Terauchi Ryo, Wada Takashi, Ogawa Shumpei, Kaji Masanobu, Kato Tomohiro, Tatemichi Masayuki, Nakano Tadashi
Department of Ophthalmology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.
Health Science, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.
J Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar 29;2020:4687398. doi: 10.1155/2020/4687398. eCollection 2020.
We aimed to investigate the efficacy of frequency doubling technology (FDT) perimetry for glaucoma detection in comprehensive screening examinations. We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of participants who underwent a comprehensive health checkup service. Participants with glaucoma were excluded. In the first year, 2024 participants (46.8 ± 9.4 years) who underwent FDT perimetry and fundus photography were classified as the FDT group, whereas 3052 participants (42.2 ± 8.2 years) who underwent only fundus photography were classified as the non-FDT control group. Participants with abnormal findings on FDT perimetry and/or fundus photography were recommended to undergo further complete examination. All participants reported whether they had been newly diagnosed with glaucoma within 2 years of the first visit. In the FDT group, 23 (1.14%) participants were newly diagnosed with glaucoma. Among them, 20 (87.0%) had abnormal FDT perimetry findings and 12 (52.2%) had abnormal findings on fundus photography. The positive-predictive value (PPV) of FDT perimetry was 16.5% (20/121) and that of fundus photography was 13.3% (12/90). In participants with abnormal findings on both tests, the PPV was 26.2%. In the non-FDT group, 15 (0.49%) participants were newly diagnosed with glaucoma. Among them, 9 (60.0%) had abnormal findings on fundus photography. The PPV of fundus photography was 10.8% (9/83). The glaucoma detection rate, analyzed using age adjustment, was significantly higher in the FDT group than that in the non-FDT group (0.97% versus 0.47%, =0.041). FDT perimetry, even if performed by nonspecialized physicians, could improve glaucoma detection when used in addition to fundus photography. This study was registered with UMIN000037951.
我们旨在研究倍频技术(FDT)视野检查在综合筛查中检测青光眼的效果。我们对前瞻性收集的接受全面健康检查服务参与者的数据进行了回顾性分析。排除患有青光眼的参与者。在第一年,2024名接受FDT视野检查和眼底照相的参与者(46.8±9.4岁)被归类为FDT组,而3052名仅接受眼底照相的参与者(42.2±8.2岁)被归类为非FDT对照组。FDT视野检查和/或眼底照相有异常结果的参与者被建议接受进一步的全面检查。所有参与者报告他们在首次就诊后2年内是否被新诊断为青光眼。在FDT组中,23名(1.14%)参与者被新诊断为青光眼。其中,20名(87.0%)FDT视野检查结果异常,12名(52.2%)眼底照相有异常结果。FDT视野检查的阳性预测值(PPV)为16.5%(20/121),眼底照相的PPV为13.3%(12/90)。两项检查结果均异常的参与者中,PPV为26.2%。在非FDT组中,15名(0.49%)参与者被新诊断为青光眼。其中,9名(60.0%)眼底照相有异常结果。眼底照相的PPV为10.8%(9/83)。使用年龄调整分析的青光眼检出率,FDT组显著高于非FDT组(0.97%对0.47%,P=0.041)。即使由非专科医生进行FDT视野检查,与眼底照相联合使用时也可提高青光眼的检出率。本研究在UMIN000037951注册。