• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

越南女性的乳腺癌筛查实践以及与临床乳房检查接受度相关的因素。

Breast cancer screening practices among Vietnamese women and factors associated with clinical breast examination uptake.

机构信息

Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.

Centre for Population Health Sciences, Hanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 May 27;17(5):e0269228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269228. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0269228
PMID:35622840
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9140272/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study examined current breast cancer (BC) screening practices among Vietnamese women and the factors associated with the uptake of clinical breast examination (CBE).

METHODS

A total of 508 women aged 30-74 years in Hanoi completed a knowledge-attitude-practice (KAP) survey in 2019 including validated measures of breast cancer awareness (Breast-CAM) and health beliefs (Champion's Health Belief Model Scale). Descriptive statistics, χ2, and ANOVA tests were used to analyse KAP responses across groups with different sociodemographic characteristics. A logistic regression model assessed the associations of knowledge, beliefs, and sociodemographic characteristics with CBE uptake.

RESULTS

Only 18% of respondents were aware of BC signs, risk factors, and screening modalities although 63% had previously received BC screening. CBE was the most common screening modality with an uptake of 51%. A significantly higher proportion of urban residents compared with rural residents (32% vs 18%, Chi-square test, p = 0.04) received mammography. Unlike mammography, CBE uptake was not associated with sociodemographic characteristics (i.e., residence area/education level/occupation/household monthly income/possession of health insurance). CBE uptake was associated with BC knowledge (OR = 2.44, 95%CI: 1.37-4.32), perceived susceptibility to BC (OR = 1.15, 95%CI: 1.05-1.25), and perceived barriers to accessing CBE (OR = 0.88, 95%CI: 0.84-0.92).

CONCLUSION

The study points to the need for public health education and promotion interventions to address low levels of awareness about BC and to increase uptake of BC screening in Vietnam in advance of screening programme planning and implementation. It also suggests that screening programmes using CBE are promising given current engagement and the absence of socio-demographic disparities.

摘要

背景

本研究考察了越南女性当前的乳腺癌(BC)筛查实践以及与临床乳房检查(CBE)接受度相关的因素。

方法

2019 年,河内共有 508 名年龄在 30-74 岁的女性完成了一项知识-态度-实践(KAP)调查,其中包括经过验证的乳腺癌意识(Breast-CAM)和健康信念(Champion 的健康信念模型量表)测量方法。使用描述性统计、卡方检验和方差分析检验了不同社会人口统计学特征组的 KAP 应答情况。逻辑回归模型评估了知识、信念和社会人口统计学特征与 CBE 接受度的关联。

结果

尽管 63%的受访者之前接受过乳腺癌筛查,但仅有 18%的受访者知晓乳腺癌的体征、危险因素和筛查方式。CBE 是最常见的筛查方式,接受率为 51%。与农村居民相比,城市居民接受乳房 X 线摄影术的比例明显更高(32%比 18%,卡方检验,p=0.04)。与乳房 X 线摄影术不同,CBE 接受度与社会人口统计学特征(即居住地区/教育水平/职业/家庭月收入/是否拥有医疗保险)无关。CBE 接受度与乳腺癌知识(OR=2.44,95%CI:1.37-4.32)、对乳腺癌的易感性感知(OR=1.15,95%CI:1.05-1.25)和获得 CBE 的障碍感知(OR=0.88,95%CI:0.84-0.92)有关。

