• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卫生系统的弹性源自何处?对瑞士非政府组织观点的定性分析。

What makes health systems resilient? A qualitative analysis of the perspectives of Swiss NGOs.

机构信息

Swiss Centre for International Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.

University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Global Health. 2022 May 26;18(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00848-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12992-022-00848-y
PMID:35619166
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9134130/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Resilience has become relevant than ever before with the advent of increasing and intensifying shocks on the health system and its amplified effects due to globalization. Using the example of non-state actors based in Switzerland, the aim of this study is to explore how and to what extent NGOs with an interest in global health have dealt with unexpected shocks on the health systems of their partner countries and to reflect on the practical implications of resilience for the multiple actors involved. Consequently, this paper analyses the key attributes of resilience that targeted investments may influence, and the different roles key stakeholders may assume to build resilience.

METHODS

This is a descriptive and exploratory qualitative study analysing the perspectives on health system resilience of Swiss-based NGOs through 20 in-depth interviews. Analysis proceeded using a data-driven thematic analysis closely following the framework method. An analytical framework was developed and applied systematically resulting in a complete framework matrix. The results are categorised into the expected role of the governments, the role of the NGOs, and practical future steps for building health system resilience.

RESULTS

The following four key 'foundations of resilience' were found to be dominant for unleashing greater resilience attributes regardless of the nature of shocks: 'realigned relationships,' 'foresight,' 'motivation,' and 'emergency preparedness.' The attribute to 'integrate' was shown to be one of the most crucial characteristics of resilience expected of the national governments from the NGOs, which points to the heightened role of governance. Meanwhile, as a key stakeholder group that is becoming inevitably more powerful in international development cooperation and global health governance, non-state actors namely the NGOs saw themselves in a unique position to facilitate knowledge exchange and to support long-term adaptations of innovative solutions that are increasing in demand. The strongest determinant of resilience in the health system was the degree of investments made for building long-term infrastructures and human resource development which are well-functioning prior to any potential crisis.

CONCLUSIONS

Health system resilience is a collective endeavour and a result of many stakeholders' consistent and targeted investments. These investments open up new opportunities to seek innovative solutions and to keep diverse actors in global health accountable. The experiences and perspectives of Swiss NGOs in this article highlight the vital role NGOs may play in building resilient health systems in their partner countries. Specifically, strong governance, a bi-directional knowledge exchange, and the focus on leveraging science for impact can draw greater potential of resilience in the health systems. Governments and the NGOs have unique points of contribution in this journey towards resilience and bear the responsibility to support governments to prioritise investing in the key 'foundations of resilience' in order to activate greater attributes of resilience. Resilience building will not only prepare countries for future shocks but bridge the disparate health and development agenda in order to better address the nexus between humanitarian aid and development cooperation.

摘要

背景

随着卫生系统面临的冲击日益增多且不断加剧,以及全球化带来的放大效应,韧性比以往任何时候都更加重要。本研究以瑞士境内的非国家行为体为例,旨在探讨对伙伴国卫生系统具有全球卫生兴趣的非政府组织(NGO)如何应对卫生系统的意外冲击,以及思考韧性对所涉多方的实际意义。因此,本文分析了有针对性的投资可能影响韧性的关键属性,以及各主要利益相关方为增强韧性可发挥的不同作用。

方法

这是一项描述性和探索性的定性研究,通过 20 次深入访谈分析了瑞士 NGO 对卫生系统韧性的看法。分析采用了一种数据驱动的主题分析方法,紧密遵循框架方法。制定并系统应用了一个分析框架,从而形成了一个完整的框架矩阵。结果分为政府的预期作用、非政府组织的作用以及增强卫生系统韧性的实际后续步骤。

结果

无论冲击的性质如何,发现以下四个关键的“韧性基础”是释放更大韧性属性的主要因素:“调整后的关系”、“前瞻性”、“动机”和“应急准备”。被认为是韧性的最关键特征之一的“整合”属性,是 NGO 对政府的期望,这表明治理的作用有所增强。同时,非政府组织作为国际发展合作和全球卫生治理中日益强大的关键利益相关方群体,认为自己处于促进知识交流和支持对创新解决方案的长期适应的独特地位,而这些解决方案的需求不断增加。卫生系统中韧性的最强决定因素是为建设长期基础设施和人力资源开发进行投资的程度,这些投资在任何潜在危机之前都运作良好。

结论

卫生系统韧性是多方共同努力的结果,也是许多利益相关方持续和有针对性投资的结果。这些投资为寻求创新解决方案和使参与全球卫生的各方承担责任开辟了新的机会。本文中瑞士 NGO 的经验和观点突出了 NGO 在建设伙伴国有韧性的卫生系统方面可能发挥的重要作用。具体而言,强有力的治理、双向知识交流以及注重利用科学产生影响,可以挖掘卫生系统更大的韧性潜力。政府和非政府组织在这一韧性之旅中具有独特的贡献点,有责任支持政府优先投资于关键的“韧性基础”,以激活更大的韧性属性。韧性建设不仅将使各国为未来的冲击做好准备,还将弥合卫生和发展议程之间的差距,以便更好地处理人道主义援助与发展合作之间的关系。

