• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于全国登记注册队列研究的机器学习预测卒中后 30 天死亡率。

Risk prediction of 30-day mortality after stroke using machine learning: a nationwide registry-based cohort study.

机构信息

School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.

NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Neurol. 2022 May 27;22(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02722-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12883-022-02722-1
PMID:35624434
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9137068/
Abstract

BACKGROUNDS

We aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models for 30-day stroke mortality for mortality risk stratification and as benchmarking models for quality improvement in stroke care.

METHODS

Data from the UK Sentinel Stroke National Audit Program between 2013 to 2019 were used. Models were developed using XGBoost, Logistic Regression (LR), LR with elastic net with/without interaction terms using 80% randomly selected admissions from 2013 to 2018, validated on the 20% remaining admissions, and temporally validated on 2019 admissions. The models were developed with 30 variables. A reference model was developed using LR and 4 variables. Performances of all models was evaluated in terms of discrimination, calibration, reclassification, Brier scores and Decision-curves.

RESULTS

In total, 488,497 stroke patients with a 12.3% 30-day mortality rate were included in the analysis. In 2019 temporal validation set, XGBoost model obtained the lowest Brier score (0.069 (95% CI: 0.068-0.071)) and the highest area under the ROC curve (AUC) (0.895 (95% CI: 0.891-0.900)) which outperformed LR reference model by 0.04 AUC (p < 0.001) and LR with elastic net and interaction term model by 0.003 AUC (p < 0.001). All models were perfectly calibrated for low (< 5%) and moderate risk groups (5-15%) and ≈1% underestimation for high-risk groups (> 15%). The XGBoost model reclassified 1648 (8.1%) low-risk cases by the LR reference model as being moderate or high-risk and gained the most net benefit in decision curve analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

All models with 30 variables are potentially useful as benchmarking models in stroke-care quality improvement with ML slightly outperforming others.

摘要

背景

我们旨在开发和验证用于 30 天卒中死亡率的机器学习 (ML) 模型,以进行死亡率风险分层,并作为卒中护理质量改进的基准模型。

方法

使用了 2013 年至 2019 年英国 Sentinel Stroke 国家审计计划的数据。使用 XGBoost、逻辑回归 (LR)、具有/不具有交互项的弹性网络逻辑回归,从 2013 年至 2018 年随机选择 80%的入院患者建立模型,对剩余的 20%入院患者进行验证,并对 2019 年的入院患者进行时间验证。模型使用 30 个变量进行开发。使用 LR 和 4 个变量开发参考模型。通过判别能力、校准度、再分类、Brier 评分和决策曲线评估所有模型的性能。

结果

共纳入 488497 例卒中患者,30 天死亡率为 12.3%。在 2019 年的时间验证集,XGBoost 模型获得了最低的 Brier 评分(0.069(95%置信区间:0.068-0.071))和最高的 AUC(0.895(95%置信区间:0.891-0.900)),优于 LR 参考模型 0.04 AUC(p<0.001)和 LR 与弹性网络和交互项模型 0.003 AUC(p<0.001)。所有模型在低(<5%)和中危组(5-15%)的校准效果完美,在高危组(>15%)的校准效果略低。XGBoost 模型将 LR 参考模型的 1648(8.1%)例低危病例重新分类为中危或高危病例,并在决策曲线分析中获得最大的净获益。