结论

该研究表明,需要开展公共卫生教育和促进干预措施,以提高越南对乳腺癌的认识,并在规划和实施筛查计划之前提高乳腺癌筛查的接受度。鉴于目前的参与度和缺乏社会人口统计学差异,使用 CBE 的筛查计划具有很大的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eca3/9140272/bf8ac61c768b/pone.0269228.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eca3/9140272/bf8ac61c768b/pone.0269228.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eca3/9140272/bf8ac61c768b/pone.0269228.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Breast cancer screening practices among Vietnamese women and factors associated with clinical breast examination uptake.越南女性的乳腺癌筛查实践以及与临床乳房检查接受度相关的因素。
PLoS One. 2022 May 27;17(5):e0269228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269228. eCollection 2022.
2
Reliability and validity of Champion's Health Belief Model Scale for breast cancer screening among Malaysian women.马来西亚女性乳腺癌筛查中冠军健康信念模型量表的信度和效度
Singapore Med J. 2008 Nov;49(11):897-903.
3
Health beliefs, illness perceptions and determinants of breast screening uptake in Malta: a cross-sectional survey.马耳他乳腺癌筛查接受情况的健康信念、疾病认知及决定因素:一项横断面调查。
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 8;17(1):416. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4324-6.
4
Breast cancer screening knowledge, attitudes, and practices among Korean American women.韩裔美国女性的乳腺癌筛查知识、态度及行为
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2000 Nov-Dec;27(10):1585-91.
5
Determine knowledge and belief of Somalian young women about breast cancer and breast self-examination with champion health belief model: a cross-sectional study.采用健康信念模式调查索马里年轻女性对乳腺癌和乳房自我检查的知识和信念:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Dec 8;22(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-02065-4.
6
Breast cancer screening among women in Thailand: analyses of population-based household surveys.泰国女性的乳腺癌筛查:基于人群的家庭调查分析
J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 Nov;97(11):1106-18.
7
Association of Sociodemographic Factors, Breast Cancer Fear, and Perceived Self-Efficacy With Breast Cancer Screening Behaviors Among Middle-Aged Nigerian Women.尼日利亚中年女性社会人口学因素、乳腺癌恐惧及自我效能感与乳腺癌筛查行为的关联
Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2021 Sep 30;15:11782234211043651. doi: 10.1177/11782234211043651. eCollection 2021.
8
Determinants of screening methods utilization among Iraq/Sulaimani women.伊拉克/苏莱曼尼亚妇女筛查方法利用的决定因素。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2020 Oct 29;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-08-2018-0203.
9
Predictors of breast cancer screening uptake: a pre intervention community survey in Malaysia.乳腺癌筛查接受情况的预测因素:马来西亚一项干预前社区调查
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(7):3443-9. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.7.3443.
10
Awareness and prevalence of mammography screening and its predictors--a cross sectional study in a primary care clinic in Malaysia.乳房X光筛查的知晓率、患病率及其预测因素——马来西亚一家初级保健诊所的横断面研究
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(19):8095-9. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.19.8095.

