Zapała Łukasz, Ślusarczyk Aleksander, Wolański Rafał, Kurzyna Paweł, Garbas Karolina, Zapała Piotr, Radziszewski Piotr
Clinic of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Lindleya 4, 02-005 Warsaw, Poland.
Biomedicines. 2022 May 23;10(5):1202. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10051202.
We aimed at a determination of the relevance of comorbidities and selected inflammatory markers to the survival of patients with primary non-metastatic localized clear cell renal cancer (RCC). We retrospectively analyzed data from a single tertiary center on 294 patients who underwent a partial or radical nephrectomy in the years 2012-2018. The following parameters were incorporated in the risk score: tumor stage, grade, size, selected hematological markers (SIRI-systemic inflammatory response index; SII-systemic immune-inflammation index) and a comorbidities assessment tool (CCI-Charlson Comorbidity Index). For further analysis we compared our model with existing prognostic tools. In a multivariate analysis, tumor stage ( = 0.01), tumor grade ( = 0.03), tumor size ( = 0.006) and SII ( = 0.02) were significant predictors of CSS, while tumor grade ( = 0.02), CCI ( = 0.02), tumor size ( = 0.01) and SIRI ( = 0.03) were significant predictors of OS. We demonstrated that our model was characterized by higher accuracy in terms of OS prediction compared to the Leibovich and GRANT models and outperformed the GRANT model in terms of CSS prediction, while non-inferiority to the VENUSS model was revealed. Four different features were included in the predictive models for CSS (grade, size, stage and SII) and OS (grade, size, CCI and SIRI) and were characterized by adequate or even superior accuracy when compared with existing prognostic tools.
我们旨在确定合并症和选定的炎症标志物与原发性非转移性局限性透明细胞肾癌(RCC)患者生存率的相关性。我们回顾性分析了来自单个三级中心的294例在2012年至2018年间接受部分或根治性肾切除术患者的数据。风险评分纳入了以下参数:肿瘤分期、分级、大小、选定的血液学标志物(SIRI-全身炎症反应指数;SII-全身免疫炎症指数)和一种合并症评估工具(CCI-查尔森合并症指数)。为了进一步分析,我们将我们的模型与现有的预后工具进行了比较。在多变量分析中,肿瘤分期(P = 0.01)、肿瘤分级(P = 0.03)、肿瘤大小(P = 0.006)和SII(P = 0.02)是CSS的显著预测因素,而肿瘤分级(P = 0.02)、CCI(P = 0.02)、肿瘤大小(P = 0.01)和SIRI(P = 0.03)是OS的显著预测因素。我们证明,与莱博维奇模型和GRANT模型相比,我们的模型在OS预测方面具有更高的准确性,在CSS预测方面优于GRANT模型,同时显示出不劣于VENUSS模型。CSS预测模型(分级、大小、分期和SII)和OS预测模型(分级、大小、CCI和SIRI)包含四个不同特征,与现有的预后工具相比,其准确性足够甚至更优。