Suppr超能文献

一项比较普罗喹宗和萘普生治疗类风湿性关节炎的双盲试验。

A comparative, double-blind trial with proquazone and naproxen in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

作者信息

Bragstad A

出版信息

Scand J Rheumatol Suppl. 1978(21):33-5. doi: 10.3109/03009747809095673.

Abstract

In a double-blind trial lasting 6 months, 36 patients with classical or definity rheumatoid arthritis were divided into two groups, one receiving 3x300 mg proquazone/day and the other 2x250 mg naproxen plus one placebo capsule/day. Efficacy parameters were assessed and laboratory tests performed at regular intervals throughout the trial. Both drugs were well tolerated, in that no abnormal changes were found in the results of laboratory tests in either group, and that drug-related side effects, mainly gastrointestinal disturbances, occurred in just over half the cases in each group. Both drugs improved the Lansbury Index, especially grip strength, walking time, and ESR. Proquazone did significantly better than naproxen in improving ESR and nocturnal pain. More therpaeutic successes were recorded with proquazone than with naproxen in the overall assessment at the end of the trial.

摘要

在一项为期6个月的双盲试验中,36例典型或确诊的类风湿性关节炎患者被分为两组,一组每天服用3×300毫克丙磺唑酮,另一组每天服用2×250毫克萘普生加一粒安慰剂胶囊。在整个试验过程中定期评估疗效参数并进行实验室检查。两种药物耐受性良好,两组实验室检查结果均未发现异常变化,且每组略超过半数病例出现与药物相关的副作用,主要是胃肠道不适。两种药物均改善了兰斯伯里指数,尤其是握力、步行时间和血沉。在改善血沉和夜间疼痛方面,丙磺唑酮比萘普生显著更有效。在试验结束时的总体评估中,丙磺唑酮记录的治疗成功案例比萘普生更多。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验