Centre for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), Department of Epidemiology and Health Systems, University of Lausanne, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, 4123 Allschwil, Switzerland.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Aug 28;20(17):6666. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20176666.
With the COVID-19 pandemic, the notion of health system (HS) performance has been discussed, and the notion of resilience has become increasingly important. Lacking a recognised framework that measures the performance of HSs throughout a crisis, i.e., one that explicitly includes time as a key aspect, we examined the literature about conceptual frameworks for measuring the performance and the resilience of HSs. This review highlighted a significant diversity among 18 distinct HS performance frameworks and 13 distinct HS resilience frameworks. On this basis, we developed a model that integrates the WHO's widely recognised six building block framework in a novel approach derived from the European Observatory on HSs and Policies. The resulting framework adapts the building blocks to the different stages of a crisis, thereby allowing for a comprehensive assessment of an entire health system's performance throughout the crisis's duration, while also considering the key aspect of resilience. For a more pragmatic use of this framework in the future, indicators will be developed as a next step.
随着 COVID-19 大流行,人们对卫生系统(HS)绩效的概念进行了讨论,而弹性的概念变得越来越重要。由于缺乏一个公认的框架来衡量危机期间卫生系统的绩效,即一个明确将时间作为关键方面纳入其中的框架,我们对衡量卫生系统绩效和弹性的概念框架的文献进行了审查。这次审查突出了 18 个不同的卫生系统绩效框架和 13 个不同的卫生系统弹性框架之间的显著差异。在此基础上,我们开发了一个模型,该模型将世卫组织广泛认可的六个构建模块框架以一种新颖的方式整合在一起,这种新颖的方式源自欧洲卫生系统和政策观察站。由此产生的框架将构建模块适应危机的不同阶段,从而允许在整个危机持续期间对整个卫生系统的绩效进行全面评估,同时考虑到弹性的关键方面。为了在未来更实际地使用这个框架,下一步将制定指标。