相似文献

1
What makes health systems resilient? A qualitative analysis of the perspectives of Swiss NGOs.卫生系统的弹性源自何处?对瑞士非政府组织观点的定性分析。
Global Health. 2022 May 26;18(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00848-y.
2
Evidence of health system resilience in Myanmar during Cyclone Nargis: a qualitative analysis.缅甸在纳尔吉斯气旋期间的卫生系统恢复力证据:定性分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 22;11(9):e050700. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050700.
3
Enhancing the Understanding of Resilience in Health Systems of Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.提升对中低收入国家卫生系统韧性的理解:一项定性证据综合研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Jul 1;11(7):899-911. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.261. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
4
Understanding the role of community resilience in addressing the Ebola virus disease epidemic in Liberia: a qualitative study (community resilience in Liberia).理解社区韧性在解决利比里亚埃博拉病毒病疫情中的作用:一项定性研究(利比里亚的社区韧性)。
Glob Health Action. 2019;12(1):1662682. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2019.1662682.
5
Multisectoral action towards sustainable development goal 3.d and building health systems resilience during and beyond COVID-19: Findings from an INTOSAI development initiative and World Health Organization collaboration.多部门行动以实现可持续发展目标 3.d 并在 COVID-19 期间和之后增强卫生系统的弹性:来自国际审计组织发展倡议和世界卫生组织合作的发现。
Front Public Health. 2023 May 19;11:1104669. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1104669. eCollection 2023.
6
Health systems resilience in practice: a scoping review to identify strategies for building resilience.健康系统弹性的实践:识别建立弹性策略的范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 19;22(1):1173. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08544-8.
7
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
8
Strengthening the community health program in Liberia: Lessons learned from a health system approach to inform program design and better prepare for future shocks.加强利比里亚社区卫生项目:从卫生系统方法中吸取的经验教训,为项目设计提供信息,并为未来的冲击做好更好的准备。
J Glob Health. 2021 Mar 10;11:07002. doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.07002.
9
Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).大分子拥挤现象:化学与物理邂逅生物学(瑞士阿斯科纳,2012年6月10日至14日)
Phys Biol. 2013 Aug;10(4):040301. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/4/040301. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
10
How can we strengthen partnership and coordination for health system emergency preparedness and response? Findings from a synthesis of experience across countries facing shocks.我们如何加强伙伴关系和协调,以做好卫生系统应急准备和应对工作?各国应对冲击的经验综合分析得出的结论。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 29;22(1):1441. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08859-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Health System Performance and Resilience in Times of Crisis: An Adapted Conceptual Framework.健康系统在危机时期的绩效和韧性:一个适应性概念框架。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Aug 28;20(17):6666. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20176666.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence of health system resilience in Myanmar during Cyclone Nargis: a qualitative analysis.缅甸在纳尔吉斯气旋期间的卫生系统恢复力证据:定性分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 22;11(9):e050700. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050700.
2
A health systems resilience research agenda: moving from concept to practice.卫生系统弹性研究议程:从概念到实践。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Aug;6(8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006779.
3
Civic Duty: A Booster for Resilience?公民义务:恢复力的助推器?
Int J Public Health. 2021 Jun 30;66:1604064. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2021.1604064. eCollection 2021.
4
Balancing adaptation and innovation for resilience in healthcare - a metasynthesis of narratives.平衡适应与创新以实现医疗保健的弹性——叙事的元综合。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 31;21(1):759. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06592-0.
5
Health systems resilience in managing the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons from 28 countries.应对 COVID-19 大流行的卫生系统韧性:28 个国家的经验教训。
Nat Med. 2021 Jun;27(6):964-980. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01381-y. Epub 2021 May 17.
6
Enhancing the Understanding of Resilience in Health Systems of Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.提升对中低收入国家卫生系统韧性的理解:一项定性证据综合研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Jul 1;11(7):899-911. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.261. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
7
Redesigning health systems for global heath security.为全球卫生安全重新设计卫生系统。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Apr;9(4):e393-e394. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30545-3. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
8
The Power of Collaborative Governance: The Case of South Korea Responding to COVID-19 Pandemic.协作治理的力量:韩国应对新冠疫情的案例
World Med Health Policy. 2020 Dec;12(4):430-442. doi: 10.1002/wmh3.376. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
9
Organizational change and everyday health system resilience: Lessons from Cape Town, South Africa.组织变革与日常卫生系统韧性:来自南非开普敦的经验教训。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Dec;266:113407. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113407. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
10
Telemedicine as the New Outpatient Clinic Gone Digital: Position Paper From the Pandemic Health System REsilience PROGRAM (REPROGRAM) International Consortium (Part 2).远程医疗成为数字化的新门诊:大流行健康系统恢复力计划(REPROGRAM)国际联盟的立场文件(第二部分)。
Front Public Health. 2020 Sep 7;8:410. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00410. eCollection 2020.