Watanabe Tomoyuki, Hiratsuka Yoshimune, Kita Yoshiyuki, Tamura Hiroshi, Kawasaki Ryo, Yokoyama Tetsuji, Kawashima Motoko, Nakano Tadashi, Yamada Masakazu
Department of Ophthalmology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.
Department of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Apr 27;12(5):1100. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051100.
We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of glaucoma screening using fundus photography combined with optical coherence tomography and determine the agreement between ophthalmologists and ophthalmology residents. We used a comprehensive ophthalmologic examination dataset obtained from 503 cases (1006 eyes). Of the 1006 eyes, 132 had a confirmed glaucoma diagnosis. Overall, 24 doctors, comprising two groups (ophthalmologists and ophthalmology residents, 12 individuals/group), analyzed the data presented in three screening strategies as follows: (1) fundus photography alone, (2) fundus photography + optical coherence tomography, and (3) fundus photography + optical coherence tomography + comprehensive examination. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity). The respective sensitivity and specificity values for the diagnostic accuracy obtained by 24 doctors, 12 ophthalmologists, and 12 ophthalmology residents were as follows: (1) fundus photography: sensitivity, 55.4%, 55.4%, and 55.4%; specificity, 91.8%, 94.0%, and 89.6%; (2) fundus photography + OCT: sensitivity, 80.0%, 82.3%, and 77.8%; specificity, 91.7%, 92.9%, and 90.6%; and (3) fundus photography + OCT + comprehensive examination: sensitivity 78.4%, 79.8%, and 77.1%; specificity, 92.7%, 94.0%, and 91.3%. The diagnostic accuracy of glaucoma screening significantly increased with optical coherence tomography. Following its addition, ophthalmologists could more effectively improve the diagnostic accuracy than ophthalmology residents. Screening accuracy is improved when optical coherence tomography is added to fundus photography.
我们旨在评估使用眼底摄影结合光学相干断层扫描进行青光眼筛查的准确性,并确定眼科医生与眼科住院医师之间的一致性。我们使用了从503例患者(1006只眼)中获得的综合眼科检查数据集。在这1006只眼中,有132只被确诊为青光眼。总体而言,24名医生分为两组(眼科医生和眼科住院医师,每组12人),分析了以下三种筛查策略呈现的数据:(1)仅眼底摄影,(2)眼底摄影+光学相干断层扫描,以及(3)眼底摄影+光学相干断层扫描+综合检查。我们调查了诊断准确性(敏感性和特异性)。24名医生、12名眼科医生和12名眼科住院医师获得的诊断准确性的各自敏感性和特异性值如下:(1)眼底摄影:敏感性分别为55.4%、55.4%和55.4%;特异性分别为91.8%、94.0%和89.6%;(2)眼底摄影+光学相干断层扫描:敏感性分别为80.0%、82.3%和77.8%;特异性分别为9