引用本文的文献

1
Neoadjuvant Docetaxel-Carboplatin-Trastuzumab Therapy in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Single-Center Experience from Vietnam.多西他赛-卡铂-曲妥珠单抗新辅助治疗HER2阳性乳腺癌:越南单中心经验
Cancer Manag Res. 2025 Aug 31;17:1851-1858. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S537882. eCollection 2025.
2
Barriers to cancer screening uptake and approaches to overcome them: a systematic literature review.癌症筛查普及的障碍及克服这些障碍的方法:一项系统的文献综述
Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 6;15:1575820. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1575820. eCollection 2025.
3
Study of Treatment Modalities and Clinical Outcomes of Screen-Detected Cancers at a Tertiary Care Unit in the UK.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of clinical breast examination as a 'stand-alone' screening modality: an overview of systematic reviews.临床乳房检查作为一种“独立”筛查方式的有效性:系统评价概述。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Nov 9;20(1):1070. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07521-w.
2
Impact of a mass media campaign on breast cancer symptoms awareness and screening uptake in Malaysia: findings from a quasi-experimental study.大众媒体宣传活动对马来西亚乳腺癌症状认知和筛查参与度的影响:一项准实验研究的结果。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 20;10(8):e036503. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036503.
3
Factors associated with breast cancer screening participation among women in mainland China: a systematic review.
英国一家三级医疗机构中筛查发现癌症的治疗方式及临床结局研究。
Cureus. 2025 May 14;17(5):e84076. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84076. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Clinical breast cancer screening uptake and associated factors among reproductive age women in Kenya: further analysis of Kenyan Demographic and Health Survey 2022.肯尼亚育龄妇女的临床乳腺癌筛查接受情况及相关因素:对2022年肯尼亚人口与健康调查的进一步分析
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 1;20(4):e0320730. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320730. eCollection 2025.
5
Multilevel analysis of undergoing clinical breast examination and its associated factors among mothers of reproductive age in Kenya: Kenyan Demographic and Health Survey 2022.肯尼亚育龄母亲接受临床乳房检查及其相关因素的多水平分析:2022年肯尼亚人口与健康调查
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 6;20(3):e0319183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319183. eCollection 2025.
6
A Comprehensive Model for Understanding Breast Cancer Screening Hesitancy: Integrating the Health Belief Model and the Confidence, Convenience, Complacency, Constraints, and Risk and Responsibility Calculations (5C) Model.一个理解乳腺癌筛查犹豫的综合模型:整合健康信念模型与信心、便利性、自满、限制以及风险和责任计算(5C)模型。
Cureus. 2024 Oct 16;16(10):e71583. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71583. eCollection 2024 Oct.
7
Breast cancer risk assessment based on susceptibility genes and polygenic risk score in Vietnamese women.基于越南女性易感性基因和多基因风险评分的乳腺癌风险评估
BJC Rep. 2024 Oct 8;2(1):80. doi: 10.1038/s44276-024-00100-7.
8
Prevalence of Breast Cancer Screening in Asia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.亚洲地区乳腺癌筛查的流行率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Oct 1;25(10):3379-3391. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.10.3379.
9
Factors Associated With Uptake of Breast Cancer Screening Among Catholic Nuns in Lake Zone, Tanzania.坦桑尼亚湖区天主教修女乳腺癌筛查接受情况的相关因素
Int J Breast Cancer. 2024 Oct 12;2024:5024392. doi: 10.1155/2024/5024392. eCollection 2024.
10
Perceived barriers and factors influencing uptake of breast cancer screening among women: a population-based cross-sectional study.基于人群的横断面研究:女性乳腺癌筛查参与率的影响因素和阻碍因素分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 29;14(1):12291. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62218-5.
中国内地女性参与乳腺癌筛查的影响因素:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 26;9(8):e028705. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028705.
4
Hong Kong female's breast cancer awareness measure: Cross-sectional survey.香港女性乳腺癌认知度调查:横断面研究
World J Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb 24;10(2):98-109. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v10.i2.98.
5
Development and psychometric testing of the Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices (KAP) questionnaire among student Tuberculosis (TB) Patients (STBP-KAPQ) in China.中国学生结核病患者(STBP)知识、态度和实践(KAP)问卷的编制及心理测量学检验。
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 May 8;18(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3122-9.
6
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Screening Program for Breast Cancer in Vietnam.越南乳腺癌筛查项目的成本效益分析
Value Health Reg Issues. 2013 May;2(1):21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
7
The impact of breast cancer awareness interventions on breast screening uptake among women in the United Kingdom: A systematic review.乳腺癌意识干预对英国女性乳房筛查参与度的影响:系统评价。
J Health Psychol. 2019 Jan;24(1):113-124. doi: 10.1177/1359105317697812. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
8
Breast Cancer Screening Programmes across the WHO European Region: Differences among Countries Based on National Income Level.世界卫生组织欧洲区域的乳腺癌筛查计划:基于国民收入水平的国家间差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Apr 23;14(4):452. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14040452.
9
Should low-income countries invest in breast cancer screening?低收入国家应该投资于乳腺癌筛查吗?
Cancer Causes Control. 2016 Nov;27(11):1341-1345. doi: 10.1007/s10552-016-0812-8. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
10
Breast Cancer Screening for Women at Average Risk: 2015 Guideline Update From the American Cancer Society.平均风险女性的乳腺癌筛查:美国癌症协会2015年指南更新
JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1599-614. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12783.