Kim Samuel T, Tran Zachary, Xia Yu, Dobaria Vishal, Ng Ayesha, Benharash Peyman
Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Surg Open Sci. 2022 Apr 20;9:28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2022.04.001. eCollection 2022 Jul.
Safety-net hospitals care for a high proportion of uninsured/underinsured patients who may lack access to longitudinal care. The present study characterized the use of mechanical valves and clinical outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement at safety net hospitals.
All adults undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement were abstracted from the 2016-2018 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Hospitals were divided into quartiles based on volume of all Medicaid and uninsured admissions, with the highest quartile defined as safety net hospitals. Multivariable regression was used to determine the association between safety net hospitals and several outcomes including mechanical valve use, perioperative complications, index hospitalization costs, 90-day readmission, and complications at readmission.
Of the 94,580 patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement, 14.5% of operations were at safety net hospitals. Patients at safety net hospitals more commonly received mechanical valves (20.3% vs 16.9%, P < .01) compared to those at non-safety net hospitals. After adjustment, safety net hospitals remained associated with a greater odds of mechanical aortic valve use (adjusted odds ratio, 1.13, 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.21). However, operation at safety net hospitals was also associated with increased odds of perioperative complications (adjusted odds ratio 1.10, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.17) and higher hospitalization costs ( coefficient +$6.15K, 95% confidence interval +$5.26 - +$7.03) despite similar 90-day readmissions. Upon readmission, safety net hospitals patients were more likely to experience mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.87, 95% confidence interval 1.18-2.98) and stroke (adjusted odds ratio 2.41, 95% confidence interval 1.23-4.70) compared to those at non-safety net hospitals.
Hospital safety net status is associated with increased use of mechanical valves for surgical aortic valve replacement despite also being associated with increased perioperative complications, costs, and significant complications upon readmission. Ability to access adequate follow-up care may be an important consideration for surgical aortic valve replacement at safety net hospitals.
安全网医院诊治的未参保/参保不足患者比例较高,这些患者可能无法获得长期护理。本研究对安全网医院机械瓣膜的使用情况及外科主动脉瓣置换术的临床结局进行了特征分析。
从2016 - 2018年全国再入院数据库中提取所有接受外科主动脉瓣置换术的成年人信息。根据医疗补助和未参保患者的入院量将医院分为四分位数组,最高四分位数组定义为安全网医院。采用多变量回归分析来确定安全网医院与包括机械瓣膜使用、围手术期并发症、首次住院费用、90天再入院率以及再入院时并发症在内的多个结局之间的关联。
在94,580例接受外科主动脉瓣置换术的患者中,14.5%的手术在安全网医院进行。与非安全网医院的患者相比,安全网医院的患者更常接受机械瓣膜置换(20.3%对16.9%,P <.01)。调整后,安全网医院使用机械主动脉瓣的几率仍然更高(调整后的优势比为1.13,95%置信区间为1.05 - 1.21)。然而,尽管90天再入院率相似,但在安全网医院进行手术也与围手术期并发症几率增加(调整后的优势比为1.10,95%置信区间为1.03 - 1.17)和住院费用更高(系数为+$6.15K,95%置信区间为+$5.26 - +$7.03)相关。再入院时,与非安全网医院的患者相比,安全网医院患者的死亡几率(调整后的优势比为1.87,95%置信区间为1.18 - 2.98)和中风几率(调整后的优势比为2.41,95%置信区间为1.23 - 4.70)更高。
医院的安全网状态与外科主动脉瓣置换术中机械瓣膜使用增加相关,尽管同时也与围手术期并发症增加、费用增加以及再入院时的严重并发症相关。能否获得充分的后续护理可能是安全网医院进行外科主动脉瓣置换术时的一个重要考虑因素。