结论

所有包含 30 个变量的模型都可作为卒中护理质量改进的基准模型,具有一定的潜在应用价值,ML 模型的性能略优于其他模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5c2/9137068/2d7c121b2b8b/12883_2022_2722_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5c2/9137068/7408249694fc/12883_2022_2722_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5c2/9137068/55c0916bc298/12883_2022_2722_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5c2/9137068/b9eea240d90e/12883_2022_2722_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5c2/9137068/2d7c121b2b8b/12883_2022_2722_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5c2/9137068/7408249694fc/12883_2022_2722_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5c2/9137068/55c0916bc298/12883_2022_2722_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5c2/9137068/b9eea240d90e/12883_2022_2722_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5c2/9137068/2d7c121b2b8b/12883_2022_2722_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk prediction of 30-day mortality after stroke using machine learning: a nationwide registry-based cohort study.基于全国登记注册队列研究的机器学习预测卒中后 30 天死亡率。
BMC Neurol. 2022 May 27;22(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02722-1.
2
Developing and externally validating a machine learning risk prediction model for 30-day mortality after stroke using national stroke registers in the UK and Sweden.利用英国和瑞典的国家卒中登记处开发和外部验证中风后 30 天死亡率的机器学习风险预测模型。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 15;13(11):e069811. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069811.
3
Comparison of machine learning techniques in prediction of mortality following cardiac surgery: analysis of over 220 000 patients from a large national database.机器学习技术在心脏手术后死亡率预测中的比较:来自大型国家数据库的 22 万多例患者的分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Jun 1;63(6). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad183.
4
Predicting 30-day mortality after ST elevation myocardial infarction: Machine learning- based random forest and its external validation using two independent nationwide datasets.预测 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死 30 天后的死亡率:基于机器学习的随机森林及其使用两个独立的全国性数据集进行的外部验证。
J Cardiol. 2021 Nov;78(5):439-446. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.06.002. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
5
Predictors of 30-Day Mortality Among Dutch Patients Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Surgery, 2011-2016.2011-2016 年荷兰结直肠癌手术患者 30 天死亡率的预测因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e217737. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7737.
6
Use of Machine Learning Models to Predict Death After Acute Myocardial Infarction.利用机器学习模型预测急性心肌梗死后的死亡。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Jun 1;6(6):633-641. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.0122.
7
Use of machine learning models to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome.使用机器学习模型预测急性冠状动脉综合征患者的院内死亡率。
Clin Cardiol. 2023 Feb;46(2):184-194. doi: 10.1002/clc.23957. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
8
Development and Validation of Unplanned Extubation Prediction Models Using Intensive Care Unit Data: Retrospective, Comparative, Machine Learning Study.基于 ICU 数据的非计划性拔管预测模型的开发和验证:回顾性、对比、机器学习研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 11;23(8):e23508. doi: 10.2196/23508.
9
Predicting Sepsis Mortality in a Population-Based National Database: Machine Learning Approach.基于人群的国家数据库中预测脓毒症死亡率:机器学习方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 13;24(4):e29982. doi: 10.2196/29982.
10
Comparative analysis of machine learning vs. traditional modeling approaches for predicting in-hospital mortality after cardiac surgery: temporal and spatial external validation based on a nationwide cardiac surgery registry.心脏手术后预测院内死亡率的机器学习与传统建模方法的比较分析:基于全国心脏手术登记处的时间和空间外部验证
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2024 Mar 1;10(2):121-131. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad028.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and Modified Rankin Scale on Predictive Models of 30-Day Nonelective Readmission and Mortality After Ischemic Stroke: Cohort Study.美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表和改良Rankin量表对缺血性卒中后30天非选择性再入院和死亡率预测模型的影响:队列研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 May 9;13:e69102. doi: 10.2196/69102.
2
Predicting stroke occurrences: a stacked machine learning approach with feature selection and data preprocessing.预测中风发生:具有特征选择和数据预处理的堆叠机器学习方法。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2024 Oct 15;25(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12859-024-05866-8.
3
Clinical decision support systems for 3-month mortality in elderly patients admitted to ICU with ischemic stroke using interpretable machine learning.
使用可解释机器学习的针对入住重症监护病房的老年缺血性中风患者3个月死亡率的临床决策支持系统
Digit Health. 2024 Sep 17;10:20552076241280126. doi: 10.1177/20552076241280126. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
Developing machine learning models to predict multi-class functional outcomes and death three months after stroke in Sweden.开发机器学习模型预测瑞典卒中后三个月的多类功能结局和死亡。
PLoS One. 2024 May 13;19(5):e0303287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303287. eCollection 2024.
5
Development and internal validation of machine learning-based models and external validation of existing risk scores for outcome prediction in patients with ischaemic stroke.基于机器学习的模型的开发与内部验证以及现有风险评分在缺血性中风患者预后预测中的外部验证
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2023 Nov 22;5(2):109-122. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztad073. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Developing and externally validating a machine learning risk prediction model for 30-day mortality after stroke using national stroke registers in the UK and Sweden.利用英国和瑞典的国家卒中登记处开发和外部验证中风后 30 天死亡率的机器学习风险预测模型。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 15;13(11):e069811. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069811.
7
Machine Learning Application: A Bibliometric Analysis From a Half-Century of Research on Stroke.机器学习应用:对半个世纪中风研究的文献计量分析
Cureus. 2023 Aug 26;15(8):e44142. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44142. eCollection 2023 Aug.
8
Twenty-eight-day in-hospital mortality prediction for elderly patients with ischemic stroke in the intensive care unit: Interpretable machine learning models.重症监护病房老年缺血性脑卒中患者 28 天住院死亡率预测:可解释的机器学习模型。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 12;10:1086339. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1086339. eCollection 2022.
9
Correction: Risk prediction of 30-day mortality after stroke using machine learning: a nationwide registry-based cohort study.更正:使用机器学习预测卒中后30天死亡率:一项基于全国登记处的队列研究。
BMC Neurol. 2022 Aug 25;22(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02840-w.