Ruotsi A, Skrifvars B
Scand J Rheumatol Suppl. 1978(21):28-32. doi: 10.3109/03009747809095672.
The efficacy and tolerance of proquazone, 900 mg, and ibuprofen, 1200 mg, were compared in a randomized, double-blind clinical trial of 6 months' duration, with 44 patients, 21 on proquazone and 23 on ibuprofen. Comparison of proquazone-treated patients with patients treated with iburofen showed a significantly better improvement , as is demonstrated by the significant differences in the Lansbury Index, in nocturnal pain, final assessment of therapeutic effect, and number of interruptions due to lack of efficacy. All differences were in favour of proquazone, proving its therapeutic superiority over ibuprofen. The side effects in the proquazone group were mainly gastrointestinal, and 2 patients broke off treatment prematurely due to diarrhoea (in one patient, lack of efficacy was a contributory cause). A third patient discontinued because of moderate nausea and dizziness. In the ibuprofen group, 4 patients discontinued because of side effects (skin eruptions, dizziness, epigastric discomfort, and one thrombocytopenia) in addition to lack of efficacy. Proquazone seems to be an effective and well tolerated anti-inflammatory analgesic.
在一项为期6个月的随机双盲临床试验中,对44名患者(21名服用丙氧苯宗,23名服用布洛芬)比较了900毫克丙氧苯宗和1200毫克布洛芬的疗效及耐受性。与服用布洛芬的患者相比,服用丙氧苯宗的患者改善情况显著更好,这体现在兰斯伯里指数、夜间疼痛、治疗效果最终评估以及因疗效不佳导致的中断次数上的显著差异。所有差异均有利于丙氧苯宗,证明其治疗效果优于布洛芬。丙氧苯宗组的副作用主要是胃肠道方面的,2名患者因腹泻提前中断治疗(其中1名患者,疗效不佳也是一个促成因素)。第三名患者因中度恶心和头晕停药。在布洛芬组,除疗效不佳外,有4名患者因副作用(皮疹、头晕、上腹部不适和1例血小板减少症)停药。丙氧苯宗似乎是一种有效且耐受性良好的抗炎镇痛药。