvent molecules. First, we find that accounting for the solvent implicitly or explicitly has little effect on the predicted cis-trans S excitation energy gap. Second, we find that azobenzene's S cis and trans energies are accurate as long as a screened range-separated hybrid exchange-correlation functional is employed. Finally, we also tested a simplified workflow whereby a single, averaged, embedding potential is used. Unfortunately, we find larger deviations against the experiment for the simplified workflow. This highlights a basic flaw in the approach, where the time scale of solvent averaging is much longer than that of the solute's electronic polarization.
用几种考虑溶剂-溶质相互作用的 DFT 方法计算了溶剂化偶氮苯构象异构体的低能激发态,这些方法或通过极化连续模型隐式考虑,或通过子体系 DFT 显式考虑。对于后者,计算了溶剂分子 21 个采样快照的嵌入势。首先,我们发现,隐式或显式地考虑溶剂对预测的顺反 S 激发能隙几乎没有影响。其次,我们发现只要采用屏蔽的范围分离混合交换相关泛函,偶氮苯的 S 顺式和反式能量是准确的。最后,我们还测试了一种简化的工作流程,其中使用单个平均的嵌入势。不幸的是,我们发现简化工作流程与实验的偏差更大。这突出了该方法的一个基本缺陷,即溶剂平均的时间尺度比溶质的电子极化时间尺度长得多。